Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Microbiome. 2023 Jun 13;11(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01449-y.
Characterization of microbial activity is essential to the understanding of the basic biology of microbial communities, as the function of a microbiome is defined by its biochemically active ("viable") community members. Current sequence-based technologies can rarely differentiate microbial activity, due to their inability to distinguish live and dead sourced DNA. As a result, our understanding of microbial community structures and the potential mechanisms of transmission between humans and our surrounding environments remains incomplete. As a potential solution, 16S rRNA transcript-based amplicon sequencing (16S-RNA-seq) has been proposed as a reliable methodology to characterize the active components of a microbiome, but its efficacy has not been evaluated systematically. Here, we present our work to benchmark RNA-based amplicon sequencing for activity assessment in synthetic and environmentally sourced microbial communities.
In synthetic mixtures of living and heat-killed Escherichia coli and Streptococcus sanguinis, 16S-RNA-seq successfully reconstructed the active compositions of the communities. However, in the realistic environmental samples, no significant compositional differences were observed in RNA ("actively transcribed - active") vs. DNA ("whole" communities) spiked with E. coli controls, suggesting that this methodology is not appropriate for activity assessment in complex communities. The results were slightly different when validated in environmental samples of similar origins (i.e., from Boston subway systems), where samples were differentiated both by environment type as well as by library type, though compositional dissimilarities between DNA and RNA samples remained low (Bray-Curtis distance median: 0.34-0.49). To improve the interpretation of 16S-RNA-seq results, we compared our results with previous studies and found that 16S-RNA-seq suggests taxon-wise viability trends (i.e., specific taxa are universally more or less likely to be viable compared to others) in samples of similar origins.
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of 16S-RNA-seq for viability assessment in synthetic and complex microbial communities. The results found that while 16S-RNA-seq was able to semi-quantify microbial viability in relatively simple communities, it only suggests a taxon-dependent "relative" viability in realistic communities. Video Abstract.
微生物活性的特征对于理解微生物群落的基本生物学至关重要,因为微生物组的功能由其具有生物化学活性(“存活”)的群落成员定义。由于无法区分活源和死源 DNA,当前基于序列的技术很少能够区分微生物活性。因此,我们对微生物群落结构的理解以及人类与其周围环境之间潜在的传播机制仍然不完整。作为一种潜在的解决方案,基于 16S rRNA 转录物的扩增子测序(16S-RNA-seq)已被提议作为一种可靠的方法来描述微生物组的活性成分,但尚未对其进行系统评估。在这里,我们展示了我们在合成和环境来源的微生物群落中用于评估活性的基于 RNA 的扩增子测序的基准工作。
在活的和热灭活的大肠杆菌和酿脓链球菌的合成混合物中,16S-RNA-seq 成功地重建了群落的活性组成。然而,在实际的环境样本中,用大肠杆菌对照物进行 RNA(“活跃转录 - 活性”)与 DNA(“整个”群落)的加标样本中未观察到显著的组成差异,这表明该方法不适合复杂群落的活性评估。在具有相似来源的环境样本中进行验证时,结果略有不同(即来自波士顿地铁系统),其中根据环境类型以及文库类型对样本进行了区分,尽管 DNA 和 RNA 样本之间的组成差异仍然较低(Bray-Curtis 距离中位数:0.34-0.49)。为了提高对 16S-RNA-seq 结果的解释,我们将我们的结果与以前的研究进行了比较,发现 16S-RNA-seq 表明在具有相似来源的样本中,按分类群划分的存活趋势(即,与其他分类群相比,特定分类群更有可能或不太可能具有生存能力)。
本研究全面评估了 16S-RNA-seq 在合成和复杂微生物群落中的生存能力评估。结果发现,虽然 16S-RNA-seq 能够在相对简单的群落中半定量微生物的生存能力,但它仅在实际群落中暗示了一种基于分类群的“相对”生存能力。