Fonseca Tiago A H, Von Rekowski Cristiana P, Araújo Rúben, Oliveira M Conceição, Justino Gonçalo C, Bento Luís, Calado Cecília R C
Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Rua Conselheiro Emídio Navarro 1, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal.
Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
ACS Omega. 2023 Jun 1;8(23):20755-20766. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c01370. eCollection 2023 Jun 13.
Biofluid metabolomics is a very appealing tool to increase the knowledge associated with pathophysiological mechanisms leading to better and new therapies and biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. However, due to the complex process of metabolome analysis, including the metabolome isolation method and the platform used to analyze it, there are diverse factors that affect metabolomics output. In the present work, the impact of two protocols to extract the serum metabolome, one using methanol and another using a mixture of methanol, acetonitrile, and water, was evaluated. The metabolome was analyzed by ultraperformance liquid chromatography associated with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), based on reverse-phase and hydrophobic chromatographic separations, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The two extraction protocols of the metabolome were compared over the analytical platforms (UPLC-MS/MS and FTIR spectroscopy) concerning the number of features, the type of features, common features, and the reproducibility of extraction replicas and analytical replicas. The ability of the extraction protocols to predict the survivability of critically ill patients hospitalized at an intensive care unit was also evaluated. The FTIR spectroscopy platform was compared to the UPLC-MS/MS platform and, despite not identifying metabolites and consequently not contributing as much as UPLC-MS/MS in terms of information concerning metabolic information, it enabled the comparison of the two extraction protocols as well as the development of very good predictive models of patient's survivability, such as the UPLC-MS/MS platform. Furthermore, FTIR spectroscopy is based on much simpler procedures and is rapid, economic, and applicable in the high-throughput mode, i.e., enabling the simultaneous analysis of hundreds of samples in the microliter range in a couple of hours. Therefore, FTIR spectroscopy represents a very interesting complementary technique not only to optimize processes as the metabolome isolation but also for obtaining biomarkers such as those for disease prognosis.
生物流体代谢组学是一种非常有吸引力的工具,可用于增加与病理生理机制相关的知识,从而带来更好的新疗法以及用于疾病诊断和预后的生物标志物。然而,由于代谢组分析过程复杂,包括代谢组分离方法和用于分析的平台,存在多种影响代谢组学输出的因素。在本研究中,评估了两种提取血清代谢组的方法的影响,一种使用甲醇,另一种使用甲醇、乙腈和水的混合物。基于反相和疏水色谱分离,通过与串联质谱联用的超高效液相色谱(UPLC-MS/MS)以及傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱对代谢组进行分析。在分析平台(UPLC-MS/MS和FTIR光谱)上,比较了代谢组的两种提取方法在特征数量、特征类型、共同特征以及提取复制品和分析复制品的重现性方面的差异。还评估了提取方法预测重症监护病房住院重症患者生存能力的能力。将FTIR光谱平台与UPLC-MS/MS平台进行了比较,尽管FTIR光谱平台无法识别代谢物,因此在代谢信息方面提供的信息不如UPLC-MS/MS多,但它能够比较两种提取方法,并开发出与UPLC-MS/MS平台一样出色的患者生存能力预测模型。此外,FTIR光谱基于更简单的程序,快速、经济且适用于高通量模式,即在几小时内能够同时分析数百个微升范围内的样品。因此,FTIR光谱不仅是一种非常有趣的补充技术,可用于优化代谢组分离等过程,还可用于获取疾病预后等生物标志物。