• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观点:制定基于营养素的蛋白质质量框架。

Perspective: Developing a Nutrient-Based Framework for Protein Quality.

机构信息

Nutrient Institute LLC, Reno, NV, United States.

Nutrient Institute LLC, Reno, NV, United States.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2023 Aug;153(8):2137-2146. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.004
PMID:37301285
Abstract

The future of precision nutrition requires treating amino acids as essential nutrients. Currently, recognition of essential amino acid requirements is embedded within a generalized measure of protein quality known as the PDCAAS (Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score). Calculating the PDCAAS includes the FAO/WHO/UNU amino acid score, which is based on the limiting amino acid in a food, that is, the single amino acid with the lowest concentration compared to the reference standard. That "limiting" amino acid score is then multiplied by a bioavailability factor to obtain the PDCAAS, which ranks proteins from 0.0 (poor quality) to 1.0 (high quality). However, the PDCAAS has multiple limitations: it only allows for direct protein quality comparison between 2 proteins, and it is not scalable, transparent, or additive. We therefore propose that shifting the protein quality evaluation paradigm from the current generalized perspective to a precision nutrition focus treating amino acids as unique, metabolically active nutrients will be valuable for multiple areas of science and public health. We report the development and validation of the Essential Amino Acid 9 (EAA-9) score, an innovative, nutrient-based protein quality scoring framework. EAA-9 scores can be used to ensure that dietary recommendations for each essential amino acid are met. The EAA-9 scoring framework also offers the advantages of being additive and, perhaps most importantly, allows for personalization of essential amino acid needs based on age or metabolic conditions. Comparisons of the EAA-9 score with PDCAAS demonstrated the validity of the EAA-9 framework, and practical applications demonstrated that the EAA-9 framework is a powerful tool for precision nutrition applications.

摘要

精准营养的未来需要将氨基酸视为必需营养素。目前,必需氨基酸需求的认识是嵌入在一种称为 PDCAAS(蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分)的通用蛋白质质量衡量标准中的。计算 PDCAAS 包括 FAO/WHO/UNU 氨基酸评分,它基于食物中的限制氨基酸,即与参考标准相比浓度最低的单个氨基酸。然后,将“限制”氨基酸评分乘以生物利用度因子以获得 PDCAAS,该评分将蛋白质从 0.0(质量差)到 1.0(质量高)进行排名。然而,PDCAAS 存在多个局限性:它仅允许在 2 种蛋白质之间直接进行蛋白质质量比较,并且不可扩展、不透明或不可加。因此,我们建议将蛋白质质量评估范式从当前的广义视角转变为以精准营养为重点,将氨基酸视为独特的、具有代谢活性的营养素,这将对多个科学和公共卫生领域具有价值。我们报告了必需氨基酸 9(EAA-9)评分的开发和验证,这是一种创新的、基于营养素的蛋白质质量评分框架。EAA-9 评分可用于确保满足每个必需氨基酸的饮食推荐。EAA-9 评分框架还具有可加性的优点,也许最重要的是,它允许根据年龄或代谢状况对必需氨基酸需求进行个性化调整。EAA-9 评分与 PDCAAS 的比较证明了 EAA-9 框架的有效性,实际应用表明 EAA-9 框架是精准营养应用的有力工具。

相似文献

1
Perspective: Developing a Nutrient-Based Framework for Protein Quality.观点:制定基于营养素的蛋白质质量框架。
J Nutr. 2023 Aug;153(8):2137-2146. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Background on international activities on protein quality assessment of foods.食品蛋白质质量评估国际活动背景。
Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S168-82. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002383.
3
Protein quality evaluation twenty years after the introduction of the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score method.蛋白质消化率校正后的氨基酸评分法引入二十年后的蛋白质质量评价。
Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S183-211. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002309.
4
Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats.蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分和可消化必需氨基酸评分以不同方式描述生长雄性大鼠的蛋白质质量。
J Nutr. 2015 Feb;145(2):372-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.195438. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
5
The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score.蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分
J Nutr. 2000 Jul;130(7):1865S-7S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.7.1865S.
6
Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) in oat protein concentrate measured in 20- to 30-kilogram pigs.在20至30千克的猪中测定的燕麦浓缩蛋白中的可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)和蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)。
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jan;98(1):410-414. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8457. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Advantages and limitations of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) as a method for evaluating protein quality in human diets.蛋白质消化率校正后的氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)作为评价人类饮食中蛋白质质量的方法的优缺点。
Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S333-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002541.
8
Research Approaches and Methods for Evaluating the Protein Quality of Human Foods Proposed by an FAO Expert Working Group in 2014.2014年粮农组织专家工作组提出的评估人类食物蛋白质质量的研究方法和手段
J Nutr. 2016 May;146(5):929-32. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.222109. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
9
Potential impact of the digestible indispensable amino acid score as a measure of protein quality on dietary regulations and health.可消化必需氨基酸评分作为蛋白质质量衡量指标对饮食调控和健康的潜在影响。
Nutr Rev. 2017 Aug 1;75(8):658-667. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux025.
10
The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score method overestimates quality of proteins containing antinutritional factors and of poorly digestible proteins supplemented with limiting amino acids in rats.蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分法高估了含有抗营养因子的蛋白质以及在大鼠中补充了限制性氨基酸的难消化蛋白质的质量。
J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5):758-64. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.5.758.

引用本文的文献

1
The Biological Value of Proteins for Pediatric Growth and Development: A Narrative Review.蛋白质对儿童生长发育的生物学价值:一篇叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 4;17(13):2221. doi: 10.3390/nu17132221.
2
Validation with the Dynamic Prediction Model of Protein and Amino Acid Requirements for Growth Performance and Health in Layer Chicks.蛋雏鸡生长性能和健康的蛋白质及氨基酸需要量动态预测模型的验证
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;15(13):1968. doi: 10.3390/ani15131968.
3
Design and Implementation of the Protein-Distinct Macronutrient-Equivalent Diet (PRODMED) Study: An Eighteen-Week Randomized Crossover Feeding Trial Among Free-Living Rural Older Adults.
蛋白质-不同常量营养素等效饮食(PRODMED)研究的设计与实施:一项针对自由生活的农村老年人的为期18周的随机交叉喂养试验。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Mar 24;9(5):104588. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.104588. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Achieving High Protein Quality Is a Challenge in Vegan Diets: A Narrative Review.在纯素饮食中实现高蛋白质量是一项挑战:叙述性综述
Nutr Rev. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae176.
5
Plant-based seafood alternatives: Current insights on the nutrition, protein-flavour interactions, and the processing of these foods.植物性海鲜替代品:关于这些食品的营养、蛋白质与风味相互作用以及加工的当前见解。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Sep 17;9:100860. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100860. eCollection 2024.
6
Meal Protein Quality Score: A Novel Tool to Evaluate Protein Quantity and Quality of Meals.膳食蛋白质质量评分:一种评估膳食蛋白质数量和质量的新工具。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Aug 17;8(9):104439. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104439. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS): 10 years on.可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS):十年回顾。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 3;11:1389719. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389719. eCollection 2024.
8
Impacts of protein quantity and distribution on body composition.蛋白质数量和分布对身体成分的影响。
Front Nutr. 2024 May 3;11:1388986. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1388986. eCollection 2024.