Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dyslexia. 2023 Aug;29(3):235-254. doi: 10.1002/dys.1745. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
This study had two overriding goals, (1) examine the stability of rapid automatized naming (RAN) in predicting reading achievement while taking into account two other frequently studied constructs, phonological awareness and fluid intelligence (Gf) and (2) examine the predictive power of RAN measured at age 4 on reading ability. The stable pattern of RAN development found in a previously reported growth model was challenged by relating phonological awareness and Gf to the model. Children (N = 364) were followed from age 4 to age 10. At age 4, Gf related strongly to phonological awareness, which in turn related strongly to RAN. The relations between the RAN measures over time was largely unaffected by the inclusion of Gf and phonological awareness. RAN, Gf and phonological awareness at age 4 independently predicted latent factors reflecting reading-related abilities in grade 1 and grade 4. However, when scrutinizing type of reading measure in grade 4, Gf, phonological awareness and RAN at age 4 predicted both spelling and reading fluency, whereas RAN in grade 2 did not predict spelling but was the strongest predictor of reading fluency.
(1)在考虑另外两个经常研究的结构,语音意识和流体智力(Gf)的情况下,检查快速自动命名(RAN)在预测阅读成绩方面的稳定性;(2)检验在 4 岁时测量的 RAN 对阅读能力的预测能力。通过将语音意识和 Gf 与模型相关联,挑战了之前报告的增长模型中发现的 RAN 发展稳定模式。从 4 岁到 10 岁,对 364 名儿童进行了跟踪研究。在 4 岁时,Gf 与语音意识密切相关,而语音意识又与 RAN 密切相关。随着时间的推移,RAN 之间的关系基本不受 Gf 和语音意识的影响。4 岁时的 RAN、Gf 和语音意识独立预测了 1 年级和 4 年级反映阅读相关能力的潜在因素。然而,当仔细研究 4 年级的阅读测量类型时,4 岁时的 Gf、语音意识和 RAN 预测了拼写和阅读流畅性,而 2 年级的 RAN 则不能预测拼写,但却是阅读流畅性的最强预测指标。