Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Department of Physician Assistant Studies, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317247. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17247.
In the US, improving end-of-life care has become increasingly urgent. Some states have enacted legislation intended to facilitate palliative care delivery for seriously ill patients, but it is unknown whether these laws have any measurable consequences for patient outcomes.
To determine whether US state palliative care legislation is associated with place of death from cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study with a difference-in-differences analysis used information about state legislation combined with death certificate data for 50 US states (from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017) for all decedents who had any type of cancer listed as the underlying cause of death. Data analysis for this study occurred between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022.
Presence of a nonprescriptive (relating to palliative and end-of-life care without prescribing particular clinician actions) or prescriptive (requiring clinicians to offer patients information about care options) palliative care law in the state-year where death occurred.
Multilevel relative risk regression with state modeled as a random effect was used to estimate the likelihood of dying at home or hospice for decedents dying in state-years with a palliative care law compared with decedents dying in state-years without such laws.
This study included 7 547 907 individuals with cancer as the underlying cause of death. Their mean (SD) age was 71 (14) years, and 3 609 146 were women (47.8%). In terms of race and ethnicity, the majority of decedents were White (85.6%) and non-Hispanic (94.1%). During the study period, 553 state-years (85.1%) had no palliative care law, 60 state-years (9.2%) had a nonprescriptive palliative care law, and 37 state-years (5.7%) had a prescriptive palliative care law. A total of 3 780 918 individuals (50.1%) died at home or in hospice. Most decedents (70.8%) died in state-years without a palliative care law, while 15.7% died in state-years with a nonprescriptive law and 13.5% died in state-years with a prescriptive law. Compared with state-years without a palliative care law, the likelihood of dying at home or in hospice was 12% higher for decedents in state-years with a nonprescriptive palliative care law (relative risk, 1.12 [95% CI 1.08-1.16]) and 18% higher for decedents in state-years with a prescriptive palliative care law (relative risk, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.26]).
In this cohort study of decedents from cancer, state palliative care laws were associated with an increased likelihood of dying at home or in hospice. Passage of state palliative care legislation may be an effective policy intervention to increase the number of seriously ill patients who experience their death in such locations.
在美国,改善临终关怀已变得日益紧迫。一些州已经颁布了旨在为重病患者提供姑息治疗的立法,但尚不清楚这些法律对患者的结局是否有任何可衡量的影响。
确定美国州姑息治疗立法是否与癌症患者的死亡地点有关。
设计、设置和参与者:本队列研究采用差异中的差异分析,使用有关州立法的信息以及 50 个州(从 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日)的所有死者的死亡证明数据,这些死者的任何类型的癌症均被列为根本死因。本研究的数据分析于 2021 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日进行。
在死者所在的州年有非规定性(涉及姑息治疗和临终关怀而无需规定临床医生的具体行动)或规定性(要求临床医生向患者提供有关护理选择的信息)姑息治疗法。
使用多水平相对风险回归,将州建模为随机效应,以估计与没有姑息治疗法的州年相比,在有姑息治疗法的州年死亡的死者在家中或临终关怀中死亡的可能性。
本研究纳入了 7547907 名患有癌症作为根本死因的个体。他们的平均(SD)年龄为 71(14)岁,其中 3609146 人为女性(47.8%)。就种族和民族而言,大多数死者为白人(85.6%)和非西班牙裔(94.1%)。在研究期间,553 个州年(85.1%)没有姑息治疗法,60 个州年(9.2%)有非规定性姑息治疗法,37 个州年(5.7%)有规定性姑息治疗法。共有 3780918 人(50.1%)在家中或临终关怀中死亡。大多数死者(70.8%)死于没有姑息治疗法的州年,而 15.7%死于有非规定性姑息治疗法的州年,13.5%死于有规定性姑息治疗法的州年。与没有姑息治疗法的州年相比,有非规定性姑息治疗法的州年中死者在家中或临终关怀中死亡的可能性高 12%(相对风险,1.12[95%CI,1.08-1.16]),有规定性姑息治疗法的州年中死者在家中或临终关怀中死亡的可能性高 18%(相对风险,1.18[95%CI,1.11-1.26])。
在这项针对癌症死者的队列研究中,州姑息治疗法与在家中或临终关怀中死亡的可能性增加有关。通过州姑息治疗立法可能是增加经历此类地点死亡的重病患者数量的有效政策干预措施。