Suppr超能文献

从社会角度看激进化。

Radicalization from a societal perspective.

作者信息

Shafieioun Delaram, Haq Hina

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1197282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197282. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Studies on radicalization tend to focus on the dynamics of extremist groups and how they exploit grievances of vulnerable individuals. It is imperative, however, to also understand the societal factors that lead to such vulnerabilities and grievances. Our social environment plays a key role in how we view the world and shape our beliefs. By understanding the social dynamics, we can gain insight into the motivations that drive people to extremism. Throughout this paper, we examine the societal factors and processes such as discriminative institutional structures and social norms/practices that can make an individual vulnerable and serve as a driving force for them to join a radical group. To do that, we use the process-oriented psychology of Arnold Mindell and the phenomenology of whiteness of Sara Ahmed as our theoretical framework. These frameworks help us map out the societal dynamics causing individuals to carve social niches out of their current social group and into an extremist group. We use interviews with ex-militants of the radical group, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, to show how certain societal dynamics, such as social injustice, misuse of power, marginalization and discrimination, served as key factors that led these individuals to identify and sympathize with radical ideology. The aim of this paper is to emphasize that, to develop effective preventative measures against recruitment into extremist groups, it is imperative to have a profound understanding of the social dynamics that make an individual susceptible to radicalization in the first place.

摘要

关于激进化的研究往往侧重于极端组织的动态以及它们如何利用弱势群体的不满情绪。然而,同样重要的是要理解导致这些脆弱性和不满情绪的社会因素。我们的社会环境在我们如何看待世界以及塑造我们的信仰方面起着关键作用。通过了解社会动态,我们可以深入了解驱使人们走向极端主义的动机。在本文中,我们研究了社会因素和过程,例如歧视性的制度结构以及社会规范/习俗,这些因素可能使个人变得脆弱,并成为他们加入激进组织的驱动力。为此,我们使用阿诺德·明德尔的过程导向心理学和萨拉·艾哈迈德的白人现象学作为我们的理论框架。这些框架帮助我们梳理出导致个人从当前社会群体中脱离出来并融入极端组织的社会动态。我们通过对激进组织伊拉克和叙利亚伊斯兰国的前武装分子进行访谈,来展示某些社会动态,如社会不公、权力滥用、边缘化和歧视,是如何成为导致这些人认同并同情激进意识形态的关键因素。本文的目的是强调,为了制定有效的预防措施以防止人们加入极端组织,首先必须深刻理解使个人容易激进化的社会动态。

相似文献

1
Radicalization from a societal perspective.从社会角度看激进化。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1197282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197282. eCollection 2023.
3
Radicalization to Violence: A View from Cultural Psychiatry.激进化走向暴力:文化精神病学的视角。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):603-615. doi: 10.1177/13634615211048010. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
The Need to Refocus on the Group as the Site of Radicalization.需要重新关注群体作为激进化的场所。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):327-352. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885870. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Psychological Impact of Oppression Using the Trauma Symptoms of Discrimination Scale.使用歧视创伤症状量表理解压迫的心理影响。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2023 Jan 17;7:24705470221149511. doi: 10.1177/24705470221149511. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Risk Matrix for Violent Radicalization: A Machine Learning Approach.暴力激进化风险矩阵:一种机器学习方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:745608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745608. eCollection 2022.
4
The Traumatizing Impact of Racism in Canadians of Colour.种族主义对有色人种加拿大人造成的创伤性影响。
Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8(2):17-34. doi: 10.1007/s40719-022-00225-5. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances.政治意识形态暴力:聚焦不满情绪。
Eur J Criminol. 2022 Mar;19(2):304-321. doi: 10.1177/1477370819896223. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Multiple Discrimination against Female Immigrants Wearing Headscarves.对戴头巾的女性移民的多重歧视。
Ind Labor Relat Rev. 2020 May;73(3):600-627. doi: 10.1177/0019793919875707. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
Radicalization Through the Lens of Situated Affectivity.基于情境情感视角的激进化
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00205. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验