• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Radicalization from a societal perspective.从社会角度看激进化。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1197282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197282. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychological Mechanisms Involved in Radicalization and Extremism. A Rational Emotive Behavioral Conceptualization.激进化和极端主义中涉及的心理机制。一种理性情绪行为概念化。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 6;10:437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00437. eCollection 2019.
3
Radicalization to Violence: A View from Cultural Psychiatry.激进化走向暴力:文化精神病学的视角。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):603-615. doi: 10.1177/13634615211048010. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
4
Radicalization Processes and Transitional Phases in Female and Male Detainees Residing in Dutch Terrorism Wings.荷兰恐怖主义监区中女性和男性被拘留者的激进化过程及过渡阶段
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;13(10):877. doi: 10.3390/bs13100877.
5
A multilevel social neuroscience perspective on radicalization and terrorism.关于激进化与恐怖主义的多层次社会神经科学视角
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Oct;13(5):511-529. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1400462. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
A systematic review of pathways to and processes associated with radicalization and extremism amongst Muslims in Western societies.对西方社会穆斯林群体激进化和极端主义相关途径及过程的系统综述。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;27(1):39-50. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.992008. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
The abortion divide: Exploring the role of exclusion, loss of significance and identity in the radicalization process.堕胎分歧:探究排斥、意义丧失和身份认同在激进化过程中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:1025928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025928. eCollection 2022.
8
The Need to Refocus on the Group as the Site of Radicalization.需要重新关注群体作为激进化的场所。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):327-352. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885870. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
9
The reception of broadcast terrorism: recruitment and radicalisation.广播恐怖主义的接受:招募与激进化。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;29(4):320-326. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1343529.
10
Unfairness in Society and Over Time: Understanding Possible Radicalization of People Protesting on Matters of Climate Change.社会中的不公平与长期存在的问题:理解在气候变化问题上进行抗议的人们可能出现的激进化现象。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:778894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778894. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Psychological Impact of Oppression Using the Trauma Symptoms of Discrimination Scale.使用歧视创伤症状量表理解压迫的心理影响。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2023 Jan 17;7:24705470221149511. doi: 10.1177/24705470221149511. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Risk Matrix for Violent Radicalization: A Machine Learning Approach.暴力激进化风险矩阵:一种机器学习方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:745608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745608. eCollection 2022.
3
Racism in Europe: Characteristics and Intersections With Other Social Categories.欧洲的种族主义:特征及其与其他社会范畴的交叉
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;13:789661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.789661. eCollection 2022.
4
The Traumatizing Impact of Racism in Canadians of Colour.种族主义对有色人种加拿大人造成的创伤性影响。
Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8(2):17-34. doi: 10.1007/s40719-022-00225-5. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances.政治意识形态暴力:聚焦不满情绪。
Eur J Criminol. 2022 Mar;19(2):304-321. doi: 10.1177/1477370819896223. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Multiple Discrimination against Female Immigrants Wearing Headscarves.对戴头巾的女性移民的多重歧视。
Ind Labor Relat Rev. 2020 May;73(3):600-627. doi: 10.1177/0019793919875707. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
Radicalization Through the Lens of Situated Affectivity.基于情境情感视角的激进化
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00205. eCollection 2020.
8
Historical trauma in American Indian/Native Alaska communities: a multilevel framework for exploring impacts on individuals, families, and communities.美国印第安/阿拉斯加原住民社区的历史创伤:一个探索对个人、家庭和社区影响的多层次框架。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Mar;23(3):316-38. doi: 10.1177/0886260507312290.

从社会角度看激进化。

Radicalization from a societal perspective.

作者信息

Shafieioun Delaram, Haq Hina

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1197282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197282. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197282
PMID:37287791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10242143/
Abstract

Studies on radicalization tend to focus on the dynamics of extremist groups and how they exploit grievances of vulnerable individuals. It is imperative, however, to also understand the societal factors that lead to such vulnerabilities and grievances. Our social environment plays a key role in how we view the world and shape our beliefs. By understanding the social dynamics, we can gain insight into the motivations that drive people to extremism. Throughout this paper, we examine the societal factors and processes such as discriminative institutional structures and social norms/practices that can make an individual vulnerable and serve as a driving force for them to join a radical group. To do that, we use the process-oriented psychology of Arnold Mindell and the phenomenology of whiteness of Sara Ahmed as our theoretical framework. These frameworks help us map out the societal dynamics causing individuals to carve social niches out of their current social group and into an extremist group. We use interviews with ex-militants of the radical group, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, to show how certain societal dynamics, such as social injustice, misuse of power, marginalization and discrimination, served as key factors that led these individuals to identify and sympathize with radical ideology. The aim of this paper is to emphasize that, to develop effective preventative measures against recruitment into extremist groups, it is imperative to have a profound understanding of the social dynamics that make an individual susceptible to radicalization in the first place.

摘要

关于激进化的研究往往侧重于极端组织的动态以及它们如何利用弱势群体的不满情绪。然而,同样重要的是要理解导致这些脆弱性和不满情绪的社会因素。我们的社会环境在我们如何看待世界以及塑造我们的信仰方面起着关键作用。通过了解社会动态,我们可以深入了解驱使人们走向极端主义的动机。在本文中,我们研究了社会因素和过程,例如歧视性的制度结构以及社会规范/习俗,这些因素可能使个人变得脆弱,并成为他们加入激进组织的驱动力。为此,我们使用阿诺德·明德尔的过程导向心理学和萨拉·艾哈迈德的白人现象学作为我们的理论框架。这些框架帮助我们梳理出导致个人从当前社会群体中脱离出来并融入极端组织的社会动态。我们通过对激进组织伊拉克和叙利亚伊斯兰国的前武装分子进行访谈,来展示某些社会动态,如社会不公、权力滥用、边缘化和歧视,是如何成为导致这些人认同并同情激进意识形态的关键因素。本文的目的是强调,为了制定有效的预防措施以防止人们加入极端组织,首先必须深刻理解使个人容易激进化的社会动态。