Moulopoulos S, Stamatelopoulos S, Petrou P
Eur Heart J. 1986 May;7(5):396-403. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062080.
The efficacy of intraaortic counterpulsation (IABP) in severe cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction is questioned because of the lack of a large controlled series. Out of 52 patients treated for severe, prolonged cardiogenic shock 3 improved with 'conventional' treatment. Forty-nine patients did not improve and were in 'intractable' shock for an average of 10.74 +/- 7.14 h (means +/- SD). Of these, 34 were treated with IABP. Ten survived longer than a month. Of the remaining 15 patients of similar age, severity and duration of shock, in whom the balloon could not be made to operate, none survived. It is suggested that intraaortic counterpulsation can save a number of patients with severe protracted cardiogenic shock after all other available treatment modalities have failed.
由于缺乏大量对照研究系列,主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)对急性心肌梗死后严重心源性休克的疗效受到质疑。在52例因严重、持续性心源性休克接受治疗的患者中,3例经“传统”治疗后病情改善。49例患者病情未改善,处于“顽固性”休克状态,平均时长为10.74 +/- 7.14小时(均值 +/- 标准差)。其中34例接受了IABP治疗。10例存活超过1个月。在其余15例年龄、休克严重程度和时长相似但球囊无法工作的患者中,无一人存活。这表明在所有其他可用治疗方式均失败后,主动脉内球囊反搏可以挽救一些患有严重持续性心源性休克的患者。