Mazda Yusuke, Ando Kazuo, Kato Azusa, Noguchi Shohei, Sugiyama Takayasu, Hizuka Kotaro, Nagai Azusa, Ikeda Yusuke, Sakamaki Daisuke, Guo Nan, Carvalho Brendan, Sultan Pervez
Department of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan (Drs Mazda, Kato, Noguchi, Sugiyama, Hizuka, Nagai, Ikeda, and Sakamaki).
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Drs Ando, Guo, Carvalho, and Sultan).
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 May 20;3(3):100226. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100226. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Inpatient postpartum recovery trajectories following cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery are underexplored.
This study primarily aimed to compare recovery following cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery in the first postpartum week, and secondarily to evaluate psychometrically the Japanese version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scoring tool.
Following institutional review board approval, the EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level) questionnaire and a Japanese version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 measure were used to evaluate inpatient postpartum recovery in uncomplicated nulliparous parturients delivering via scheduled cesarean delivery or spontaneous vaginal delivery.
A total of 48 and 50 women who delivered via cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery, respectively, were recruited. Women delivering via scheduled cesarean delivery experienced significantly worse quality of recovery on days 1 and 2 compared with those who had spontaneous vaginal delivery. Quality of recovery significantly improved daily, plateauing at days 4 and 3 for cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery groups, respectively. Compared with cesarean delivery, spontaneous vaginal delivery was associated with prolonged time to analgesia requirement, decreased opioid consumption, reduced antiemetic requirement, and reduced times to liquid/solid intake, ambulation, and discharge. Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10-Japanese is a valid (correlates with the EQ-5D-3L including a global health visual analog scale, gestational age, blood loss, opioid consumption, time until first analgesic request, liquid/solid intake, ambulation, catheter removal, and discharge), reliable (Cronbach alpha=0.88; Spearman-Brown reliability estimate=0.94; and intraclass correlation coefficient=0.89), and clinically feasible (98% 24-hour response rate) measure.
Inpatient postpartum recovery is significantly better in the first 2 postpartum days following spontaneous vaginal delivery compared with scheduled cesarean delivery. Inpatient recovery is largely achieved within 4 and 3 days following scheduled cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery, respectively. Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10-Japanese is a valid, reliable, and feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery.
剖宫产和自然阴道分娩后住院期间的产后恢复轨迹尚未得到充分研究。
本研究主要旨在比较产后第一周剖宫产和自然阴道分娩后的恢复情况,其次是对日语版的产后恢复质量-10评分工具进行心理测量学评估。
经机构审查委员会批准后,使用EQ-5D-3L(欧洲五维度健康量表3水平)问卷和日语版的产后恢复质量-10测量工具,对通过择期剖宫产或自然阴道分娩的无并发症初产妇的住院产后恢复情况进行评估。
分别招募了48名和50名通过剖宫产和自然阴道分娩的女性。与自然阴道分娩的女性相比,择期剖宫产的女性在第1天和第2天的恢复质量明显较差。恢复质量每天都有显著改善,剖宫产组和自然阴道分娩组分别在第4天和第3天趋于平稳。与剖宫产相比,自然阴道分娩与镇痛需求时间延长、阿片类药物消耗量减少、止吐药需求减少以及液体/固体摄入、行走和出院时间缩短有关。产后恢复质量-10日语版是一种有效的(与EQ-5D-3L相关,包括总体健康视觉模拟量表、孕周、失血量、阿片类药物消耗量、首次镇痛请求时间、液体/固体摄入、行走、导尿管拔除和出院)、可靠的(克朗巴哈α系数=0.88;斯皮尔曼-布朗信度估计=0.94;组内相关系数=0.89)且临床可行的(24小时应答率为98%)测量工具。
与择期剖宫产相比,自然阴道分娩后产后住院恢复在产后头2天明显更好。择期剖宫产和自然阴道分娩后,住院恢复分别在4天和3天内基本完成。产后恢复质量-10日语版是一种有效、可靠且可行的住院产后恢复测量工具。