Luo Xiuping, Wang Jie, Wu Qing, Peng Peng, Liao Guolin, Liang Chenghai, Yang Huiying, Huang Jiean, Qin Mengbin
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 2;10:1145471. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1145471. eCollection 2023.
Although there are several scoring systems currently used to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis, each of them has limitations. Determine the accuracy of a modified Ranson score in predicting disease severity and prognosis in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).
AP patients admitted or transferred to our institution were allocated to a modeling group ( 304) or a validation group ( 192). A modified Ranson score was determined by excluding the fluid sequestration parameter and including the modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI). The diagnostic performance of the modified Ranson score was compared with the Ranson score, modified CTSI, and bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score in predicting disease severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection.
The modified Ranson score had significantly better accuracy that the Ranson score in predicting all four outcome measures in the modeling group and in the validation group (all < 0.05). For the modeling group the modified Ranson score had the best accuracy for predicting disease severity and organ failure, and second-best accuracy for predicting pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection. For the verification group, it had the best accuracy for predicting organ failure, second-best accuracy for predicting disease severity and pancreatic necrosis, and third-best accuracy for predicting pancreatic infection.
The modified Ranson score provided better accuracy than the Ranson score in predicting disease severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection. Relative to the other scoring systems, the modified Ranson system was superior in predicting organ failure.
尽管目前有几种评分系统用于预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度,但每种系统都有其局限性。确定改良兰森评分在预测急性胰腺炎(AP)患者疾病严重程度和预后方面的准确性。
将入住或转入我院的AP患者分为建模组(304例)和验证组(192例)。通过排除液体潴留参数并纳入改良计算机断层扫描严重指数(CTSI)来确定改良兰森评分。将改良兰森评分在预测疾病严重程度、器官衰竭、胰腺坏死和胰腺感染方面的诊断性能与兰森评分、改良CTSI和急性胰腺炎床边严重指数(BISAP)评分进行比较。
在建模组和验证组中,改良兰森评分在预测所有四项结局指标方面的准确性均显著优于兰森评分(均P<0.05)。对于建模组,改良兰森评分在预测疾病严重程度和器官衰竭方面准确性最佳,在预测胰腺坏死和胰腺感染方面准确性次之。对于验证组,其在预测器官衰竭方面准确性最佳,在预测疾病严重程度和胰腺坏死方面准确性次之,在预测胰腺感染方面准确性排第三。
改良兰森评分在预测疾病严重程度、器官衰竭、胰腺坏死和胰腺感染方面比兰森评分具有更高的准确性。相对于其他评分系统,改良兰森系统在预测器官衰竭方面更具优势。