Brzoska Josef, von Eick Harald, Hündgen Manfred
Retired, Laupheim, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 30;10:1198576. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1198576. eCollection 2023.
Interferons were repeatedly used in the therapy of COVID-19 due to their antiviral effects. Three recently published randomized controlled clinical phase III trials (WHO SOLIDARITY, ACTT-3, and SPRINTER) missed their primary objectives, i.e., a significant therapeutic effect of interferons was not demonstrated in these studies. In only one randomized controlled phase III trial (TOGETHER), a significant reduction in the hospitalization rate was revealed. Our study analyzes these findings, gives possible explanations for the failure of interferons, provides a proposal on how these agents could be successfully used, and also highlights the limitations of their employment in COVID-19. Interferons are apparently beneficial only if the patients are in the early stage of this disease and when they are usually not hospitalized, i.e., if the patients do not require oxygen support and/or if corticosteroids are not yet indicated. Furthermore, a higher dosage than the one used in the long-term treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta or of chronic viral hepatitis with interferon alpha or lambda should be employed to achieve a better therapeutic effect in COVID-19.
由于干扰素具有抗病毒作用,因此被反复用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)。最近发表的三项随机对照三期临床试验(世界卫生组织团结试验、ACTT-3和短跑者试验)均未达到其主要目标,即在这些研究中未证明干扰素具有显著的治疗效果。仅在一项随机对照三期试验(联合试验)中,住院率有显著降低。我们的研究分析了这些结果,对干扰素治疗失败给出了可能的解释,就如何成功使用这些药物提出了建议,并强调了其在COVID-19治疗中的局限性。干扰素显然只有在患者处于该疾病的早期阶段且通常不住院时才有益,即如果患者不需要氧气支持和/或尚未使用皮质类固醇。此外,为了在COVID-19中取得更好的治疗效果,应采用比用于干扰素β长期治疗多发性硬化症或干扰素α或λ长期治疗慢性病毒性肝炎更高的剂量。