Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Aug;38(8):1045-1061. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4868. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
Major achievements in bone research have always relied on animal models and in vitro systems derived from patient and animal material. However, the use of animals in research has drawn intense ethical debate and the complete abolition of animal experimentation is demanded by fractions of the population. This phenomenon is enhanced by the reproducibility crisis in science and the advance of in vitro and in silico techniques. 3D culture, organ-on-a-chip, and computer models have improved enormously over the last few years. Nevertheless, the overall complexity of bone tissue cross-talk and the systemic and local regulation of bone physiology can often only be addressed in entire vertebrates. Powerful genetic methods such as conditional mutagenesis, lineage tracing, and modeling of the diseases enhanced the understanding of the entire skeletal system. In this review endorsed by the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS), a working group of investigators from Europe and the US provides an overview of the strengths and limitations of experimental animal models, including rodents, fish, and large animals, as well the potential and shortcomings of in vitro and in silico technologies in skeletal research. We propose that the proper combination of the right animal model for a specific hypothesis and state-of-the-art in vitro and/or in silico technology is essential to solving remaining important questions in bone research. This is crucial for executing most efficiently the 3R principles to reduce, refine, and replace animal experimentation, for enhancing our knowledge of skeletal biology, and for the treatment of bone diseases that affect a large part of society. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
在骨骼研究方面的重大进展一直依赖于动物模型和源自患者与动物材料的体外系统。然而,动物在研究中的应用引起了激烈的伦理争论,并且有一部分人要求完全废除动物实验。这种现象因科学中的可重复性危机以及体外和计算机技术的进步而加剧。在过去的几年中,3D 培养、器官芯片和计算机模型得到了极大的改进。然而,骨骼组织相互作用的整体复杂性以及骨骼生理学的全身和局部调节通常只能在整个脊椎动物中解决。强大的遗传方法,如条件性突变、谱系追踪以及疾病建模,增强了对整个骨骼系统的理解。在这篇由欧洲钙化组织学会(ECTS)认可的综述中,一个由来自欧洲和美国的研究人员组成的工作组概述了实验动物模型(包括啮齿动物、鱼类和大型动物)的优缺点,以及体外和计算机技术在骨骼研究中的潜力和局限性。我们建议,将特定假说的正确动物模型与最先进的体外和/或计算机技术相结合,对于解决骨骼研究中剩余的重要问题至关重要。这对于执行 3R 原则以减少、优化和替代动物实验、增强我们对骨骼生物学的认识以及治疗影响社会大部分人群的骨骼疾病至关重要。