• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专门的心力衰竭诊所与初级保健:NorthStar 试验的基于注册的扩展随访。

Specialized heart failure clinics versus primary care: Extended registry-based follow-up of the NorthStar trial.

机构信息

Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286307. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286307
PMID:37289772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10249840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether continued follow-up in specialized heart failure (HF) clinics after optimization of guideline-directed therapy improves long-term outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

921 medically optimized HFrEF patients enrolled in the NorthStar study were randomly assigned to follow up in a specialized HF clinic or primary care and followed for 10 years using Danish nationwide registries. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. We further assessed the 5-year adherence to prescribed neurohormonal blockade in 5-year survivors. At enrollment, the median age was 69 years, 24,7% were females, and the median NT-proBNP was 1139 pg/ml. During a median follow-up time of 4.1 (Q1-Q3 1.5-10.0) years, the primary outcome occurred in 321 patients (69.8%) randomized to follow-up in specialized HF clinics and 325 patients (70.5%) randomized to follow-up in primary care. The rate of the primary outcome, its individual components, and all-cause death did not differ between groups (primary outcome, hazard ratio 0.96 [95% CI, 0.82-1.12]; cardiovascular death, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]; HF hospitalization, 0.97 [0.82-1.14]; all-cause death, 1.00 [0.83-1.20]). In 5-year survivors (N = 660), the 5-year adherence did not differ between groups for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (p = 0.78), beta-blockers (p = 0.74), or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

HFrEF patients on optimal medical therapy did not benefit from continued follow-up in a specialized HF clinic after initial optimization. Development and implementation of new monitoring strategies are needed.

摘要

背景

在优化指南指导的治疗后,继续在专门的心衰(HF)诊所进行随访是否能改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的长期预后尚不清楚。

方法和结果

921 名接受医学优化的 HFrEF 患者被纳入 NorthStar 研究,并随机分配到专门的 HF 诊所或初级保健进行随访,并使用丹麦全国登记处进行了 10 年的随访。主要结局是 HF 住院或心血管死亡的复合结局。我们进一步评估了 5 年幸存者中神经激素阻滞剂的 5 年依从性。在入组时,中位年龄为 69 岁,24.7%为女性,中位 NT-proBNP 为 1139 pg/ml。在中位随访时间为 4.1 年(Q1-Q3 1.5-10.0)期间,主要结局发生在 321 名(69.8%)随机分配到专门 HF 诊所随访的患者和 325 名(70.5%)随机分配到初级保健随访的患者中。主要结局及其各组成部分和全因死亡的发生率在两组之间没有差异(主要结局,风险比 0.96 [95%CI,0.82-1.12];心血管死亡,1.00 [0.81-1.24];HF 住院,0.97 [0.82-1.14];全因死亡,1.00 [0.83-1.20])。在 5 年幸存者(N=660)中,ACEI(p=0.78)、β受体阻滞剂(p=0.74)或盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(p=0.47)的 5 年依从性在两组之间没有差异。

结论

接受最佳药物治疗的 HFrEF 患者在初始优化后并未从专门的心衰诊所的持续随访中获益。需要开发和实施新的监测策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/acb8e67563f3/pone.0286307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/60b9e72262bb/pone.0286307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/6ad36f2eedd3/pone.0286307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/acb8e67563f3/pone.0286307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/60b9e72262bb/pone.0286307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/6ad36f2eedd3/pone.0286307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497c/10249840/acb8e67563f3/pone.0286307.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Specialized heart failure clinics versus primary care: Extended registry-based follow-up of the NorthStar trial.专门的心力衰竭诊所与初级保健:NorthStar 试验的基于注册的扩展随访。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286307. eCollection 2023.
2
Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study.基于证据的心力衰竭药物治疗的处方模式和 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的结果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1.
3
Assessment of Limitations to Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure From the GUIDE-IT Trial: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.从 GUIDE-IT 试验评估心力衰竭指南指导的药物治疗优化的局限性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):757-764. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0640.
4
Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus and HFrEF: The CHAMP-HF Registry.合并糖尿病与射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者的当代治疗模式与临床结局:CHAMP-HF 注册研究。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;8(6):469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.12.015. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Effect of extended follow-up in a specialized heart failure clinic on adherence to guideline recommended therapy: NorthStar Adherence Study.专门心力衰竭诊所的延长随访对遵医嘱治疗的影响:NorthStar 依从性研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;16(11):1249-55. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.176. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
6
Long-term results of intensified, N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided versus symptom-guided treatment in elderly patients with heart failure: five-year follow-up from TIME-CHF.强化、N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽指导与症状指导治疗老年心力衰竭患者的长期结果:TIME-CHF 的 5 年随访。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):131-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000527. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Impact of Individual Patient Profiles on Adherence to Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: VCOR-HF Study.个体患者特征对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者遵医嘱治疗的影响:VCOR-HF 研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1782-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Clinical Course of Patients With Worsening Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭恶化患者的临床病程。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):935-944. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.049.
9
Physicians' guideline adherence is associated with better prognosis in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the QUALIFY international registry.医生的指南遵循与射血分数降低的心力衰竭门诊患者的更好预后相关:QUALIFY 国际注册研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1414-1423. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.887. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
10
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of macrophage polarization in heart failure and traditional Chinese medicine treatment.巨噬细胞极化在心力衰竭及中医治疗中的作用
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1434654. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1434654. eCollection 2024.
2
The Impact of Specialised Heart Failure Outpatient Care on the Long-Term Application of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and on Prognosis in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.专科心力衰竭门诊护理对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者指南指导药物治疗的长期应用及预后的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 6;14(2):131. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020131.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient profile and outcomes associated with follow-up in specialty vs. primary care in heart failure.心力衰竭患者在专科与初级保健随访中的特征和结局。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;9(2):822-833. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13848. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Non-cardiology vs. cardiology care of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction is associated with lower use of guideline-based care and higher mortality: Observations from The Swedish Heart Failure Registry.心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者的非心脏病学与心脏病学治疗与更低的指南为基础的治疗使用率和更高的死亡率相关:来自瑞典心力衰竭注册研究的观察结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 15;343:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial.
基于血流动力学的心力衰竭管理(GUIDE-HF):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):991-1001. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01754-2. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
5
Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Worsening Heart Failure.索格列净治疗伴有近期恶化心力衰竭的糖尿病患者。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):117-128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030183. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.铁羧基麦芽糖治疗急性心力衰竭出院后缺铁:一项多中心、双盲、随机、对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1895-1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32339-4. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
7
Estimating the Lifetime Benefits of Treatments for Heart Failure.估算心力衰竭治疗的终身获益。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;8(12):984-995. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure.恩格列净治疗心力衰竭的心血管和肾脏结局。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Estimating lifetime benefits of comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a comparative analysis of three randomised controlled trials.估算射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者接受全面疾病修正药物治疗的终生获益:三项随机对照试验的比较分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jul 11;396(10244):121-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30748-0. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.达格列净治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. Epub 2019 Sep 19.