Translational Justice in Human Gene Editing: Bringing End User Engagement and Policy Together.
作者信息
Allyse Megan A, Meagher Karen M, Michie Marsha, Isasi Rosario, Ormond Kelly E, Bonhomme Natasha, Bombard Yvonne, Howard Heidi, Musunuru Kiran, Riggan Kirsten A, Rubeck Sabina
机构信息
Mayo Clinic.
Case Western Reserve University.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):55-58. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207513.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Translational Justice in Human Gene Editing: Bringing End User Engagement and Policy Together.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):55-58. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207513.
2
Reproductive Embryo Editing: Attending to Justice.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):26-33. doi: 10.1002/hast.1406.
3
Learning from the Past: Discussing Lessons from Reproductive Justice in the Gene-Editing Sphere.
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2021 Sep;25(9):571-572. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2021.0217.
4
Unbounding ELSI: The Ongoing Work of Centering Equity and Justice.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):103-105. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2214055.
5
Improving the justice-based argument for conducting human gene editing research to cure sickle cell disease.
Bioethics. 2020 Feb;34(2):200-202. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12690. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Why were scientists silent over gene-edited babies?
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7745):427. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00662-4.
7
Justice in CRISPR/Cas9 Research and Clinical Applications.
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):E826-833. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.826.
8
Social justice in pandemic immunization policy: We're all in this together.
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Sep;28(6):924-934. doi: 10.1177/0969733020983395. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
US cities increasingly integrate justice into climate planning and create policy tools for climate justice.
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 30;13(1):5763. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33392-9.
10
Genetics and Justice, Non-Ideal Theory and the Role of Patents: The Case of CRISPR-Cas9.
Eur J Health Law. 2022 Apr 8;29(3-5):543-561. doi: 10.1163/15718093-bja10075.
引用本文的文献
1
Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare.
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jun;25(6):11-25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2457713. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
2
Grounded in Reality: Integrating Community Values and Priorities of End Users in Human Gene Editing.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Aug;24(8):43-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2361880. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Genetic therapies for cardiomyopathy: survey of attitudes of the patient community for the CureHeart project.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep;32(9):1045-1052. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01660-5. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
4
The attitude and behaviors of the different spheres of the community of the United Arab Emirates toward the clinical utility and bioethics of secondary genetic findings: a cross-sectional study.
Hum Genomics. 2023 Nov 6;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00548-7.
本文引用的文献
1
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):9-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207502. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Regulating genome editing technologies: a comparison of expert recommendations in the U.K. and in the U.S.A.
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019 Nov 27;3(6):701-705. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180101.
3
What do we do now?: Responding to claims of germline gene editing in humans.
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2181-2183. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0492-3. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Gene modification therapies: views of parents of people with Down syndrome.
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):487-492. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0077-6. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Do guidelines create uniformity in medical practice?
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
6
Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st-century genetics.
Fam Process. 2005 Mar;44(1):3-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00039.x.
Zotero 插件