• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情防控政策活动水平及演变模式的全球分析:一项横断面研究。

Global analysis of the COVID-19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Chen Meiqian, Dong Yucheng, Shi Xiaoping, Zhuang Jun

机构信息

Center for Network Big Data and Decision-Making, Business School Sichuan University Chengdu China.

Xiangjiang Laboratory Changsha China.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 18;6(6):e1350. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1350. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1350
PMID:37342293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10277603/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of government policies have been implemented worldwide in response to the global spread of COVID-19. This paper aims at developing a data-driven analysis to answer the three research questions: (a) Compared to the pandemic development, are the global government COVID-19 policies sufficiently active? (b) What are the differences and characteristics in the policy activity levels at the country level? (c) What types of COVID-19 policy patterns are forming?

METHODS

Using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker data set, we present a global analysis of the COVID-19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022, based on the differential expression-sliding window analysis (DE-SWAN) algorithm and the clustering ensemble algorithm.

RESULTS

Within the period under study, the results indicate that (a) the global government policy responses to COVID-19 are very active, and the policy activity levels are significantly higher than those of global pandemic developments; (b) a high activity of policy is positively correlated to pandemic prevention at the country level; and (c) a high human development index (HDI) score is negatively correlated to the country policy activity level. Furthermore, we propose to categorize the global policy evolution patterns into three categories: (i) Mainstream (152 countries); (ii) China; and (iii) Others (34 countries).

CONCLUSION

This work is one of the few studies that quantitatively explores the evolutionary characteristics of global government policies on COVID-19, and our results provide some new perspectives on global policy activity levels and evolution patterns.

摘要

背景与目的

自2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情开始以来,全球范围内实施了大量政府政策以应对COVID-19的全球传播。本文旨在开展一项数据驱动分析,以回答三个研究问题:(a)与疫情发展相比,全球政府的COVID-19政策是否足够积极?(b)国家层面的政策活动水平有哪些差异和特点?(c)正在形成哪些类型的COVID-19政策模式?

方法

利用牛津COVID-19政府应对追踪数据集,我们基于差异表达-滑动窗口分析(DE-SWAN)算法和聚类集成算法,对2020年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间的COVID-19政策活动水平和演变模式进行了全球分析。

结果

在研究期间,结果表明:(a)全球政府对COVID-19的政策应对非常积极,政策活动水平显著高于全球疫情发展水平;(b)国家层面的高政策活动与疫情防控呈正相关;(c)高人类发展指数(HDI)得分与国家政策活动水平呈负相关。此外,我们建议将全球政策演变模式分为三类:(i)主流(152个国家);(ii)中国;(iii)其他(34个国家)。

结论

这项工作是少数定量探索全球政府COVID-19政策演变特征的研究之一,我们的结果为全球政策活动水平和演变模式提供了一些新视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/3b405f311b65/HSR2-6-e1350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/e60c65e8808a/HSR2-6-e1350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/144b196955fa/HSR2-6-e1350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/7ec9a32a2e0e/HSR2-6-e1350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/3b405f311b65/HSR2-6-e1350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/e60c65e8808a/HSR2-6-e1350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/144b196955fa/HSR2-6-e1350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/7ec9a32a2e0e/HSR2-6-e1350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69b/10277603/3b405f311b65/HSR2-6-e1350-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Global analysis of the COVID-19 policy activity levels and evolution patterns: A cross-sectional study.新冠疫情防控政策活动水平及演变模式的全球分析:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 18;6(6):e1350. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1350. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Estimating the COVID-19 Spread Through Real-time Population Mobility Patterns: Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.基于实时人口流动模式估算 COVID-19 传播:在中低收入国家的监测。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e22999. doi: 10.2196/22999.
3
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
4
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
6
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Government interventions and control policies to contain the first COVID-19 outbreak: An analysis of evidence.政府干预和控制政策以遏制首次 COVID-19 疫情爆发:证据分析。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jul;51(5):682-691. doi: 10.1177/14034948231156969. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
HIV policy legacies, pandemic preparedness and policy effort to address COVID-19.艾滋病病毒政策遗产、大流行防范以及应对新冠肺炎的政策努力。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;3(6):e0001767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001767. eCollection 2023.
10
Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个亚级行政区 1990 年至 2021 年 288 种死因及预期寿命的归因分析:全球疾病负担研究 2021 系统分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2100-2132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the restrictions on community activities policy during the COVID-19 on psychological health in Indonesia's urban and rural residents: A cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间社区活动限制政策对印度尼西亚城乡居民心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 7;5(5):e725. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.725. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Counterterrorism resource allocation during a pandemic: The effects of dynamic target valuations when facing a strategic terrorist.大流行期间的反恐资源分配:面对战略恐怖分子时动态目标估值的影响。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jun;43(6):1235-1253. doi: 10.1111/risa.13992. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Medical capacity investment for epidemic disease: The effects of policymaker's confidence and public trust.
疫情下的医疗能力投资:政策制定者信心与公众信任的影响。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jun;43(6):1187-1211. doi: 10.1111/risa.13988. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
China's 'dynamic zero COVID-19 strategy' will face greater challenges in the future.中国的“动态清零”防疫政策未来将面临更大挑战。 需要说明的是,中国的“动态清零”总方针是以最小的社会成本投入获得最大的社会效果,是我国防控策略的最佳选择,有效快速控制疫情,保障了人民生命健康和经济社会持续稳定发展,并不存在面临更大挑战的情况。
J Infect. 2022 Jul;85(1):e13-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Give me liberty or give me COVID-19: How social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and libertarianism explain Americans' reactions to COVID-19.不自由,毋宁死于新冠:社会支配取向、右翼威权主义和自由主义如何解释美国人对新冠疫情的反应。
Risk Anal. 2022 Dec;42(12):2691-2703. doi: 10.1111/risa.13885. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Comparative Study of Government Response Measures and Epidemic Trends for COVID-19 Global Pandemic.COVID-19 全球大流行期间各国政府应对措施与疫情趋势的对比研究。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):40-55. doi: 10.1111/risa.13817. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
7
A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.一项针对 COVID-19 防护行为依从性变化和假设的大流行疲劳的全球评估。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1145-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01181-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission across 130 countries and territories.非药物干预措施对 130 个国家和地区的 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01872-8.
10
The false promise of herd immunity for COVID-19.新冠病毒群体免疫的虚假承诺。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):26-28. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02948-4.