Institute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland.
Department of Animal Nutrition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Instytucka 3 Str., 05-110 Jabłonna, Poland.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 5;24(11):9759. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119759.
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) appear to be a sensible competitor to conventional fertilization, including mineral fertilizers and chemical plant protection products. Undoubtedly, one of the most interesting bacteria exhibiting plant-stimulating traits is, more widely known as a pathogen, . To date, several environmentally safe strains of have been isolated and described, including WSE01, MEN8, YL6, SA1, ALT1, ERBP, GGBSTD1, AK1, AR156, C1L, and T4S. These strains have been studied under growth chamber, greenhouse, and field conditions and have shown many significant traits, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase production or phosphate solubilization, which allows direct plant growth promotion. It includes an increase in biometrics traits, chemical element content (e.g., N, P, and K), and biologically active substances content or activity, e.g., antioxidant enzymes and total soluble sugar. Hence, has supported the growth of plant species such as soybean, maize, rice, and wheat. Importantly, some strains can also promote plant growth under abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, and heavy metal pollution. In addition, strains produced extracellular enzymes and antibiotic lipopeptides or triggered induced systemic resistance, which allows indirect stimulation of plant growth. As far as biocontrol is concerned, these PGPB can suppress the development of agriculturally important phytopathogens, including bacterial phytopathogens (e.g., , , and ), fungal phytopathogens (e.g., , , and ), and other phytopathogenic organisms (e.g., (Nematoda) and (Protozoa)). In conclusion, it should be noted that there are still few studies on the effectiveness of under field conditions, particularly, there is a lack of comprehensive analyses comparing the PGP effects of and mineral fertilizers, which should be reduced in favor of decreasing the use of mineral fertilizers. It is also worth mentioning that there are still very few studies on the impact of on the indigenous microbiota and its persistence after application to soil. Further studies would help to understand the interactions between and indigenous microbiota, subsequently contributing to increasing its effectiveness in promoting plant growth.
植物促生菌(PGPB)似乎是传统施肥的合理替代品,包括矿物肥料和化学植保产品。毫无疑问,最有趣的具有植物刺激特性的细菌之一是,更广泛地称为病原体,。迄今为止,已经分离和描述了几种环境安全的 菌株,包括 WSE01、MEN8、YL6、SA1、ALT1、ERBP、GGBSTD1、AK1、AR156、C1L 和 T4S。这些菌株已经在生长室、温室和田间条件下进行了研究,表现出了许多显著的特性,包括吲哚-3-乙酸(IAA)和氨甲酰磷酸 1-羧酸(ACC)脱氨酶的产生或磷酸盐的溶解,这允许直接促进植物生长。它包括生物计量特性、化学元素含量(例如,N、P 和 K)和生物活性物质含量或活性的增加,例如抗氧化酶和总可溶性糖。因此, 促进了大豆、玉米、水稻和小麦等植物物种的生长。重要的是,一些 菌株还可以在非生物胁迫下促进植物生长,包括干旱、盐度和重金属污染。此外, 菌株产生细胞外酶和抗生素脂肽或触发诱导的系统抗性,这允许间接刺激植物生长。就生物防治而言,这些 PGPB 可以抑制农业上重要的植物病原体的发展,包括细菌植物病原体(例如 、 、 和 )、真菌植物病原体(例如 、 、 和 )和其他植物病原生物(例如 (线虫)和 (原生动物))。总之,应该注意的是,目前关于 在田间条件下的有效性的研究仍然很少,特别是缺乏对 和矿物肥料的促生效果进行全面分析的研究,这应该减少,以有利于减少矿物肥料的使用。值得一提的是,目前关于 对土著微生物群落的影响及其在施用于土壤后的持久性的研究仍然很少。进一步的研究将有助于了解 与土著微生物群落之间的相互作用,从而有助于提高其促进植物生长的效果。