• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS):模仿美国放射学会TIRADS的单中心回顾性研究

Revised Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS): imitating the American College of Radiology TIRADS, a single-center retrospective study.

作者信息

Liang Fengping, Li Xiang, Ji Qiao, He Danni, Yang Mo, Xu Zuofeng

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.

Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3862-3872. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1307. Epub 2023 May 15.

DOI:10.21037/qims-22-1307
PMID:37284080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240023/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of thyroid lumps is more and more high in population, and most biopsies of thyroid nodules are benign. To develop a practical risk stratification system based on five ultrasound features to stratify the malignancy risk of thyroid neoplasms.

METHODS

This retrospective investigation enrolled 999 consecutive patients with 1,236 thyroid nodules who underwent ultrasound screening. Fine-needle aspiration and/or surgery was performed, and pathology results were obtained at the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in Shenzhen, China, which is a tertiary referral center, from May 2018 to February 2022. Each thyroid nodule's score was calculated based on five ultrasound features: composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, and echogenic foci. Additionally, each nodule's malignancy rate was calculated. The chi-square test was used to test whether the malignancy rate was different among the three subcategories (scores of 4-6, 7-8, and 9 or more) of thyroid nodules. We proposed the revised Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (R-TIRADS), and its sensitivity and specificity were compared to the two existing systems [the American College of Radiology TIRADS (ACR TIRADS) and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS (K-TIRADS)].

RESULTS

The final dataset consisted of 425 nodules from 370 patients. The malignancy rates of three subcategories [malignancy rate: 28.8% (scores from 4-6), 64.7% (scores from 7-8), and 84.2% (scores of 9 or more)] were significantly different (P<0.01). The unnecessary biopsy rates of the three systems (ACR TIRADS, R-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) were 28.7%, 25.2%, and 14.8%, respectively. The R-TIRADS presented better diagnostic performance than the ACR TIRADS or K-TIRADS [area under the curve: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83) 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64-0.75), P=0.046; 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83) . 0.66 (95% CI: 0.60-0.71), P=0.041, respectively]. The R-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity [0.746 (95% CI: 0.689-0.803)], followed by the K-TIRADS [0.399 (95% CI: 0.335-0.463), P=0.000] and ACR TIRADS [0.377 (95% CI: 0.314-0.441), P=0.000].

CONCLUSIONS

The R-TIRADS enables radiologists to diagnose thyroid nodules efficiently, and the number of unnecessary fine-needle aspirations can be considerably reduced.

摘要

背景

甲状腺结节在人群中的发病率越来越高,大多数甲状腺结节活检为良性。基于五项超声特征建立一个实用的风险分层系统,以对甲状腺肿瘤的恶性风险进行分层。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了999例连续接受超声筛查的患者,共1236个甲状腺结节。在中国深圳的中山大学附属第七医院(这是一家三级转诊中心),于2018年5月至2022年2月对这些患者进行了细针穿刺和/或手术,并获得了病理结果。根据五项超声特征(成分、回声、形状、边界和钙化灶)计算每个甲状腺结节的评分。此外,计算每个结节的恶性率。采用卡方检验来检验甲状腺结节的三个亚类(评分4 - 6分、7 - 8分和9分及以上)之间的恶性率是否存在差异。我们提出了修订后的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(R - TIRADS),并将其敏感性和特异性与两个现有系统[美国放射学会TIRADS(ACR TIRADS)和韩国甲状腺放射学会TIRADS(K - TIRADS)]进行比较。

结果

最终数据集包括来自370例患者的425个结节。三个亚类的恶性率[恶性率:28.8%(评分4 - 6分)、64.7%(评分7 - 8分)和84.2%(评分9分及以上)]差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。三个系统(ACR TIRADS、R - TIRADS和K - TIRADS)的不必要活检率分别为28.7%、25.2%和14.8%。R - TIRADS的诊断性能优于ACR TIRADS或K - TIRADS[曲线下面积:0.79(95%CI:0.74 - 0.83)对0.69(95%CI:0.64 - 0.75),P = 0.046;0.79(95%CI:0.74 - 0.83)对0.66(95%CI:0.60 - 0.71),P = 0.041]。R - TIRADS的敏感性最高[0.746(9th5%CI:0.689 - 0.803)],其次是K - TIRADS[0.399(95%CI:0.335 - 0.463),P = 0.000]和ACR TIRADS[0.377(95%CI:0.314 - 0.441),P = 0.000]。

结论

R - TIRADS使放射科医生能够高效诊断甲状腺结节,并可大幅减少不必要的细针穿刺次数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/0a75877105dd/qims-13-06-3862-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/69314eebb1bf/qims-13-06-3862-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/577e305e62eb/qims-13-06-3862-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/0a75877105dd/qims-13-06-3862-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/69314eebb1bf/qims-13-06-3862-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/577e305e62eb/qims-13-06-3862-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e56/10240023/0a75877105dd/qims-13-06-3862-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Revised Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS): imitating the American College of Radiology TIRADS, a single-center retrospective study.修订后的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS):模仿美国放射学会TIRADS的单中心回顾性研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3862-3872. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1307. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Comparison of British Thyroid Association, American College of Radiology TIRADS and Artificial Intelligence TIRADS with histological correlation: diagnostic performance for predicting thyroid malignancy and unnecessary fine needle aspiration rate.与组织学相关性的英国甲状腺协会、美国放射学院 TIRADS 和人工智能 TIRADS 的比较:预测甲状腺恶性肿瘤和不必要的细针抽吸率的诊断性能。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Jul 1;94(1123):20201444. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201444. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Correlation of TIRADS scoring in thyroid nodules with preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy and postoperative specimen pathology.甲状腺结节 TIRADS 评分与术前细针穿刺活检及术后标本病理的相关性。
Head Neck. 2024 Apr;46(4):849-856. doi: 10.1002/hed.27622. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于成人的 ATA 和 ACR-TIRADS 超声风险分层系统在儿童甲状腺结节中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7450-7463. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07908-8. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
5
Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.C-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS和ATA指南在甲状腺结节恶性风险分层中的比较。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):4514-4525. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-826. Epub 2023 May 15.
6
Comparison of diagnostic performance and FNA management of the ACR-TIRADS and Chinese-TIRADS based on surgical histological evidence.基于手术组织学证据的ACR-TIRADS与中国-TIRADS诊断性能及细针穿刺活检管理的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1711-1722. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-685. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Differences among the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System proposed by Korean, the American College of Radiology and the European Thyroid Association in the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules.韩国、美国放射学会和欧洲甲状腺协会提出的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节诊断性能方面的差异。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(8):4958-4967. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2870.
8
Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline.2020年中国恶性甲状腺结节诊疗指南中基于超声的细针穿刺活检标准的诊断性能:与2017年美国放射学会指南、2015年美国甲状腺协会指南及2016年韩国甲状腺协会指南的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Aug;11(8):3604-3618. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1365.
9
Interobserver Variability of Ultrasound Features Based on American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon in American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System System: A Single-Center Study With Radiologists and Radiology Residents.基于美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统词汇的超声特征的观察者间变异性:美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统系统中的单中心研究:放射科医生和放射科住院医师。
Ultrasound Q. 2021 Dec 1;37(4):324-328. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000512.
10
Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines.美国放射学院 TI-RADS、韩国甲状腺放射学会 TIRADS 和美国甲状腺协会指南的性能特征比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):1148-1154. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18822. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Ultrasonographic Features Indicative of Malignancy on Tumor Advancement in Thyroid Cancer-A Single-Center Study.超声提示恶性特征对甲状腺癌肿瘤进展的影响——一项单中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 28;17(17):2822. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172822.
2
Assessment of risk factors and ultrasonographic characteristics for the differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules in Beni-Suef governorate, Egypt.埃及贝尼苏韦夫省甲状腺恶性结节与良性结节鉴别的危险因素及超声特征评估
BMC Endocr Disord. 2025 Sep 9;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12902-025-02038-4.
3
Role of Publicly-Funded Molecular Testing in Surgical Management of Thyroid Nodules within Canadian Medicare: Clinical Assessment of ThyroSeqv3 Molecular Test Pilot Project at McGill University.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics of inflammatory thyroid nodules and papillary thyroid carcinomas using a quantitative time-intensity curve: a propensity score matching analysis.使用定量时间-强度曲线比较炎性甲状腺结节和甲状腺乳头状癌的超声造影特征:倾向评分匹配分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Nov;12(11):5209-5221. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1208.
2
Diagnosis of thyroid nodules.甲状腺结节的诊断。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Jul;10(7):533-539. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00101-2.
3
A Practical CEUS Thyroid Reporting System for Thyroid Nodules.
加拿大医疗保险制度下公共资助的分子检测在甲状腺结节外科治疗中的作用:麦吉尔大学ThyroSeqv3分子检测试点项目的临床评估
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251336687. doi: 10.1177/19160216251336687. Epub 2025 May 28.
4
The Horizon of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodules: Clinical Application and Future Perspectives.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节诊断性能中的应用前景:临床应用与未来展望
touchREV Endocrinol. 2024 Oct;20(2):81-90. doi: 10.17925/EE.2024.20.2.11. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
A nomogram for risk stratification of central cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.甲状腺乳头状癌患者中央区颈淋巴结转移风险分层的列线图
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):5084-5098. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-284. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Predicting recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion by preoperative ultrasonography in patients with thyroid carcinoma.术前超声预测甲状腺癌患者喉返神经侵犯情况
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7002-7011. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-332. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
7
Can Routine Laboratory Tests Be Suggestive in Determining Suspicions of Malignancy in the Case of Thyroid Nodules?常规实验室检查能否提示甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤的可疑性?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 18;59(8):1488. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081488.
甲状腺结节超声造影实用报告系统
Radiology. 2022 Oct;305(1):149-159. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212319. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study.探讨中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与其他四个系统(ACR TI-RADS、Kwak-TIRADS、KSThR-TIRADS 和 EU-TIRADS)的诊断效能:一项单中心研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 27;12:763897. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.763897. eCollection 2021.
5
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能:与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Thyroid Incidentalomas: Practice Considerations for Radiologists in the Age of Incidental Findings.甲状腺偶发瘤:偶然发现时代放射科医生的实践考量
Radiol Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;58(6):1019-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Diagnostic Performance of American College of Radiology TI-RADS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):38-47. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22691. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Using Artificial Intelligence to Revise ACR TI-RADS Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility.使用人工智能修订甲状腺结节 ACR TI-RADS 风险分层:诊断准确性和实用性。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):112-119. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182128. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.比较 TIRADS(ACR TI-RADS 和 KWAK-TI-RADS)与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节诊断效率中的应用。
Endocrine. 2019 Apr;64(1):90-96. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01843-x. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
10
Reducing the Number of Unnecessary Thyroid Biopsies While Improving Diagnostic Accuracy: Toward the "Right" TIRADS.在提高诊断准确性的同时减少不必要的甲状腺活检:走向“正确”的 TIRADS。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jan 1;104(1):95-102. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01674.