National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915003. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003.
Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness.
To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP prescribing.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey audits from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Crude estimates of appropriateness were adjusted for factors included in the model by calculating estimated marginal means and presented as adjusted-appropriateness with 95% confidence intervals.
Adjusted appropriateness and factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions.
A total of 9351 surgical episodes and 15 395 prescriptions (10 740 procedural and 4655 postprocedural) were analyzed. Crude appropriateness of total prescriptions was 48.7% (7492 prescriptions). The adjusted appropriateness of each surgical procedure group was low for procedural SAP, ranging from 33.7% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.2%) for dentoalveolar surgery to 68.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-74.5%) for neurosurgery. The adjusted appropriateness of postprocedural prescriptions was also low, ranging from 21.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.7%) for breast surgery to 58.7% (95% CI, 47.9%-69.4%) for ophthalmological procedures. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural SAP was incorrect timing (44.9%), while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural SAP (54.3%).
High rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use were demonstrated across all surgical specialties. Reasons for inappropriateness, such as timing and duration, varied according to the type of SAP and surgical specialty. These findings highlight the need for improvement in SAP prescribing and suggest potential targeted areas for action.
外科抗菌预防(SAP)是医院中抗生素使用的常见指征,且与不适当用药的高发生率有关。
描述 SAP 处方实践,并评估与 SAP 处方适当性相关的医院、手术和患者因素。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、全国性的质量改进研究,对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日期间通过澳大利亚医院的外科国家抗菌药物使用调查审计收集的数据进行回顾性分析。使用多变量逻辑回归分析数据。通过计算模型中包含的因素的估计边际均值来调整适当性的粗略估计,并以 95%置信区间表示调整后的适当性。
调整后的适当性和与不适当处方相关的因素。
共分析了 9351 例手术和 15395 份处方(10740 份手术和 4655 份术后)。总处方的粗适当率为 48.7%(7492 份)。每个手术程序组的 SAP 调整后适当性较低,从牙科和牙槽外科的 33.7%(95%CI,26.3%-41.2%)到神经外科的 68.9%(95%CI,63.2%-74.5%)。术后处方的调整后适当性也较低,从乳房手术的 21.5%(95%CI,13.4%-29.7%)到眼科手术的 58.7%(95%CI,47.9%-69.4%)。不适当的手术 SAP 最常见的原因是时机不正确(44.9%),而持续时间超过 24 小时是不适当的术后 SAP 的最常见原因(54.3%)。
所有外科专业都显示出高比例的不适当的手术和术后抗菌药物使用。不适当的原因,如时机和持续时间,根据 SAP 的类型和外科专业而有所不同。这些发现强调了需要改进 SAP 处方,并提出了潜在的行动重点。