School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B, Moore Ave., Ritter Hall Annex 9th Floor, Room 955, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jun;64:102343. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102343. Epub 2023 May 1.
Psychosocial health varies depending on demographic and clinical factors and the social context in which individuals grow and live. Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations experience health disparities due to systemic factors that privilege cisgender and heterosexual identities. We reviewed the literature on the psychosocial, sociodemographic, and clinical factors in SGM groups with cancer and described the associations among these factors.
We conducted a systematic review according to Fink's methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines in the PubMed, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and LGBTQ+ Life databases. Quantitative articles published in English or Spanish were included. Grey literature and studies with participants in hospice care were excluded. The quality of the publications was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute criticalappraisal tools.
The review included 25 publications. In SGM groups, systemic cancer treatment was associated with worse psychosocial outcomes; and older age, employment, and higher income were associated with better psychosocial outcomes.
SGM groups with cancer are different from their heterosexual cisgender peers in sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical factors. Clinical and sociodemographic factors are associated with psychosocial outcomes among SGM individuals with cancer.
心理社会健康状况因人口统计学和临床因素以及个体成长和生活的社会环境而异。性少数群体(SGM)由于优先考虑顺性别和异性恋身份的系统因素而经历健康差距。我们回顾了癌症 SGM 群体的心理社会、社会人口学和临床因素的文献,并描述了这些因素之间的关联。
我们根据芬克的方法和《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》的指南,在 PubMed、PsycInfo、护理和联合健康文献累积索引以及 LGBTQ+Life 数据库中进行了系统评价。纳入发表在英语或西班牙语的定量文章。排除灰色文献和临终关怀参与者的研究。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具评估出版物的质量。
综述包括 25 篇出版物。在 SGM 群体中,系统的癌症治疗与较差的心理社会结果相关;而年龄较大、就业和较高收入与较好的心理社会结果相关。
癌症 SGM 群体在社会人口学、心理社会和临床因素方面与异性恋顺性别同龄人不同。临床和社会人口学因素与癌症 SGM 个体的心理社会结果相关。