Suppr超能文献

参与者对参与适应性脑深部刺激试验后心理社会领域变化的看法。

Participant perceptions of changes in psychosocial domains following participation in an adaptive deep brain stimulation trial.

机构信息

Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2023 Jul-Aug;16(4):990-998. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been substantial controversy in the neuroethics literature regarding the extent to which deep brain stimulation (DBS) impacts dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Despite extensive debate in the theoretical literature, there remains a paucity of empirical data available to support or refute claims related to the psychosocial changes following DBS.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to examine the perspectives of patients who underwent DBS regarding changes to their personality, authenticity, autonomy, risk-taking, and overall quality of life.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 21) who were enrolled in adaptive DBS trials for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette's syndrome, or dystonia participated. Qualitative data revealed that participants, in general, reported positive experiences with alterations in what was described as 'personality, mood, and behavior changes.' The majority of participants reported increases in quality of life. No participants reported 'regretting the decision to undergo DBS.'

CONCLUSION(S): The findings from this patient sample do not support the narrative that DBS results in substantial adverse changes to dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior. Changes reported as "negative" or "undesired" were few in number, and transient in nature.

摘要

背景

在神经伦理学文献中,关于深度脑刺激(DBS)在多大程度上影响人格、情绪和行为等方面存在着很大的争议。

目的/假设:尽管在理论文献中进行了广泛的辩论,但仍然缺乏支持或反驳与 DBS 后心理社会变化相关的声称的经验数据。

方法

采用混合方法研究,探讨接受 DBS 的患者对其人格、真实性、自主性、冒险行为和整体生活质量变化的看法。

结果

纳入了帕金森病、特发性震颤、强迫症、妥瑞氏综合征或肌张力障碍的适应性 DBS 试验的患者(n=21)参与了研究。定性数据分析显示,大多数参与者表示对所谓的“人格、情绪和行为变化”的改变有积极的体验。大多数参与者报告生活质量提高。没有参与者报告“后悔接受 DBS 治疗”。

结论

本患者样本的研究结果不支持 DBS 会导致人格、情绪和行为等方面出现实质性的不良变化的说法。报告的“负面”或“不理想”的变化数量较少,且是暂时的。

相似文献

2
Deep brain stimulation and the role of the neuropsychologist.深部脑刺激与神经心理学家的作用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;21(1):162-89. doi: 10.1080/13825580601025940.
3
Reoperation for suboptimal outcomes after deep brain stimulation surgery.针对脑深部电刺激手术效果欠佳进行的再次手术。
Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4):754-60; discussion 760-1. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325492.58799.35.
5
Deep brain stimulation: current status.深部脑刺激:现状
Neurol India. 2015 Jan-Feb;63(1):9-18. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.152623.
7
Deep brain stimulation: foundations and future trends.深部脑刺激:基础与未来趋势。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018 Jan 1;23(1):162-182. doi: 10.2741/4586.
10
The treatment of movement disorders by deep brain stimulation.通过深部脑刺激治疗运动障碍。
Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.10.072.

引用本文的文献

6
The Potential Harms of Speculative Neuroethics Research.投机性神经伦理学研究的潜在危害。
AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):418-421. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257170. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

2

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验