Suppr超能文献

基于电话的主动母乳喂养同伴支持是否具有成本效益?“早期母乳喂养电话咨询”(RUBY)随机对照试验的试验内成本效益分析。

Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the 'Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY' (RUBY) randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Midwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 8;13(6):e067049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 'Ringing Up about Breastfeeding earlY' (RUBY) randomised controlled trial showed increased breastfeeding at 6 months in participants who received the proactive telephone-based peer support breastfeeding intervention compared with participants allocated to receive standard care and supports. The present study aimed to evaluate if the intervention was cost-effective.

DESIGN

A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.

SETTING

Three metropolitan maternity services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

First time mothers intending to breastfeed their infant (1152) and peer volunteers (246).

INTERVENTION

The intervention comprised proactive telephone-based support from a peer volunteer from early postpartum up to 6 months. Participants were allocated to usual care (n=578) or the intervention (n=574).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs during a 6-month follow-up period including individual healthcare, breastfeeding support and intervention costs in all participants, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

Costs per mother supported were valued at $263.75 (or $90.33 excluding costs of donated volunteer time). There was no difference between the two arms in costs for infant and mothers in healthcare and breastfeeding support costs. These figures result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4146 ($1393 if volunteer time excluded) per additional mother breast feeding at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Considering the significant improvement in breastfeeding outcomes, this intervention is potentially cost-effective. These findings, along with the high value placed on the intervention by women and peer volunteers provides robust evidence to upscale the implementation of this intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12612001024831.

摘要

目的

“早期母乳喂养电话随访”(RUBY)随机对照试验显示,与接受标准护理和支持的参与者相比,接受积极主动的基于电话的同伴支持母乳喂养干预的参与者在 6 个月时母乳喂养率增加。本研究旨在评估该干预措施是否具有成本效益。

设计

试验内成本效益分析。

设置

澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本的三个大都市产妇服务机构。

参与者

打算母乳喂养婴儿的初产妇(1152 名)和同伴志愿者(246 名)。

干预措施

该干预措施包括从产后早期开始由同伴志愿者提供积极主动的电话支持,直至 6 个月。参与者被分配到常规护理组(n=578)或干预组(n=574)。

主要观察指标

6 个月随访期间的成本,包括所有参与者的个人医疗保健、母乳喂养支持和干预成本,以及增量成本效益比。

结果

每位受支持母亲的成本价值为 263.75 美元(如果不包括志愿者时间捐赠成本,则为 90.33 美元)。在母婴医疗保健和母乳喂养支持成本方面,两组之间没有差异。这些数字导致每增加一位母亲在 6 个月时母乳喂养,增量成本效益比为 4146 美元(如果不包括志愿者时间,则为 1393 美元)。

结论

考虑到母乳喂养结果的显著改善,该干预措施具有潜在的成本效益。这些发现,以及女性和同伴志愿者对干预措施的高度重视,为扩大该干预措施的实施提供了有力证据。

试验注册号

ACTRN12612001024831。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/10254963/76ea7ab30858/bmjopen-2022-067049f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验