Ghorbani Bahram, Zendehboudi Sohrab, Saady Noori M Cata, Duan Xili, Albayati Talib M
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1B 3X5, Canada.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad 10071, Iraq.
ACS Omega. 2023 May 18;8(21):18358-18399. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c01072. eCollection 2023 May 30.
The main challenges of liquid hydrogen (H) storage as one of the most promising techniques for large-scale transport and long-term storage include its high specific energy consumption (SEC), low exergy efficiency, high total expenses, and boil-off gas losses. This article reviews different approaches to improving H liquefaction methods, including the implementation of absorption cooling cycles (ACCs), ejector cooling units, liquid nitrogen/liquid natural gas (LNG)/liquid air cold energy recovery, cascade liquefaction processes, mixed refrigerant systems, integration with other structures, optimization algorithms, combined with renewable energy sources, and the pinch strategy. This review discusses the economic, safety, and environmental aspects of various improvement techniques for H liquefaction systems in more detail. Standards and codes for H liquefaction technologies are presented, and the current status and future potentials of H liquefaction processes are investigated. The cost-efficient H liquefaction systems are those with higher production rates (>100 tonne/day), higher efficiency (>40%), lower SEC (<6 kWh/kgLH), and lower investment costs (1-2 $/kgLH). Increasing the stages in the conversion of ortho- to para-H lowers the SEC and increases the investment costs. Moreover, using low-temperature waste heat from various industries and renewable energy in the ACC for precooling is significantly more efficient than electricity generation in power generation cycles to be utilized in H liquefaction cycles. In addition, the substitution of LNG cold recovery for the precooling cycle is associated with the lower SEC and cost compared to its combination with the precooling cycle.
作为大规模运输和长期储存最具前景的技术之一,液氢储存面临的主要挑战包括其高比能耗(SEC)、低火用效率、高总成本以及蒸发气体损失。本文综述了改进氢液化方法的不同途径,包括采用吸收式制冷循环(ACC)、喷射器冷却装置、液氮/液态天然气(LNG)/液态空气冷能回收、级联液化工艺、混合制冷剂系统、与其他结构集成、优化算法、与可再生能源结合以及夹点策略。本综述更详细地讨论了氢液化系统各种改进技术的经济、安全和环境方面。介绍了氢液化技术的标准和规范,并研究了氢液化工艺的现状和未来潜力。具有成本效益的氢液化系统是那些生产率较高(>100吨/天)、效率较高(>40%)、SEC较低(<6千瓦时/千克液氢)且投资成本较低(1-2美元/千克液氢)的系统。增加正氢向仲氢转化的阶段会降低SEC,但会增加投资成本。此外,在ACC中利用各行业的低温废热和可再生能源进行预冷,比在氢液化循环中利用发电循环发电要高效得多。此外,与将LNG冷回收与预冷循环相结合相比,用LNG冷回收替代预冷循环的SEC和成本更低。