• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy in the surgical treatment of complicated appendicitis.回盲部切除术与右半结肠切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jun;29(6):705-709. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.83357.
2
Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术住院时间的影响因素:单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243575. eCollection 2020.
3
Management of Large Cecal Polyps: When Can the Ileocecal Valve Be Spared?大盲肠息肉的处理:哪些情况下可以保留回盲瓣?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Sep;61(9):1089-1095. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001159.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in high risk patients.高危患者复杂性阑尾炎的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;30(3):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2095-4. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
5
Inflammatory cecal masses in patients presenting with appendicitis.患有阑尾炎的患者出现的炎性盲肠肿块。
World J Surg. 1999 Jul;23(7):713-6; discussion 716. doi: 10.1007/pl00012374.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
7
Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy.阑尾切除术后发病的危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1608-3. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Ileocecectomy is definitive treatment for advanced appendicitis.回盲部切除术是晚期阑尾炎的确定性治疗方法。
Am Surg. 2001 Dec;67(12):1117-22.
9
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.
10
Risk factors for postoperative morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after appendectomy for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎切除术后术后发病率、住院时间延长和再入院的风险因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1355-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02225-9. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative predictors of extended resection in patients with complicated acute appendicitis undergoing surgery.手术治疗复杂急性阑尾炎患者行扩大切除术的术前预测因素。
J Med Invest. 2021;68(3.4):334-341. doi: 10.2152/jmi.68.334.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
3
Early versus late surgical management for complicated appendicitis in adults: a multicenter propensity score matching study.成人复杂性阑尾炎的早期与晚期手术治疗:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Aug;97(2):103-111. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.2.103. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy.复杂性阑尾炎及间隔期阑尾切除术的考量
JAAPA. 2018 Sep;31(9):35-41. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000544304.30954.40.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:如何阻止外科医生采用不充分的治疗方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 28;23(32):5849-5859. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5849.
6
Preoperative predictor of extensive resection for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎广泛切除的术前预测指标。
Am J Surg. 2018 Apr;215(4):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.033. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理。2015年欧洲内镜外科学会共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术的全国前瞻性结局审核。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):144-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9964. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.急性阑尾炎:发病机制、诊断和治疗的现代认识。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
10
Treatment of appendiceal mass--a qualitative systematic review.阑尾肿块的治疗——一项定性系统评价
Dan Med J. 2014 Aug;61(8):A4881.

回盲部切除术与右半结肠切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的比较。

Comparison of ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy in the surgical treatment of complicated appendicitis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli-Türkiye.

Department of Gastroenteroloji Surgery, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jun;29(6):705-709. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.83357.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2023.83357
PMID:37278071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10315939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simple appendectomy with a complicated appendicitis diagnosis could prove difficult, sometimes requiring ex-tended resection. Hence, we aimed to compare two procedures that are preferred for extended resection, ileocecal resection, and right hemicolectomy, in terms of patients' demographic data, preoperative laboratory values (white blood cell [WBC], Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [N/L], C-reactive protein [CRP]), operation times, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and 1-month mortality rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appen-dicitis in our clinic from February 2015 to December 2020. We divided the patients into two groups those who underwent right hemicolectomy and those who underwent ileocecal resection.

RESULTS

Among the 55 patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, 32 (58.1%) underwent right hemicolectomy and 23 underwent ileocecal resection (41.8%). The groups did not differ statistically significantly in terms of demographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory values (WBC, N/L, CRP), Clavien-Dindo classification scores, mean hospital stay, or 1-month mortality rates (p>0.005). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operation time (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ileocecal resection is a safe procedure for patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis who are scheduled for extended resection.

摘要

背景

简单的阑尾切除术合并复杂的阑尾炎诊断可能会变得困难,有时需要进行扩大切除。因此,我们旨在比较两种常用于扩大切除的手术方法,回盲部切除术和右半结肠切除术,比较其在患者人口统计学数据、术前实验室值(白细胞[WBC]、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值[N/L]、C 反应蛋白[CRP])、手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间和 1 个月死亡率方面的差异。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 2 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院行扩大切除术诊断为复杂阑尾炎的患者。我们将患者分为两组,一组行右半结肠切除术,另一组行回盲部切除术。

结果

在 55 例诊断为复杂阑尾炎行扩大切除术的患者中,32 例(58.1%)行右半结肠切除术,23 例行回盲部切除术(41.8%)。两组在人口统计学特征、术前实验室值(WBC、N/L、CRP)、Clavien-Dindo 分类评分、平均住院时间或 1 个月死亡率方面无统计学差异(p>0.005)。然而,两组在手术时间方面存在统计学差异(p<0.001)。

结论

对于诊断为复杂阑尾炎并计划进行扩大切除的患者,回盲部切除术是一种安全的手术方法。