Suppr超能文献

一种使用SNPA进行鼻气管纤维光导插管的创新技术及其与传统技术的比较:随机对照试验。

An innovative technique for nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation using SNPA and its comparison with conventional technique: RCT.

作者信息

Meena Kavita, Meena Rajesh Kumar, Palanisamy Deepak, Nayak Aditya Prakash

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, G Kuppusamy Naidu Memorial Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan-Apr;14(1):41-46. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_120_22. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Awake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation by conventional technique is time consuming and requires expertise. Complications encountered in the conventional technique sometime leads to procedure failure.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to compare the innovative technique using split nasopharyngeal airway (SNPA) with the conventional technique for nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation in terms of time taken for intubation.

METHOD

This was a prospective, randomized, and single blind study conducted with 80 patients who were scheduled for maxillofacial surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups, group CFBI (conventional fiberoptic intubation) and group SNPA (split nasopharyngeal airway). In both the groups patients were prepared for awake fiberoptic naso-tracheal intubation. In Group CFBI (N = 41) awake naso-tracheal intubation was achieved by conventional technique of bronchoscope first approach. In Group SNPA (N = 39) spirally split nasopharyngeal airway was used first as a conduit for the passage of fiberoptic bronchoscope. The primary objective was to assess the time taken for intubation. The secondary objectives were to assess the rate of complications in the form of bleeding, cough, desaturation during the procedure, laryngospasm, and nasal bleeding.

RESULT

The time taken for intubation was 6.15 ± 3.0 minutes in CFBI group and 3.10 ± 1.35 minutes in SNPA group and this this difference was statically significant with value <0.001. Desaturation during the procedure was more in CFBI (99.46 ± 0.75) compared to SNPA (99 ± 0) group with significant difference value <0.001.

CONCLUSION

Split nasopharyngeal airway was used as conduit for the passage for the flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope and it considerably reduced the time required for fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation compared to the conventional technique of endotracheal tube first approach. Split nasopharyngeal airway provided better intubating conditions with lesser complications and superior patient comfort.

摘要

背景

采用传统技术进行清醒状态下鼻纤维支气管镜插管耗时且需要专业技能。传统技术中遇到的并发症有时会导致操作失败。

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较使用分体式鼻咽气道(SNPA)的创新技术与传统鼻纤维支气管镜插管技术在插管时间方面的差异。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究,纳入了80例计划接受颌面外科手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组,CFBI组(传统纤维支气管镜插管组)和SNPA组(分体式鼻咽气道组)。两组患者均准备进行清醒状态下鼻纤维支气管镜插管。在CFBI组(n = 41)中,通过支气管镜优先进入的传统技术实现清醒状态下鼻气管插管。在SNPA组(n = 39)中,首先使用螺旋式分体式鼻咽气道作为纤维支气管镜通过的管道。主要目的是评估插管时间。次要目的是以出血、咳嗽、操作过程中的血氧饱和度下降、喉痉挛和鼻出血的形式评估并发症发生率。

结果

CFBI组的插管时间为6.15±3.0分钟,SNPA组为3.10±1.35分钟,差异具有统计学意义(P值<0.001)。与SNPA组(99±0)相比,CFBI组(99.46±0.75)在操作过程中的血氧饱和度下降更明显,差异具有统计学意义(P值<0.0=001)。

结论

分体式鼻咽气道用作可弯曲纤维支气管镜通过的管道,与气管导管优先进入的传统技术相比,它显著减少了纤维支气管镜鼻气管插管所需的时间。分体式鼻咽气道提供了更好的插管条件,并发症更少,患者舒适度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验