Rethinking the "Public" and Rethinking "Engagement".
作者信息
Fox Brandy, Martschenko Daphne Oluwaseun
机构信息
Stanford Medicine.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):66-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207517.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rethinking the "Public" and Rethinking "Engagement".重新思考“公众”与重新思考“参与”。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):66-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207517.
2
Public Deliberation about Gene Editing in the Wild.公众对野外基因编辑的讨论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S2-S10. doi: 10.1002/hast.1314.
3
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.公众参与人类基因组编辑研究治理的前景与现实。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):9-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207502. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Rethink public engagement for gene editing.重新思考基因编辑的公众参与。
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):438-439. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03269-3.
5
What Difference Can Public Engagement in Genome Editing Make, and for Whom?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):58-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207545.
6
Geneva Statement on Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Need for Course Correction.日内瓦人类基因组编辑可遗传宣言：需要进行路线修正。
Trends Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;38(4):351-354. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
Genome editing: science, ethics, and public engagement.基因组编辑：科学、伦理与公众参与。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 12;390(10095):625. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32209-2.
8
Knowing when to talk? Plant genome editing as a site for pre-engagement institutional reflexivity.何时该开口？植物基因组编辑作为预先参与机构反思的场所。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug;30(6):740-758. doi: 10.1177/0963662521999796. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
9
A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol.南非人群中可遗传基因组编辑的虚拟决策公众参与研究：研究方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256097. eCollection 2021.
10
Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?为何要让公众参与基因编辑治理的审议？
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Dec 1;21(12):E1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1065.
引用本文的文献
1
The methodological and ethical concerns of genetic studies of same-sex sexual behavior.同性性行为的遗传研究的方法学和伦理问题。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2107-2116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Wrestling with Public Input on an Ethical Analysis of Scientific Research.科学研究伦理分析中对公众意见的权衡。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Mar;53 Suppl 1:S50-S65. doi: 10.1002/hast.1478.
2
Re-envisioning community genetics: community empowerment in preventive genomics.重新构想社区遗传学：预防性基因组学中的社区赋权
J Community Genet. 2023 Oct;14(5):459-469. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00638-y. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
3
Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.权力共享、能力建设与ELSI中不断演变的角色：本土基因组研究伦理中心
Collaborations (Coral Gables). 2020;3(1). doi: 10.33596/coll.71. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.患者为中心的结果研究所参与度评分标准：研究合作的成功实践
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.
5
Implementing a public deliberative forum.实施一个公共审议论坛。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Mar-Apr;42(2):20-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.28.
Zotero 插件