Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 6;13(6):e069256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069256.
In recent years, eye-tracking has been proposed as a promising tool to identify potential biomarkers for mental disorders, including major depression. We will conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on eye-tracking research in adults with major depressive disorder or other clinically diagnosed depressive disorders.
This protocol follows all reporting items in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol extension. We will conduct a systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and EMBASE for sources published up until March 2023. Abstract and full-text review will be completed independently by two reviewers. Non-randomised studies using eye movement tasks in individuals with a depressive disorder versus controls will be included. Eye movement tasks of interest include, but are not limited to, saccade, smooth pursuit, fixation, free-viewing, attentional disengagement, visual search and attentional blink tasks. Results will be categorised by eye movement task. Risk of bias will be assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.
Ethics approval is not required due to the nature of the proposed analysis. Results will be disseminated through a journal article, conference presentations and/or dissertations.
近年来,眼动追踪技术已被提议作为一种有前途的工具,用于识别精神障碍(包括重度抑郁症)的潜在生物标志物。我们将对成人重度抑郁症或其他临床诊断的抑郁症患者的眼动追踪研究进行更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
本方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告项目的所有报告项目扩展。我们将对 PubMed、PsycINFO、Google Scholar 和 EMBASE 进行系统搜索,以查找截至 2023 年 3 月发布的来源。摘要和全文审查将由两名评审员独立完成。将纳入使用眼动任务的非随机研究,该任务将抑郁障碍患者与对照组进行比较。感兴趣的眼动任务包括但不限于扫视、平滑追踪、注视、自由观看、注意力脱离、视觉搜索和注意力眨眼任务。结果将按眼动任务进行分类。使用美国国立卫生研究院观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估标准评估累积证据的可信度。
由于拟议分析的性质,不需要伦理批准。结果将通过期刊文章、会议演讲和/或论文传播。