• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包容性社会研究模式的优势与局限:自传式民族志。

Strengths and limitations of the Inclusive Society research model: an autoethnography.

机构信息

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(11):2259-2268. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2219067. Epub 2023 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2219067
PMID:37277901
Abstract

The partnership research model aims to promote change in society for people with disabilities by supporting research teams composed of researchers and partner organizations. The objective of this article is to identify the strengths and limitations of this research model. An autoethnography approach was used. Thematic analysis of four methods was undertaken: semi-directed interviews with members of the research teams funded by (researchers, partners), a focus group with the 's intersectoral collaboration agents, their logbooks, and 's annual reports. Strengths and limitations of the model were identified through their networking activities, the role and support of the intersectoral collaboration agents and the partnership research program. Networking activities are an essential element of . They are indispensable for composing intersectoral research teams that will work on answering needs of people with disabilities. Intersectoral collaboration agents are also a strength of the model, but their role could be clarified to better frame what tasks are in their scope of practice and what the research teams could ask from them. Finally, the research program eligibility criteria could be improved to support, among others, the projects' appropriation phases.

摘要

伙伴关系研究模式旨在通过支持由研究人员和伙伴组织组成的研究团队,促进残疾人社会的变革。本文的目的是确定该研究模式的优势和局限性。采用自传体方法。对以下四种方法进行了主题分析:与 (研究人员、合作伙伴)资助的研究团队成员进行半结构化访谈、与 的跨部门合作代理进行焦点小组讨论、他们的日志以及 的年度报告。通过伙伴关系研究模式的网络活动、跨部门合作代理的角色和支持以及伙伴关系研究计划,确定了该模式的优势和局限性。网络活动是 的一个重要组成部分。它们对于组成跨部门研究团队至关重要,这些团队将致力于满足残疾人的需求。跨部门合作代理也是该模式的优势之一,但可以明确他们的角色,以更好地界定他们的工作范围以及研究团队可以向他们提出的要求。最后,可以改进研究计划的资格标准,以支持项目的拨款阶段等。

相似文献

1
Strengths and limitations of the Inclusive Society research model: an autoethnography.包容性社会研究模式的优势与局限:自传式民族志。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(11):2259-2268. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2219067. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
2
Facilitators and challenges in partnership research aimed at improving social inclusion of persons with disabilities.旨在促进残疾人社会包容的伙伴关系研究中的促进因素和挑战。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Mar;46(5):957-968. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2188264. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Determining the competences of community based workers for disability-inclusive development in rural areas of South Africa, Botswana and Malawi.确定南非、博茨瓦纳和马拉维农村地区社区工作者在促进包容性残疾发展方面的能力。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):2919. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
4
Guidance for Genuine Collaboration: Insights from Academic, Tribal, and Community Partner Interviews on a New Research Partnership.关于真正合作的指导:从学术、部落和社区合作伙伴访谈中获得的新研究伙伴关系的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 16;16(24):5132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245132.
5
Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada).旨在实现权力变革:公共住房租户的跨部门 CBPR 经验教训(加拿大魁北克)。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Aug 1;39(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae085.
6
Stakeholder views on work participation for workers with depression and intersectoral collaboration in depression care: a focus group study with a salutogenic perspective.利益相关者对抑郁症患者工作参与和跨部门合作的看法:一项具有健康促进视角的焦点小组研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Sep;41(3):204-213. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2238019. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
7
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
8
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.通过经验探索与年轻伙伴建立研究合作关系的“方式”:从加拿大、荷兰和英国的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00400-7.
9
The impact of community based rehabilitation as implemented by community rehabilitation facilitators on people with disabilities, their families and communities within South Africa.由社区康复促进者实施的社区康复对南非残疾人及其家庭和社区的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/09638280802280429.
10
Learning from intersectoral initiatives to respond to the needs of refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status in the context of COVID-19 in Quebec and Ontario: a qualitative multiple case study protocol.借鉴魁北克和安大略省在 COVID-19 背景下应对难民、寻求庇护者和无身份移民需求的跨部门举措:一项定性多案例研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 20;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00991-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-design knowledge mobilization tools for universal accessibility in municipalities.共同设计知识传播工具,以实现市政当局的普遍可达性。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 1;5:1331728. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728. eCollection 2024.