• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其语版产后恢复质量量表-10的编制与验证

Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10.

作者信息

Kozanhan Betül, Yıldız Munise, Polat Ayşenur, Günenç Oğuzhan, Tutar Sami Mahmut, İyisoy Mehmet Sinan, Kulhan Nur Gözde, Sultan Pervez

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.

Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Oct;50(5):366-372. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441.

DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441
PMID:36301286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9682945/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility.

METHODS

Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires.

RESULTS

One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r=-0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.87 and inter-item correlation=0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate=0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes.

摘要

目的

10项产科恢复质量量表(Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale)是一种经过验证的患者报告结局问卷,用于测量分娩后的恢复质量。本研究旨在开发10项产科恢复质量量表的土耳其语版本,以评估其有效性、可靠性和临床可行性。

方法

对接受阴道分娩或择期剖宫产的足月产妇,要求她们在分娩后24小时完成10项产科恢复质量量表土耳其语版评分工具及欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores,包括总体健康视觉模拟量表)。为验证10项产科恢复质量量表土耳其语版,我们评估了其有效性、可靠性和临床可行性,并将其与EQ-5D-3L问卷进行比较。

结果

100名产妇在24小时内完成了问卷(应答率100%)。10项产科恢复质量量表土耳其语版在24小时时与EQ-5D-3L评分(r=-0.611)和总体健康视觉模拟量表评分(r = 0.652)高度相关,且在恢复良好与恢复不佳之间有良好区分度(总体健康视觉模拟量表评分≥70分与<70分;中位数四分位间距分别为86 [80-90]和68 [59-75],P <.001)。剖宫产和阴道分娩的评分相似,分别为83(76-89)和82.5(69-90)(P =.5)。10项产科恢复质量量表土耳其语版24小时评分与任何基线人口统计学和临床数据参数均无相关性。内部一致性良好(克朗巴哈系数=0.87,项目间相关性=0.41),分半信度非常好(斯皮尔曼-布朗预测信度估计值=0.86)。重测信度极佳(组内相关系数=0.99)。未显示地板效应或天花板效应。

结论

10项产科恢复质量量表土耳其语版是一种有效、可靠且临床可行的测量剖宫产和阴道分娩模式下住院产后恢复情况的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1363/9682945/4d1350c4860d/tjar-50-5-366_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1363/9682945/4d1350c4860d/tjar-50-5-366_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1363/9682945/4d1350c4860d/tjar-50-5-366_f001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10.土耳其语版产后恢复质量量表-10的编制与验证
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Oct;50(5):366-372. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441.
2
Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish).西班牙语版产科恢复质量10项评分(ObsQoR-10-西班牙语版)的开发与验证。
BJA Open. 2024 Mar 21;10:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese).产科康复质量量表 10 项(ObsQoR-10-Portuguese)的葡萄牙语版本的制定与验证。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Jun;41(3):101085. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101085. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study.使用产后恢复质量-10量表(ObsQoR-10)对自然阴道分娩与手术阴道分娩的比较:一项观察性队列研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study.在发展中国家,对择期剖宫产术后产科康复质量评分工具(ObsQoR-11)进行验证:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb;49:103235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103235. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study.采用产科康复质量-10 患者报告结局测量评估住院产后恢复:一项单中心观察性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100202. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后产科康复质量评分 11 土耳其语版(ObsQoR-11T)的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Nov 28;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02073-y.
8
Postpartum recovery of nulliparous women following scheduled cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery: a prospective observational study.未产妇择期剖宫产与自然阴道分娩后的产后恢复:一项前瞻性观察研究。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 May 20;3(3):100226. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100226. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery.非择期剖宫产术后产科康复质量评分(ObsQoR-11)评估。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Validation of the Turkish version of Endometriosis Health Profile questionnaire (EHP-30) to evaluate the quality of life in women with endometriosis.验证用于评估子宫内膜异位症女性生活质量的土耳其语版子宫内膜异位症健康状况问卷(EHP-30)。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Jun;15(2):131-136. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.2.079.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the Stanford Obstetric Recovery Checklist (STORK): A Delphi Consensus and Multicenter Clinical Validation Study.斯坦福产科恢复检查表(STORK)的开发与验证:一项德尔菲共识及多中心临床验证研究
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255713. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5713.
2
Evaluating the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) after elective Caesarean section in a South African public hospital: a prospective before-after study.评估强化康复计划对南非一家公立医院择期剖宫产术后产科恢复质量评分(ObsQoR-10)的影响:一项前瞻性前后对照研究。
BJA Open. 2025 Jan 17;13:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100373. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Proposed domains for assessing postpartum recovery: a concept elicitation study.用于评估产后恢复的拟议领域:概念启发研究。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):9-20. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16937. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery on maternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术后加速康复对产妇结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Oct;40(5):100935. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100935. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates.
The implementation of intrathecal morphine for caesarean delivery into clinical practice, and assessment of its impact on patient-reported quality of recovery using the ObsQoR-10-Dutch scale: A single-centre cohort study.
鞘内注射吗啡用于剖宫产术的临床实践及使用ObsQoR-10荷兰语量表评估其对患者报告的恢复质量的影响:一项单中心队列研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Apr 1;42(4):332-339. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002127. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Association of inpatient postpartum recovery with patient-reported outcome measures following hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study.产后住院康复与出院后患者报告结局指标的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06805-4.
5
Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish).西班牙语版产科恢复质量10项评分(ObsQoR-10-西班牙语版)的开发与验证。
BJA Open. 2024 Mar 21;10:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Validation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产术后产科康复质量评分(obsqor-10-Thai)泰语版的验证。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02010-6.
剖宫产率的趋势和预测:全球和区域估计。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
4
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.使用患者报告结局测量评估门诊产后康复:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600.
5
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess postpartum pain using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.采用共识导向的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南对评估产后疼痛的患者报告结局测量进行系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;127(2):264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.03.035. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess sleep in postpartum women using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.采用共识导向的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南对用于评估产后女性睡眠的患者报告结局测量进行系统评价。
Sleep. 2021 Oct 11;44(10). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab128.
7
Postpartum recovery: what does it take to get back to a baseline?产后恢复:需要什么才能恢复到基线?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):86-93. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000684.
8
Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study.采用产科康复质量-10 患者报告结局测量评估住院产后恢复:一项单中心观察性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100202. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean.美国产科麻醉学会与围产学会:剖宫产术后加速康复的共识声明与建议
Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1362-1377. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005257.
10
Obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool: assessment of validity, reliability and feasibility in an Israeli cesarean delivery population.产科恢复质量评分工具:以色列剖宫产人群中的效度、信度和可行性评估
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Nov;44:51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 25.