Lu Yang, Guo Caiyun
Department of Endocrinology, YuYao People's Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Department of Endocrinology, YuYao People's Hospital, 800 Chengdong Road, Yuyao, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315400, China.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Jun 10;14:20420986231178126. doi: 10.1177/20420986231178126. eCollection 2023.
The objective of this review was to assess the risk of lower limb amputation (LLA) in type 2 diabetic patients based on the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1a).
PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were referenced for articles published up to 5 February 2023. All types of studies comparing the drugs for LLA risk and reporting hazard ratios (HR) were included.
Thirteen studies with 2,095,033 patients were included. Meta-analysis of eight studies comparing SGLT2i with Dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors (DPPi) showed that there was no difference in the risk of LLA between the two drug groups (HR: 0.98 95% CI: 0.73, 1.31 = 89%). The outcomes were unchanged on sensitivity analysis. Another pooled analysis of six studies found no significant difference in the risk of LLA between SGLT2i and GLP1a users (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.60; = 69%). The exclusion of a single study showed an increased risk of LLA with SGLT2i (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.60; = 14%).
The current updated meta-analysis found no significant difference in the risk of LLA between SGLT2i and DPP4i users. A tendency of increased risk of LLA was noted with SGLT2i as compared to GLP1a. Further studies shall increase the robustness of current findings.
本综述的目的是基于使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)或胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1a)来评估2型糖尿病患者下肢截肢(LLA)的风险。
检索了截至2023年2月5日发表的文章的PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase数据库。纳入了所有比较这些药物LLA风险并报告风险比(HR)的各类研究。
纳入了13项研究,共2,095,033名患者。对8项比较SGLT2i与二肽基肽酶抑制剂(DPPi)的研究进行的荟萃分析表明,两组药物之间LLA风险无差异(HR:0.98;95%置信区间:0.73, 1.31;异质性检验P值 = 89%)。敏感性分析结果未变。另一项对6项研究的汇总分析发现,SGLT2i使用者和GLP1a使用者之间LLA风险无显著差异(HR:1.26;95%置信区间:0.99, 1.60;异质性检验P值 = 69%)。排除一项研究后显示,使用SGLT2i会增加LLA风险(HR:1.35;95%置信区间:1.14, 1.60;异质性检验P值 = 14%)。
当前的更新荟萃分析发现,SGLT2i使用者和DPP4i使用者之间LLA风险无显著差异。与GLP1a相比,使用SGLT2i有增加LLA风险的趋势。进一步的研究应增强当前研究结果的稳健性。