• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于项目反应理论设计的人脸识别能力测试。

Face identification proficiency test designed using item response theory.

机构信息

The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1244-1259. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02092-7. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02092-7
PMID:37296324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10991046/
Abstract

Measures of face-identification proficiency are essential to ensure accurate and consistent performance by professional forensic face examiners and others who perform face-identification tasks in applied scenarios. Current proficiency tests rely on static sets of stimulus items and so cannot be administered validly to the same individual multiple times. To create a proficiency test, a large number of items of "known" difficulty must be assembled. Multiple tests of equal difficulty can be constructed then using subsets of items. We introduce the Triad Identity Matching (TIM) test and evaluate it using item response theory (IRT). Participants view face-image "triads" (N = 225) (two images of one identity, one image of a different identity) and select the different identity. In Experiment 3, university students (N = 197) showed wide-ranging accuracy on the TIM test, and IRT modeling demonstrated that the TIM items span various difficulty levels. In Experiment 3, we used IRT-based item metrics to partition the test into subsets of specific difficulties. Simulations showed that subsets of the TIM items yielded reliable estimates of subject ability. In Experiments 3a and b, we found that the student-derived IRT model reliably evaluated the ability of non-student participants and that ability generalized across different test sessions. In Experiment 3c, we show that TIM test performance correlates with other common face-recognition tests. In summary, the TIM test provides a starting point for developing a framework that is flexible and calibrated to measure proficiency across various ability levels (e.g., professionals or populations with face-processing deficits).

摘要

面部识别能力的衡量标准对于确保专业法医面部识别员和其他在应用场景中执行面部识别任务的人员的准确和一致表现至关重要。目前的熟练程度测试依赖于静态的刺激项目集,因此不能对同一个人进行多次有效测试。为了创建一个熟练程度测试,必须组装大量“已知”难度的项目。然后可以使用项目子集构建多个具有相同难度的测试。我们介绍了三元身份匹配(TIM)测试,并使用项目反应理论(IRT)对其进行了评估。参与者查看面部图像“三元组”(N=225)(一个身份的两个图像,一个不同身份的一个图像)并选择不同的身份。在实验 3 中,大学生(N=197)在 TIM 测试中表现出广泛的准确性,IRT 建模表明 TIM 项目涵盖了各种难度水平。在实验 3 中,我们使用基于 IRT 的项目指标将测试分为特定难度的子集。模拟表明,TIM 项目的子集可以可靠地评估受试者的能力。在实验 3a 和 3b 中,我们发现学生衍生的 IRT 模型可靠地评估了非学生参与者的能力,并且能力在不同的测试会议中具有通用性。在实验 3c 中,我们表明 TIM 测试性能与其他常见的面部识别测试相关。总之,TIM 测试为开发一个灵活且经过校准的框架提供了起点,可以衡量各种能力水平(例如,专业人员或面部处理缺陷人群)的熟练程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/dc928f39a1f9/13428_2023_2092_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/9af35bc90534/13428_2023_2092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/0ca29ed88ede/13428_2023_2092_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/6eb4269569f2/13428_2023_2092_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/d6297aad3538/13428_2023_2092_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/c31938bc0879/13428_2023_2092_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/a6dd1dbacfd0/13428_2023_2092_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/9b4fa73dd8f5/13428_2023_2092_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/fb2aecd37510/13428_2023_2092_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/e47483d80721/13428_2023_2092_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/dc928f39a1f9/13428_2023_2092_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/9af35bc90534/13428_2023_2092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/0ca29ed88ede/13428_2023_2092_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/6eb4269569f2/13428_2023_2092_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/d6297aad3538/13428_2023_2092_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/c31938bc0879/13428_2023_2092_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/a6dd1dbacfd0/13428_2023_2092_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/9b4fa73dd8f5/13428_2023_2092_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/fb2aecd37510/13428_2023_2092_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/e47483d80721/13428_2023_2092_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/028d/10991046/dc928f39a1f9/13428_2023_2092_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Face identification proficiency test designed using item response theory.基于项目反应理论设计的人脸识别能力测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1244-1259. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02092-7. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
2
Confidence judgments are associated with face identification accuracy: Findings from a confidence forced-choice task.信心判断与面部识别准确性有关:来自信心迫选任务的发现。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4118-4127. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02009-w. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.两种具有挑战性的生态条件下面部匹配测试的常模数据。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Feb 19;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0205-0.
4
Evaluating the feature comparison strategy for forensic face identification.评估用于法医面部识别的特征比较策略。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Mar;23(1):47-58. doi: 10.1037/xap0000108. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
5
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
6
Unidimensional IRT Item Parameter Estimates Across Equivalent Test Forms With Confounding Specifications Within Dimensions.具有维度内混杂规范的等效测试形式间的单维项目反应理论项目参数估计
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):258-279. doi: 10.1177/0013164415589756. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Measuring student's proficiency in MOOCs: multiple attempts extensions for the Rasch model.衡量学生在大规模开放在线课程中的熟练程度:Rasch模型的多次尝试扩展
Heliyon. 2018 Dec 4;4(12):e01003. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01003. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
The Oxford Face Matching Test: A non-biased test of the full range of individual differences in face perception.牛津面部匹配测试:对个体面部感知全范围差异的非偏倚测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):158-173. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01609-2. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
State-Aware Deep Item Response Theory using student facial features.使用学生面部特征的状态感知深度项目反应理论。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jan 4;6:1324279. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1324279. eCollection 2023.
10
GFMT2: A psychometric measure of face matching ability.GFMT2:一种面部匹配能力的心理测量学度量。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):252-260. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01638-x. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing a cross-race face identity triad test.构建一个跨种族面部身份三联测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 5;57(10):278. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02809-w.
2
Confidence judgments are associated with face identification accuracy: Findings from a confidence forced-choice task.信心判断与面部识别准确性有关:来自信心迫选任务的发现。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4118-4127. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02009-w. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
We need to talk about super-recognizers Invited commentary on: Ramon, M., Bobak, A. K., & White, D. Super-recognizers: From the lab to the world and back again. British Journal of Psychology.我们需要谈谈超级识别者 特邀评论:拉蒙、M.、博巴克、A. K. 和怀特、D. 超级识别者:从实验室到世界再到实验室。《英国心理学杂志》。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Aug;110(3):492-494. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12395. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
2
Super-recognizers: From the lab to the world and back again.超级识别者:从实验室到现实世界,再回到实验室。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Aug;110(3):461-479. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12368. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Do professional facial image comparison training courses work?
职业面部图像比对训练课程有效吗?
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211037. eCollection 2019.
4
Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks.超级识别者的实际表现:来自面部匹配和面部记忆任务的证据。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):81-91. doi: 10.1002/acp.3170. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
A signal detection-item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures.一种用于评估神经心理学测量的信号检测-项目反应理论模型。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Oct;40(8):745-760. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1427699. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
Age-related differential item functioning in tests of face and car recognition ability.面部和汽车识别能力测试中与年龄相关的项目功能差异
J Vis. 2018 Jan 1;18(1):2. doi: 10.1167/18.1.2.
7
General and specific factors in the processing of faces.面部处理中的一般因素和特定因素。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).剑桥面部记忆测试(CFMT)的项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):552-66. doi: 10.1037/pas0000068. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
Evaluating training methods for facial image comparison: the face shape strategy does not work.评估面部图像比较的训练方法:面部形状策略不起作用。
Perception. 2014;43(2-3):214-8. doi: 10.1068/p7676.
10
Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: the example of face recognition.捕捉特定能力作为人类个体差异的窗口:以人脸识别为例。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(5-6):360-92. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.753433.