Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37091-3.
This experimental crossover study was performed to investigate whether fenestrated surgical drapes (covering the nose and mouth but with an opening over the periorbital area) with or without patients' surgical face masks increase periorbital bacterial dispersion during simulated intravitreal injection conditions. Each of the 16 healthy volunteers performed 14 scenarios involving different mask and drape conditions in both silent and speaking situations. In each scenario, the subject lay down flat on the back with a blood agar plate being held at the inferior orbital rim perpendicular to the face to capture airflow from breathing/speaking. Another blood agar plate placed 50 cm away from the subject served as an experimental control. A total of 224 experiments were performed. Speaking situations significantly showed more colony forming units (CFUs) compared with their controls (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences in CFUs between wearing vs not wearing the masks (P = 0.887 for speaking and P = 0.219 for silent) and using vs not using the drapes (P = 0.941 for speaking and P = 0.687 for silent). Reusable and disposable drapes were also not significantly different (P = 1.00 for speaking and P = 0.625 for silent). Streptococcus spp., the oropharyngeal microbiota, were only cultivated from speaking scenarios. While refraining from speaking (for both practitioners and patients) is the mainstay of reducing bacterial dispersion and risks of post-injection endophthalmitis, the use of fenestrated surgical drapes or patients' face masks did not significantly affect the amount of bacterial dispersion toward the periorbital area.
这项实验性交叉研究旨在探究在模拟玻璃体腔内注射条件下,覆盖口鼻但眶周区域有开口的有孔手术铺巾(以下简称有孔铺巾)和/或患者手术口罩是否会增加眶周细菌的扩散。16 名健康志愿者每人完成 14 种不同的口罩和铺巾条件下的模拟情景,包括安静和说话两种情况。在每种情景下,受测者仰卧,将血琼脂平板置于下眼眶边缘垂直于面部,以捕获呼吸/说话产生的气流。另一个血琼脂平板放置在离受测者 50 厘米远处作为实验对照。共进行了 224 次实验。说话情景下的细菌集落形成单位(CFU)明显多于对照情景(P=0.014)。佩戴和不佩戴口罩(说话时 P=0.887,安静时 P=0.219)、使用和不使用铺巾(说话时 P=0.941,安静时 P=0.687)以及使用可重复使用和一次性铺巾(说话时 P=1.00,安静时 P=0.625)之间 CFU 无显著差异。说话时,培养出的细菌主要为口咽微生物群中的链球菌属。虽然避免说话(对医生和患者而言)是减少细菌扩散和注射后眼内炎风险的主要方法,但使用有孔手术铺巾或患者手术口罩不会显著影响细菌向眶周区域的扩散量。