• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Readability and beyond - Health literacy and numeracy and COVID-19 communications in early childhood education: Are we communicating effectively?可读性及其他——幼儿期健康素养和算数能力与 COVID-19 传播:我们的沟通是否有效?
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107823. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107823. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption.大流行时期的传播:面向公众的文件易读性。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):116-121. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13066. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.健康素养与互联网:一项关于澳大利亚在线健康信息可读性的研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):309-14. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12341. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study.评估风湿病医学信息单的可读性和患者理解度:一项横断面健康素养研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582.
5
Improving access to COVID-19 information by ensuring the readability of government websites.通过确保政府网站的易读性来改善获取 COVID-19 信息的途径。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Apr;34(2):595-602. doi: 10.1002/hpja.610. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
The Readability, Actionability, and Accessibility of Hemorrhoid-Focused Online Patient Education Materials: Are We Adequately Addressing Patient Concerns?以痔疮为重点的在线患者教育材料的可读性、可操作性和可及性:我们是否充分解决了患者的担忧?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 May 1;68(5):584-592. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003691. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.评估主要老年病学协会在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1051-1056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16960. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study.新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在线患者教育材料的易读性:一项横断面健康素养研究。
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Online resources for strabismus: an evaluation of readability, complexity, and suitability.斜视的在线资源:可读性、复杂性和适用性评估
Strabismus. 2025 Mar;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2408029. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The reception of public health messages during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间公众健康信息的接收情况。
Appl Corpus Linguistics. 2023 Apr;3(1):100037. doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100037. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
2
Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts.推特#Covid19NZ帖子中的指令、礼貌与立场。
J Pragmat. 2022 Jul;196:6-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Main COVID-19 information sources in a culturally and linguistically diverse community in Sydney, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚悉尼一个多元文化和多语言社区中主要的 COVID-19 信息来源:一项横断面调查。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2793-2800. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.028. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
4
COVID-19, mathematics education, and the evaluation of expert knowledge.2019冠状病毒病、数学教育与专家知识评估
Educ Stud Math. 2021;108(1-2):401-417. doi: 10.1007/s10649-021-10097-2. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Mathematical media literacy in the COVID-19 pandemic and its relation to school mathematics education.新冠疫情中的数学媒体素养及其与学校数学教育的关系。
Educ Stud Math. 2021;108(1-2):201-225. doi: 10.1007/s10649-021-10075-8. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
6
The readability of official public health information on COVID-19.关于新冠疫情的官方公共卫生信息的可读性。
Med J Aust. 2021 Oct 18;215(8):373-375. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51282. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
7
The language of states' COVID-19 messages: Correlates of positive and negative emotion and health outcomes.国家 COVID-19 信息的语言:积极和消极情绪与健康结果的关联。
J Prev Interv Community. 2021 Apr-Jun;49(2):119-126. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2021.1908203. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
8
Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption.大流行时期的传播:面向公众的文件易读性。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):116-121. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13066. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
9
Critical observations on and suggested ways forward for healthcare communication during COVID-19: pEACH position paper.关于 COVID-19 期间医疗保健沟通的重要观察和建议方向:pEACH 立场文件。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.025. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
10
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.在线 COVID-19 健康信息的易读性:四个英语国家之间的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;20(1):1635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5.

可读性及其他——幼儿期健康素养和算数能力与 COVID-19 传播:我们的沟通是否有效?

Readability and beyond - Health literacy and numeracy and COVID-19 communications in early childhood education: Are we communicating effectively?

机构信息

Institute for Communication in Health Care, College of Arts and Social Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107823. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107823. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107823
PMID:37270932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10210820/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analyse the linguistic and numerical complexity of COVID-19-related health information communicated from Australian national and state governments and health agencies to national and local early childhood education (ECE) settings.

METHODS

Publicly available health information (n = 630) was collected from Australian national and state governments and health agencies, and ECE agencies and service providers. A purposive sample of documents (n = 33) from 2020 to 2021 was analysed inductively and deductively combining readability, health numeracy and linguistic analyses and focusing on the most frequent actionable health advice topics.

RESULTS

COVID-19 health advice most frequently related to hygiene, distancing and exclusion. Readability scores in 79% (n = 23) of documents were above the recommended grade 6 reading level for the public. Advice was delivered using direct linguistic strategies (n = 288), indirect strategies (n = 73), and frequent mitigating hedges (n = 142). Most numerical concepts were relatively simple, but lacked elaborative features (e.g., analogies) and/or required subjective interpretation.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 health advice available to the ECE sector included linguistic and numerical information open to mis/interpretation making it difficult to understand and implement.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Combining readability scores with measures of linguistic and numerical complexity offers a more holistic approach to assessing accessibility of health advice and improving health literacy among its recipients.

摘要

目的

分析澳大利亚国家和州政府以及卫生机构向国家和地方幼儿教育(ECE)机构传达的与 COVID-19 相关的健康信息的语言和数字复杂性。

方法

从澳大利亚国家和州政府以及卫生机构和 ECE 机构和服务提供商处收集了公开的健康信息(n=630)。对 2020 年至 2021 年的 33 份有针对性的文件(n=33)进行了归纳和演绎分析,结合了可读性、健康算数和语言分析,并重点关注最常见的可操作的健康建议主题。

结果

COVID-19 健康建议最常涉及卫生、距离和排除。79%(n=23)的文件的可读性得分高于公众推荐的 6 年级阅读水平。建议使用直接语言策略(n=288)、间接策略(n=73)和频繁的减轻缓和语(n=142)传达。大多数数字概念相对简单,但缺乏详细的特征(例如,类比)和/或需要主观解释。

结论

向 ECE 部门提供的 COVID-19 健康建议包括容易被错误/解释的语言和数字信息,使得理解和实施变得困难。

实践意义

将可读性评分与语言和数字复杂性的衡量标准相结合,提供了一种更全面的方法来评估健康建议的可访问性,并提高其接受者的健康素养。