Suppr超能文献

探讨攀岩者在最大等长手指悬垂时,各种握姿下前臂肌肉协调性及训练应用。

Exploring forearm muscle coordination and training applications of various grip positions during maximal isometric finger dead-hangs in rock climbers.

机构信息

Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2023 Jun 5;11:e15464. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15464. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maximal isometric finger dead-hangs are used in rock climbing to strengthen finger flexors. Although various grip positions are often used when performing finger dead-hangs, little is known regarding how these grip positions can affect forearm muscle activity. Understanding how forearm muscles are recruited during dead-hangs could help foreseeing the potential for training of different grip positions. The aim of the present study was to explore the training applications of the various grip positions by comparing the activity of forearm muscles during maximal dead-hangs in rock climbers.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Twenty-five climbers performed maximal dead-hangs in three climbing-specific grip positions: CRIMP, SLOPE, and SLOPER. We recorded the maximal loads used and the sEMG of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and the extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Individual and global (sum of all muscles) root mean square (RMS) and neuromuscular efficiency (NME) values were computed. Repeated measures analysis were performed to assess grip differences ( < 0.05).

RESULTS

SLOPER showed the largest maximal load values among the three grip positions ( < 0.001,  ≥ 2.772). Greater global ( ≤ 0.044,  ≥ 0.268), FDS ( ≤ 0.005,  ≥ 0.277), and FCR ( < 0.001,  ≥ 1.049) activity was observed for the SLOPER compared to CRIMP and SLOPE, while EDC ( ≤ 0.005,  ≥ 0.505) showed lower activity in the SLOPER compared to the other two grip positions. SLOPER presented the highest global ( < 0.001,  ≥ 0.629), FDP ( < 0.001, ≥ 0.777), FDS (only CRIMP SLOPER: < 0.001, = 0.140), and EDC NME ( < 0.001, ≥ 1.194). The CRIMP showed greater FDS activity ( = 0.001, = 0.386) and lower NME ( = 0.003, = 0.125) compared to SLOPE.

CONCLUSIONS

These results revealed that, under maximum intensity conditions, SLOPER could stimulate the FDS and FCR better than the other grip positions at the expense of using greater loads. Similarly, maximum CRIMP dead-hang could better stimulate the FDS than the SLOPE, even when using similar loads.

摘要

背景

最大等长手指悬垂常用于攀岩运动中,以增强手指屈肌。尽管在进行手指悬垂时经常使用各种握姿,但对于这些握姿如何影响前臂肌肉活动知之甚少。了解悬垂时前臂肌肉的募集情况可以帮助预测不同握姿的训练潜力。本研究的目的是通过比较攀岩者在三种特定于攀岩的握姿(CRIMP、SLOPE 和 SLOPER)下进行最大悬垂时的前臂肌肉活动,探讨各种握姿的训练应用。

材料与方法

25 名攀岩者在三种特定于攀岩的握姿(CRIMP、SLOPE 和 SLOPER)下进行最大悬垂。我们记录了使用的最大负荷以及指深屈肌(FDP)、指浅屈肌(FDS)、桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)和指伸肌(EDC)的表面肌电图(sEMG)。计算了个体和全局(所有肌肉的总和)均方根(RMS)和神经肌肉效率(NME)值。进行重复测量分析以评估握姿差异(<0.05)。

结果

SLOPER 在三种握姿中显示出最大的最大负荷值(<0.001,≥2.772)。与 CRIMP 和 SLOPE 相比,SLOPER 显示出更大的全局(≤0.044,≥0.268)、FDS(≤0.005,≥0.277)和 FCR(<0.001,≥1.049)活动,而 EDC(≤0.005,≥0.505)在 SLOPER 中的活动低于其他两种握姿。SLOPER 呈现出最高的全局(<0.001,≥0.629)、FDP(<0.001,≥0.777)、FDS(仅 CRIMP 和 SLOPER:<0.001,=0.140)和 EDC NME(<0.001,≥1.194)。与 SLOPE 相比,CRIMP 显示出更大的 FDS 活动(=0.001,=0.386)和更低的 NME(=0.003,=0.125)。

结论

这些结果表明,在最大强度条件下,SLOPER 可以比其他握姿更好地刺激 FDS 和 FCR,但代价是使用更大的负荷。同样,最大的 CRIMP 悬垂可以比 SLOPE 更好地刺激 FDS,即使使用相似的负荷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c81/10249616/415c1bfb4bfc/peerj-11-15464-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验