• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管动力模式在食管裂孔旁疝患者与滑动性食管裂孔疝患者中的比较:大不一定好。

Esophageal Motility Patterns in Paraesophageal Hernia Patients Compared to Sliding Hiatal Hernia: Bigger Is Not Better.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Department of Surgery, VA Puget Sound HCS, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2039-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05754-1. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-023-05754-1
PMID:37340102
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with paraesophageal hernias (PEH), the course of the esophagus is often altered, which may affect esophageal motility. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is frequently used to evaluate esophageal motor function prior to PEH repair. This study was performed to characterize esophageal motility disorders in patients with PEH as compared to sliding hiatal hernia and to determine how these findings affect operative decision-making.

METHODS

Patients referred for HRM to a single institution from 2015 to 2019 were included in a prospectively maintained database. HRM studies were analyzed for the appearance of any esophageal motility disorder using the Chicago classification. PEH patients had confirmation of their diagnosis at the time of surgery, and the type of fundoplication performed was recorded. They were case-matched based on sex, age, and BMI to patients with sliding hiatal hernia who were referred for HRM in the same period.

RESULTS

There were 306 patients diagnosed with a PEH who underwent repair. When compared to case-matched sliding hiatal hernia patients, PEH patients had higher rates of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (p<.001) and lower rates of absent peristalsis (p=.048). Of those with ineffective motility (n=70), 41 (59%) had a partial or no fundoplication performed during PEH repair.

CONCLUSION

PEH patients had higher rates of IEM compared to controls, possibly due to a chronically distorted esophageal lumen. Offering the appropriate operation hinges on understanding the involved anatomy and esophageal function of each individual. HRM is important to obtain preoperatively for optimizing patient and procedure selection in PEH repair.

摘要

背景

在食管裂孔旁疝(PEH)患者中,食管的走行常常发生改变,这可能会影响食管动力。高分辨率测压(HRM)常用于 PEH 修补术前评估食管动力功能。本研究旨在比较 PEH 患者与滑动型食管裂孔疝患者的食管动力障碍特征,并确定这些发现如何影响手术决策。

方法

本研究纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在一家机构进行 HRM 检查的患者。使用芝加哥分类标准分析 HRM 研究中任何食管动力障碍的表现。PEH 患者在手术时确诊,并记录所行胃底折叠术的类型。根据性别、年龄和 BMI 与同期接受 HRM 检查的滑动型食管裂孔疝患者进行病例匹配。

结果

共有 306 例 PEH 患者接受了修补术。与病例匹配的滑动型食管裂孔疝患者相比,PEH 患者无效食管动力(IEM)的发生率更高(p<.001),无蠕动的发生率更低(p=.048)。在无效动力的患者中(n=70),41 例(59%)在 PEH 修补术中行部分或无胃底折叠术。

结论

与对照组相比,PEH 患者的 IEM 发生率更高,这可能是由于食管腔长期扭曲所致。选择合适的手术取决于对每位患者的相关解剖结构和食管功能的理解。HRM 对术前获得并优化 PEH 修补术患者和手术选择非常重要。

相似文献

1
Esophageal Motility Patterns in Paraesophageal Hernia Patients Compared to Sliding Hiatal Hernia: Bigger Is Not Better.食管动力模式在食管裂孔旁疝患者与滑动性食管裂孔疝患者中的比较:大不一定好。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2039-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05754-1. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with poor esophageal motility or paraesophageal herniation.腹腔镜下食管动力差或食管旁疝患者的食管裂孔疝修补术。
Am Surg. 2001 Oct;67(10):987-91.
3
Changes in esophageal physiology after paraesophageal hernia repair and Collis gastroplasty.食管旁疝修补和柯林斯胃成形术后食管生理学的变化。
Esophagus. 2021 Apr;18(2):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00766-1. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术和胃底折叠术后的食管动力及预后
Am J Surg. 1999 May;177(5):359-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00062-8.
5
Vagotomy during hiatal hernia repair: a benign esophageal lengthening procedure.食管裂孔疝修补术中的迷走神经切断术:一种良性食管延长手术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jul;12(7):1155-62. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0520-0. Epub 2008 May 8.
6
Investigating rates of reoperation or postsurgical gastroparesis following fundoplication or paraesophageal hernia repair in New York State.调查纽约州胃底折叠术或食管裂孔疝修补术后再次手术或术后胃轻瘫的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2886-2894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6588-z. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Fundoplication at the time of paraesophageal hernia repair may not reduce postoperative reflux.胃底折叠术在食管裂孔疝修补术中可能无法减少术后反流。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jan;28(1):70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.11.013.
8
The need for fundoplication at the time of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术时进行胃底折叠术的必要性。
Am Surg. 2013 Jun;79(6):572-7.
9
Novel "starburst" mesh configuration for paraesophageal and recurrent hiatal hernia repair: comparison with keyhole mesh configuration.新型“星爆”网片修补食管旁疝和复发性食管裂孔疝的效果:与“钥匙孔”网片修补的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09447-9. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
10
Paraesophageal hernia repair in the emergency setting: is laparoscopy with the addition of a fundoplication the new gold standard?急诊情况下的食管旁疝修补术:添加胃底折叠术的腹腔镜手术是新的金标准吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1790-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4447-8. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Can intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) during anti-reflux surgery replace preoperative manometry with no difference in patient outcomes?抗反流手术中使用术中阻抗平面测量法(EndoFLIP™)能否替代术前测压,且患者预后无差异?
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12030-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient?胃食管结合部流出道梗阻和食管裂孔疝:疝修补术单独治疗足够吗?
JSLS. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051.
2
Clinical Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Total vs a 270° Posterior Partial Fundoplication in Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜全胃底折叠术与 270°后部分胃底折叠术治疗慢性胃食管反流病的临床结局:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):473-480. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0805.
3
Solid bolus swallows during high-resolution manometry complement multiple rapid swallows in predicting symptoms following antireflux surgery.
高分辨率测压时固体团块吞咽可补充多次快速吞咽,有助于预测抗反流手术后的症状。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Aug;34(8):e14336. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14336. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Is fundoplication necessary after paraesophageal hernia repair? A meta-analysis and systematic review.食管裂孔疝修补术后是否需要行胃底折叠术?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6300-6311. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09024-0. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) reveals changes in gastroesophageal junction compliance during fundoplication.阻抗平面测量法(EndoFLIP™)显示胃食管交界处顺应性在胃底折叠术期间的变化。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6801-6808. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08966-1. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Chicago classification version 4.0 technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.芝加哥分类版本 4.0 技术审查:食管动力评估标准高分辨率测压协议的更新。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Apr;33(4):e14120. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14120. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Chicago Classification update (v4.0): Technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function.芝加哥分类更新(第 4.0 版):食管下括约肌屏障功能高分辨率测压学指标的技术评价。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct;33(10):e14113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14113. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?芝加哥分类版本 4.0 有哪些新内容?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jan;33(1):e14053. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14053. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
9
Patterns of esophageal dysmotility elicited by multiple rapid swallows.多口快速吞咽诱发的食管动力障碍模式。
Esophagus. 2021 Apr;18(2):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00784-z. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
10
Response to multiple rapid swallows shows impaired inhibitory pathways in distal esophageal spasm patients with and without concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.对多次快速吞咽的反应表明,伴有和不伴有食管胃结合部流出道梗阻的远端食管痉挛患者存在抑制通路受损。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Oct 12;33(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa048.