• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微螺纹牙种植体的累积生存率:一项长期回顾性研究。

The cumulative survival rate of dental implants with micro-threads: a long-term retrospective study.

作者信息

Nam Dong-Hui, Kim Pil-Jong, Koo Ki-Tae, Seol Yang-Jo, Lee Yong-Moo, Ku Young, Rhyu In-Chul, Kim Sungtae, Cho Young-Dan

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Biomedical Knowledge Engineering Laboratory, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):53-62. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203240162. Epub 2023 May 30.

DOI:10.5051/jpis.2203240162
PMID:37336523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10901680/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cumulative survival rate (CSR) of dental implants with micro-threads in the neck over a 10-year follow-up period and to examine the factors influencing the survival rate of dental implants.

METHODS

This retrospective study was based on radiographic and dental records. In total, 151 patients received 490 Oneplant dental implants with an implant neck micro-thread design during 2006-2010 in the Department of Periodontology of Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Implant survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify the factors influencing implant failure.

RESULTS

Ten out of 490 implants (2.04%) failed due to fixture fracture. The CSR of the implants was 97.9%, and no significant difference was observed in the CSR between external- and internal-implant types (98.2% and 97.6%, respectively, =0.670). In Cox regression analysis, 2-stage surgery significantly increased the risk of implant failure (hazard ratio: 4.769, =0.039). There were no significant differences in influencing factors, including sex, age, implant diameter, length, fixture type, location, surgical procedure, bone grafting, and restoration type.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the micro-thread design of the implant neck was found to be favorable for implant survival, with stable clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估颈部带有微螺纹的牙种植体在10年随访期内的长期累积生存率(CSR),并探讨影响牙种植体生存率的因素。

方法

本回顾性研究基于影像学和牙科记录。2006年至2010年期间,共有151例患者在首尔国立大学牙医院牙周病科接受了490颗采用种植体颈部微螺纹设计的Oneplant牙种植体。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估种植体的生存率。使用Cox比例风险回归分析来确定影响种植体失败的因素。

结果

490颗种植体中有10颗(2.04%)因种植体折断而失败。种植体的CSR为97.9%,外部种植体和内部种植体类型之间的CSR没有显著差异(分别为98.2%和97.6%,P = 0.670)。在Cox回归分析中,二期手术显著增加了种植体失败的风险(风险比:4.769,P = 0.039)。在影响因素方面,包括性别、年龄、种植体直径、长度、种植体类型、位置、手术程序、骨移植和修复类型,均无显著差异。

结论

在本回顾性研究的局限性内,发现种植体颈部的微螺纹设计有利于种植体存活,临床结果稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/b34e61c2c20b/jpis-54-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/42c871469574/jpis-54-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/0d3a9b72db25/jpis-54-53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/b34e61c2c20b/jpis-54-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/42c871469574/jpis-54-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/0d3a9b72db25/jpis-54-53-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d86d/10901680/b34e61c2c20b/jpis-54-53-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The cumulative survival rate of dental implants with micro-threads: a long-term retrospective study.微螺纹牙种植体的累积生存率:一项长期回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):53-62. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203240162. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Retrospective radiographic observational study of 1692 Straumann tissue-level dental implants over 10 years: I. Implant survival and loss pattern.10 年回顾性放射影像学观察研究:1692 例士卓曼软组织水平种植体:I. 种植体存活率和失败模式。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):860-866. doi: 10.1111/cid.12659. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
3
The cumulative survival rate of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched dental implants: a retrospective analysis.喷砂、大颗粒、酸蚀牙种植体的累积生存率:一项回顾性分析。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Apr;54(2):122-135. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2301440072. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Clinical evaluation of 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study with up to 5 years of observation.3.0毫米窄直径种植体的临床评估:一项长达5年观察期的回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):44-52. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300820041. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
A retrospective study of the long-term survival of RESTORE dental implants with resorbable blast media surface.一项关于采用可吸收喷砂介质表面的RESTORE牙科种植体长期存活率的回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023 Dec;53(6):444-452. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203340167. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Cumulative survival rate and associated risk factors of Implantium implants: A 10-year retrospective clinical study.Implantium种植体的累积生存率及相关危险因素:一项10年回顾性临床研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):195-199. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.195. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals.分析种植体失败的风险因素,尤其是上颌磨牙区:对 6977 例中国人群种植体的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):138-144. doi: 10.1111/cid.12697. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.下颌骨种植体存活率的长期回顾性分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1348-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3910.
9
Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.对私人诊所环境中4591颗士卓曼种植体进行回顾性队列研究,随访时间长达10年。第1部分:多变量生存分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1345-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.12463. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
10
Implant fracture failure rate and potential associated risk indicators: An up to 12-year retrospective study of implants in 5,124 patients.种植体骨折失败率及其潜在相关风险指标:5124 例患者长达 12 年的回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Mar;30(3):206-217. doi: 10.1111/clr.13407. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact on the Progression, Morphology, and Cellular Integrity of Biofilm Formation on the Surfaces of Implants; Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.对植入物表面生物膜形成的进展、形态及细胞完整性的影响;当前认知与未来展望
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(2):620-636. doi: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.14.2.620. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a bone-level, 2-piece, internal connection implant system with coronal microthreads over 10 years of follow-up: a retrospective clinical study.一种具有冠部微螺纹的骨水平、两件式、内连接种植体系统10年随访的长期临床和影像学结果:一项回顾性临床研究
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025 Apr;55(2):153-166. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2401100055. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patent landscape report on dental implants: A technical analysis.牙科植入物专利分析报告:技术分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Dec;23(6):857-863. doi: 10.1111/cid.13048. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Implant survival and risk factor analysis in regenerated bone: results from a 5-year retrospective study.再生骨中种植体的存留率及危险因素分析:一项5年回顾性研究的结果
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020 Dec;50(6):379-391. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2002140107.
3
The development and future of dental implants.牙科种植体的发展与未来。
Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.
垂直种植体位置对边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04480-7.
Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):167-172. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Levels of smoking and dental implants failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.吸烟与牙种植体失败的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Apr;47(4):518-528. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13257. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Incidence of abutment screw failure of single or splinted implant prostheses: A review and update on current clinical status.单颗或桥接式种植体修复体基台螺丝失败的发生率:当前临床状况的回顾与更新。
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Aug;46(8):776-786. doi: 10.1111/joor.12817. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Early and late implant failure of submerged versus non-submerged implant healing: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.早期和晚期种植体失败:淹没式和非淹没式种植体愈合的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):613-623. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12890.
7
Five-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing bone-level implants with either submerged or transmucosal healing.一项比较骨水平种植体与黏膜下愈合或穿黏膜愈合的随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jan;45(1):125-135. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12832. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
8
Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants.种植体植入扭矩:其在实现可修复牙种植体初期稳定性中的作用。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Feb;38(2):88-95; quiz 96.
9
Microthreaded Implants and Crestal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.微螺纹种植体与牙槽嵴骨吸收:一项系统评价
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Apr;43(2):157-166. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00170. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
10
A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years.一项对至少随访10年的纵向研究中单个种植体存活率的系统评价。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9 Suppl 1:S155-62.