Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Sep 1;46(9):1619-1625. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0460.
Valid and reliable diabetes distress assessment is essential for identifying adults with elevated levels of concern and to guide targeted support. However, assessing diabetes distress must also be feasible in time-limited settings. We aimed to identify a short-form measure of the 28-item Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS-28) representing seven sources of type 1 diabetes distress that would be convenient for use in clinical practice.
Based on the evaluation of influence and importance by 14 experts in diabetes care and research, we identified the best-performing item within each of seven sources of diabetes distress included in the T1-DDS-28. To further validate the proposed short-form measure, we used survey data from 2,016 adults living with type 1 diabetes. Validity was examined by exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α, test-retest reliability analysis, and correlations with other psychosocial measures.
We identified a short-form measure of the T1-DDS-28 consisting of seven items, each representing a source of diabetes distress. These items showed satisfactory reliability (factor loadings > 0.45; α = 0.82; test-retest correlation, r = 0.90) and validity (correlation with T1-DDS-28, r = 0.95; area under the curve = 0.91; sensitivity 93%; specificity 89%) when combined in the short-form scale (T1-DDS-7).
We propose the T1-DDS-7 as a valid and reliable measure for routine screening of diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes. In case of elevated levels of diabetes distress, we recommend that a full-scale assessment and open dialogue follow the short-form measure before determining further treatment.
有效的、可靠的糖尿病困扰评估对于识别出高度关注的成年人并提供针对性的支持至关重要。然而,在时间有限的情况下,评估糖尿病困扰也必须是可行的。我们旨在确定一种 28 项 1 型糖尿病困扰量表(T1-DDS-28)的简短形式测量方法,该方法代表七种 1 型糖尿病困扰源,方便在临床实践中使用。
基于 14 位糖尿病护理和研究专家对影响和重要性的评估,我们确定了 T1-DDS-28 中包含的七种糖尿病困扰源中每项表现最佳的项目。为了进一步验证所提出的简短形式测量方法,我们使用了 2016 名患有 1 型糖尿病的成年人的调查数据。通过探索性因素分析、克朗巴赫 α 可靠性分析、重测信度分析以及与其他心理社会测量方法的相关性来评估有效性。
我们确定了一种 T1-DDS-28 的简短形式测量方法,由七个项目组成,每个项目代表一种糖尿病困扰源。这些项目表现出令人满意的可靠性(因子负荷>0.45;α=0.82;重测相关系数,r=0.90)和有效性(与 T1-DDS-28 的相关性,r=0.95;曲线下面积=0.91;灵敏度 93%;特异性 89%),当它们组合在简短形式量表(T1-DDS-7)中时。
我们建议 T1-DDS-7 作为一种有效的、可靠的测量方法,用于常规筛查 1 型糖尿病成年人的糖尿病困扰。如果糖尿病困扰水平升高,我们建议在确定进一步治疗之前,使用完整的评估和开放的对话来跟进简短形式的测量。