• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于方面的疫苗错误信息分类:使用 Twitter 消息进行的时空分析。

Aspect-based classification of vaccine misinformation: a spatiotemporal analysis using Twitter chatter.

机构信息

College of Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

College of Engineering, Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16067-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16067-y
PMID:37340455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10283216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spread of misinformation of all types threatens people's safety and interrupts resolutions. COVID-19 vaccination has been a widely discussed topic on social media platforms with numerous misleading and fallacious information. This false information has a critical impact on the safety of society as it prevents many people from taking the vaccine, decelerating the world's ability to go back to normal. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the content shared on social media platforms, detect misinformation, identify aspects of misinformation, and efficiently represent related statistics to combat the spread of misleading information about the vaccine. This paper aims to support stakeholders in decision-making by providing solid and current insights into the spatiotemporal progression of the common misinformation aspects of the various available vaccines.

METHODS

Approximately 3800 tweets were annotated into four expert-verified aspects of vaccine misinformation obtained from reliable medical resources. Next, an Aspect-based Misinformation Analysis Framework was designed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, which is one of the most advanced, fast, and efficient machine learning models to date. Based on this dataset, spatiotemporal statistical analysis was performed to infer insights into the progression of aspects of vaccine misinformation among the public. Finally, the Pearson correlation coefficient and p-values are calculated for the global misinformation count against the vaccination counts of 43 countries from December 2020 until July 2021.

RESULTS

The optimized classification per class (i.e., per an aspect of misinformation) accuracy was 87.4%, 92.7%, 80.1%, and 82.5% for the "Vaccine Constituent," "Adverse Effects," "Agenda," "Efficacy and Clinical Trials" aspects, respectively. The model achieved an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 90.3% and 89.6% for validation and testing, respectively, which indicates the reliability of the proposed framework in detecting aspects of vaccine misinformation on Twitter. The correlation analysis shows that 37% of the countries addressed in this study were negatively affected by the spread of misinformation on Twitter resulting in reduced number of administered vaccines during the same timeframe.

CONCLUSIONS

Twitter is a rich source of insight on the progression of vaccine misinformation among the public. Machine Learning models, such as LightGBM, are efficient for multi-class classification and proved reliable in classifying vaccine misinformation aspects even with limited samples in social media datasets.

摘要

背景

各种类型的错误信息的传播威胁着人们的安全并阻碍了解决问题的进程。新冠疫苗在社交媒体平台上是一个被广泛讨论的话题,其中充斥着大量的误导性和错误信息。这些虚假信息对社会安全产生了重大影响,因为它阻止了许多人接种疫苗,减缓了世界恢复正常的速度。因此,分析社交媒体平台上分享的内容、检测错误信息、识别错误信息的各个方面,并有效地表示相关统计数据,以打击有关疫苗的误导性信息的传播,这一点至关重要。本文旨在通过提供关于各种可用疫苗的常见错误信息方面的可靠和当前的深入见解,为利益相关者的决策提供支持。

方法

从可靠的医疗资源中获取四个经过专家验证的疫苗错误信息方面,对大约 3800 条推文进行了标注。然后,使用 Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) 模型设计了一个基于方面的错误信息分析框架,LightGBM 是迄今为止最先进、最快、最有效的机器学习模型之一。基于这个数据集,对空间和时间进行了统计分析,以推断公众对疫苗错误信息方面的发展趋势。最后,计算了从 2020 年 12 月到 2021 年 7 月,43 个国家的全球错误信息计数与疫苗接种计数之间的皮尔逊相关系数和 p 值。

结果

针对每个类别的分类准确率(即针对错误信息的一个方面)分别为 87.4%、92.7%、80.1%和 82.5%,用于“疫苗成分”、“不良反应”、“议程”和“疗效和临床试验”方面。该模型在验证和测试中的 AUC 分别为 90.3%和 89.6%,这表明了该框架在检测 Twitter 上的疫苗错误信息方面的可靠性。相关性分析表明,在本研究中涉及的 37%的国家受到了 Twitter 上错误信息传播的负面影响,导致同一时期接种疫苗的人数减少。

结论

Twitter 是了解公众对疫苗错误信息发展趋势的丰富信息来源。机器学习模型(如 LightGBM)非常适合多类分类,并且即使在社交媒体数据集的样本有限的情况下,也被证明在分类疫苗错误信息方面非常可靠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/7f98419fe444/12889_2023_16067_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ecb017fed68c/12889_2023_16067_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/5e78d9299bf5/12889_2023_16067_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ae3eb6585f75/12889_2023_16067_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ec286dbac5ec/12889_2023_16067_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/0eeb9b130c0a/12889_2023_16067_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/fe6624129132/12889_2023_16067_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/2bba5e07e1fc/12889_2023_16067_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/3368e782244b/12889_2023_16067_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/7f98419fe444/12889_2023_16067_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ecb017fed68c/12889_2023_16067_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/5e78d9299bf5/12889_2023_16067_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ae3eb6585f75/12889_2023_16067_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/ec286dbac5ec/12889_2023_16067_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/0eeb9b130c0a/12889_2023_16067_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/fe6624129132/12889_2023_16067_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/2bba5e07e1fc/12889_2023_16067_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/3368e782244b/12889_2023_16067_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed3/10283216/7f98419fe444/12889_2023_16067_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Aspect-based classification of vaccine misinformation: a spatiotemporal analysis using Twitter chatter.基于方面的疫苗错误信息分类:使用 Twitter 消息进行的时空分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16067-y.
2
One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study.《推特上一年的 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息:纵向研究》。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 24;25:e42227. doi: 10.2196/42227.
3
ANTi-Vax: a novel Twitter dataset for COVID-19 vaccine misinformation detection.抗疫苗:用于 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息检测的新型 Twitter 数据集。
Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
5
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:快速综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367.
6
Spread of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation in the Ninth Inning: Retrospective Observational Infodemic Study.新冠疫苗错误信息在最后阶段的传播:回顾性观察性信息疫情研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Mar 16;2(1):e33587. doi: 10.2196/33587. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
7
People's Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 Despite Their Safety Concerns: Twitter Poll Analysis.尽管存在安全顾虑,但人们对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿:Twitter 民意调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e28973. doi: 10.2196/28973.
8
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
9
Multi-label multi-class COVID-19 Arabic Twitter dataset with fine-grained misinformation and situational information annotations.具有细粒度错误信息和情境信息注释的多标签多类别新冠疫情阿拉伯语推特数据集
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Dec 5;8:e1151. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1151. eCollection 2022.
10
Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter COVID-19 conversations.跨平台传播:在早期 Twitter COVID-19 对话中分享的 YouTube 视频中的疫苗相关内容、来源和阴谋论。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2003647. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Infodemic Responses: A Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in Italy.映射信息疫情应对措施:意大利推特上关于新冠疫情的地理空间分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;22(5):668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050668.
2
Twitter (X) in Medicine: Friend or Foe to the Field of Interventional Cardiology?医学领域中的推特(X):介入心脏病学领域的朋友还是敌人?
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Sep 17;2(6Part A):101136. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101136. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.信息疫情与健康错误信息:系统综述。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):544-561. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations Among Adults During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance, by Race/Ethnicity and Vaccination Status - COVID-NET, 14 States, July 2021-January 2022.COVID-19 相关住院病例在 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株流行期间的种族/民族差异和疫苗接种状况分析——COVID-NET,14 个州,2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 25;71(12):466-473. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7112e2.
3
Conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 in Nigeria: Implications for vaccine demand generation communications.
尼日利亚关于 COVID-19 的阴谋论和错误信息:对疫苗需求产生沟通的影响。
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 18;40(13):2114-2121. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
ANTi-Vax: a novel Twitter dataset for COVID-19 vaccine misinformation detection.抗疫苗:用于 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息检测的新型 Twitter 数据集。
Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
5
Twitter sentiment analysis from Iran about COVID 19 vaccine.推特上关于新冠疫苗的伊朗民众情绪分析。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Jan;16(1):102367. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102367. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data.基于深度学习的从推特数据中分析 COVID-19 疫苗接种反应的情绪。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 2;2021:4321131. doi: 10.1155/2021/4321131. eCollection 2021.
7
Using Twitter for sentiment analysis towards AstraZeneca/Oxford, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.使用 Twitter 对阿斯利康/牛津、辉瑞/BioNTech 和莫德纳 COVID-19 疫苗进行情绪分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2022 Jul;98(1161):544-550. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140685. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter.对 Twitter 上有关 COVID-19 疫苗情绪和观点的分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations.一个全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种数据库。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):947-953. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
The UK has approved a COVID vaccine - here's what scientists now want to know.英国已批准一种新冠疫苗——以下是科学家们目前想了解的情况。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):205-206. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03441-8.