• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质下神经编码的个体变异性塑造了语音线索的权重。

Individual variability in subcortical neural encoding shapes phonetic cue weighting.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 1115 E. 58Th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37212-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37212-y
PMID:37340072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281973/
Abstract

Recent studies have revealed great individual variability in cue weighting, and such variation is shown to be systematic across individuals and linked to differences in some general cognitive mechanism. The present study investigated the role of subcortical encoding as a source of individual variability in cue weighting by focusing on English listeners' frequency following responses to the tense/lax English vowel contrast varying in spectral and durational cues. Listeners differed in early auditory encoding with some encoding the spectral cue more veridically than the durational one, while others exhibited the reverse pattern. These differences in cue encoding further correlate with behavioral variability in cue weighting, suggesting that specificity in cue encoding across individuals modulates how cues are weighted in downstream processes.

摘要

最近的研究揭示了线索加权的巨大个体差异,这种差异在个体之间表现出系统性,并与某些一般认知机制的差异有关。本研究通过关注英语听众对在频谱和持续时间线索上变化的紧张/松弛英语元音对比的频率跟随反应,调查了皮质下编码作为线索加权个体差异来源的作用。一些听众在早期听觉编码中更准确地编码了频谱线索,而另一些听众则表现出相反的模式,听众在线索编码方面存在差异。这些线索编码的差异进一步与线索加权的行为变异性相关,表明个体之间的线索编码特异性调节了线索在下游过程中的权重。

相似文献

1
Individual variability in subcortical neural encoding shapes phonetic cue weighting.皮质下神经编码的个体变异性塑造了语音线索的权重。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37212-y.
2
Dutch listeners' perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach.荷兰听众对英语词汇重音的感知:一种线索加权方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Jun;149(6):3703. doi: 10.1121/10.0005086.
3
The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.以西班牙语和俄语为母语的听众对元音时长的本族语音位变体体验与对英语松紧元音对立的感知之间的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3959. doi: 10.1121/1.2999341.
4
Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.外国语音类别感知适应性的个体差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):355-67. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0987-1.
5
Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.母语为英语的英语听众和韩国英语听众对歧义句的韵律线索加权处理。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):158. doi: 10.1121/10.0009171.
6
Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.个体在处理非言语声音信号方面的差异会影响第二语言语音对比的线索加权策略。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):903-916. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09869-5. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.利用声学线索进行语音识别:频谱退化和电听觉的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Feb;131(2):1465-79. doi: 10.1121/1.3672705.
8
Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.以英语、普通话和俄语为母语者对单词重音感知的声学线索。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Aug;57(4):1468-79. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279.
9
Language Specificity in Phonetic Cue Weighting: Monolingual and Bilingual Perception of the Stop Voicing Contrast in English and Spanish.语音线索权重的语言特异性:英语和西班牙语中塞音清浊对立的单语和双语感知
Phonetica. 2020;77(3):186-208. doi: 10.1159/000497278. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production.语音线索在感知和产生中的权重。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;11(2):e1521. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1521. Epub 2019 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds.验证一种新的范式,用于同时评估对语音的失配响应和频率跟随响应。
J Neurosci Methods. 2024 Dec;412:110277. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110277. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.个体使用自下而上和自上而下的信息导致言语感知灵活性的差异:来自 ERP 和眼动追踪的综合证据。
Brain Lang. 2021 Dec;223:105031. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105031. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.个体在类别渐变中的差异,如在口语识别过程中对语音线索的在线处理所预测的那样:来自眼动的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar;45(3):e12948. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12948.
3
Phonetic discrimination mediates the relationship between auditory brainstem response stability and syntactic performance.语音辨别能力调节了听觉脑干反应稳定性与句法表现之间的关系。
Brain Lang. 2020 Sep;208:104810. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104810. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.与语音感知中声学线索加权的语言差异相关的脑干和早期皮质听觉活动。
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Sep 14;735:135154. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135154. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Differences in cue weights for speech perception are correlated for individuals within and across contrasts.个体在同一和跨对比条件下对言语感知的线索权重差异具有相关性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):EL172. doi: 10.1121/1.5052025.
6
Linguistic effect on speech perception observed at the brainstem.在脑干观察到的言语感知的语言效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):8716-8721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800186115. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Tracing the Trajectory of Sensory Plasticity across Different Stages of Speech Learning in Adulthood.追踪成年后不同阶段言语学习中感觉可塑性的轨迹。
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1419-1427.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.言语范畴知觉中的个体差异:线索权重与执行功能。
J Phon. 2016 Nov;59:40-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.评估音素分类中梯度的来源和功能:一种个体差异方法。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1594-1611. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000410. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.频率跟随反应中的个体差异:与音高感知的关系。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152374. eCollection 2016.