College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, QLD, 4811, Townsville, Australia.
College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 19;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x.
The translation of research into healthcare practice relies on effective communication between disciplines, however strategies to address the gap between information sharing and knowledge transfer are still under exploration. Communities of Practice (CoP) are informal networks of stakeholders with shared knowledge or endeavour and present an opportunity to address this gap beyond disciplinary boundaries. However, the evidence-base supporting their development, implementation and efficacy in health is not well described. This review explores the evidence underpinning the use of CoP in health research and translation.
A scoping review was undertaken using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. A comprehensive search of health databases and grey literature was performed using keywords and controlled vocabulary. Studies were not restricted by date or research method.
A total of 1355 potentially relevant articles were identified through the global search strategy. Following screening, six articles were retained for analysis. Included studies were published between 2002 and 2013 in the United Kingdom (n = 3), Canada (n = 2) and Italy (n = 1). Three papers reported primary research; one used a quantitative methodology, one a qualitative, and one a descriptive evaluation approach. The three remaining papers explored seminal and evolving theories of CoP in the context of knowledge transfer and translation to the health sector.
A paucity of evidence exists regarding the development and efficacy of CoP in health research and translation. Further empirical research is required to determine if communities of practice can enhance the translation of research into clinical practice.
研究向医疗实践的转化依赖于不同学科之间的有效沟通,然而,解决信息共享与知识转移之间差距的策略仍在探索之中。实践社区(CoP)是具有共享知识或努力的利益相关者的非正式网络,为跨越学科界限解决这一差距提供了机会。然而,支持 CoP 在卫生领域的发展、实施和有效性的证据基础描述得并不充分。本综述探讨了 CoP 在卫生研究和转化中的应用所依据的证据。
采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法学框架进行了范围综述。使用关键词和受控词汇对健康数据库和灰色文献进行了全面搜索。研究不受日期或研究方法的限制。
通过全球搜索策略共确定了 1355 篇潜在相关文章。经过筛选,保留了 6 篇文章进行分析。纳入的研究发表于 2002 年至 2013 年间,分别来自英国(n=3)、加拿大(n=2)和意大利(n=1)。有 3 篇论文报告了初步研究;1 篇采用定量方法,1 篇采用定性方法,1 篇采用描述性评估方法。其余 3 篇论文探讨了 CoP 的主要理论和不断发展的理论,以及它们在知识转移和向卫生部门转化方面的应用。
关于 CoP 在卫生研究和转化中的发展和效果的证据很少。需要进一步的实证研究来确定实践社区是否可以增强研究向临床实践的转化。