Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
J Neurosci. 2023 Jun 21;43(25):4664-4683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0166-23.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
Binary classification, an act of sorting items into two classes by setting a boundary, is biased by recent history. One common form of such bias is repulsive bias, a tendency to sort an item into the class opposite to its preceding items. Sensory-adaptation and boundary-updating are considered as two contending sources of the repulsive bias, yet no neural support has been provided for either source. Here, we explored human brains of both men and women, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to find such support by relating the brain signals of sensory-adaptation and boundary-updating to human classification behavior. We found that the stimulus-encoding signal in the early visual cortex adapted to previous stimuli, yet its adaptation-related changes were dissociated from current choices. Contrastingly, the boundary-representing signals in the inferior-parietal and superior-temporal cortices shifted to previous stimuli and covaried with current choices. Our exploration points to boundary-updating, rather than sensory-adaptation, as the origin of the repulsive bias in binary classification. Many animal and human studies on perceptual decision-making have reported an intriguing history effect called "repulsive bias," a tendency to classify an item as the opposite class of its previous item. Regarding the origin of repulsive bias, two contending ideas have been proposed: "bias in stimulus representation because of sensory adaptation" versus "bias in class-boundary setting because of belief updating." By conducting model-based neuroimaging experiments, we verified their predictions about which brain signal should contribute to the trial-to-trial variability in choice behavior. We found that the brain signal of class boundary, but not stimulus representation, contributed to the choice variability associated with repulsive bias. Our study provides the first neural evidence supporting the boundary-based hypothesis of repulsive bias.
二进制分类,通过设定边界将项目分为两类的行为,受到最近历史的影响。这种偏差的一种常见形式是排斥偏差,即一种将项目分类到与其前一个项目相反的类别的趋势。感觉适应和边界更新被认为是排斥偏差的两个竞争来源,但都没有为这种来源提供神经支持。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来探索男性和女性的人脑,通过将感觉适应和边界更新的大脑信号与人类分类行为相关联,寻找这种支持。我们发现,早期视觉皮层的刺激编码信号适应了先前的刺激,但它的适应相关变化与当前的选择是分离的。相比之下,下顶叶和上颞叶皮层的边界代表信号向先前的刺激移动,并与当前的选择相关。我们的探索表明,在二进制分类中,是边界更新而不是感觉适应,是排斥偏差的来源。许多关于感知决策的动物和人类研究报告了一种有趣的历史效应,称为“排斥偏差”,即一种将项目分类为其前一个项目的相反类别的趋势。关于排斥偏差的起源,有两种相互竞争的观点:“由于感觉适应而导致刺激表示的偏差”与“由于信念更新而导致类别边界设定的偏差”。通过进行基于模型的神经影像学实验,我们验证了他们关于哪种大脑信号应该对选择行为的试验间可变性做出贡献的预测。我们发现,类别边界的大脑信号而不是刺激表示,对与排斥偏差相关的选择可变性做出了贡献。我们的研究提供了支持排斥偏差的基于边界的假设的第一个神经证据。