• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)临床前放射组学输出中肺轮廓勾画方法的变异性评估

Assessment of Variabilities in Lung-Contouring Methods on CBCT Preclinical Radiomics Outputs.

作者信息

Brown Kathryn H, Illyuk Jacob, Ghita Mihaela, Walls Gerard M, McGarry Conor K, Butterworth Karl T

机构信息

Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK.

Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7JL, UK.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 9;15(10):2677. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102677.

DOI:10.3390/cancers15102677
PMID:37345013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10216427/
Abstract

Radiomics image analysis has the potential to uncover disease characteristics for the development of predictive signatures and personalised radiotherapy treatment. Inter-observer and inter-software delineation variabilities are known to have downstream effects on radiomics features, reducing the reliability of the analysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of these variabilities on radiomics outputs from preclinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Inter-observer variabilities were assessed using manual and semi-automated contours of mouse lungs ( = 16). Inter-software variabilities were determined between two tools (3D Slicer and ITK-SNAP). The contours were compared using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores and the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD) metrics. The good reliability of the radiomics outputs was defined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and their 95% confidence intervals. The median DSC scores were high (0.82-0.94), and the HD metrics were within the submillimetre range for all comparisons. the shape and NGTDM features were impacted the most. Manual contours had the most reliable features (73%), followed by semi-automated (66%) and inter-software (51%) variabilities. From a total of 842 features, 314 robust features overlapped across all contouring methodologies. In addition, our results have a 70% overlap with features identified from clinical inter-observer studies.

摘要

放射组学图像分析有潜力揭示疾病特征,以开发预测性特征和个性化放射治疗方案。已知观察者间和软件间的轮廓勾画变异性会对放射组学特征产生下游影响,降低分析的可靠性。本研究的目的是调查这些变异性对临床前锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像的放射组学输出的影响。使用小鼠肺部的手动和半自动轮廓(n = 16)评估观察者间变异性。在两种工具(3D Slicer和ITK-SNAP)之间确定软件间变异性。使用骰子相似系数(DSC)分数和豪斯多夫距离(HD)指标的第95百分位数比较轮廓。使用组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%置信区间定义放射组学输出的良好可靠性。所有比较的DSC分数中位数都很高(0.82 - 0.94),HD指标在亚毫米范围内。形状和邻域灰度差矩阵(NGTDM)特征受影响最大。手动轮廓具有最可靠的特征(73%),其次是半自动(66%)和软件间(51%)变异性。在总共842个特征中,314个稳健特征在所有轮廓勾画方法中重叠。此外,我们的结果与临床观察者间研究确定的特征有70%的重叠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/d27fd1d8cb50/cancers-15-02677-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/f98bab139e85/cancers-15-02677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/1bcdcd645526/cancers-15-02677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/01208116d296/cancers-15-02677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/650b6dffc715/cancers-15-02677-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/592c2ae41afe/cancers-15-02677-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/d27fd1d8cb50/cancers-15-02677-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/f98bab139e85/cancers-15-02677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/1bcdcd645526/cancers-15-02677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/01208116d296/cancers-15-02677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/650b6dffc715/cancers-15-02677-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/592c2ae41afe/cancers-15-02677-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe35/10216427/d27fd1d8cb50/cancers-15-02677-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Variabilities in Lung-Contouring Methods on CBCT Preclinical Radiomics Outputs.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)临床前放射组学输出中肺轮廓勾画方法的变异性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 9;15(10):2677. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102677.
2
Lung tumor segmentation methods: Impact on the uncertainty of radiomics features for non-small cell lung cancer.肺肿瘤分割方法:对非小细胞肺癌放射组学特征不确定性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205003. eCollection 2018.
3
The impact of inter-observer variation in delineation on robustness of radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer.观察者间勾画差异对非小细胞肺癌放射组学特征稳健性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16520-9.
4
Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.评价一个商业的 DIR 平台在接受调强放疗/VMAT 治疗的前列腺癌患者中的靶区勾画。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Feb;21(2):14-25. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12787.
5
Auto-segmentation, radiomic reproducibility, and comparison of radiomics between manual and AI-derived segmentations for coronary arteries in cardiac [F]NaF PET/CT images.心脏[F]NaF PET/CT图像中冠状动脉的自动分割、影像组学可重复性以及手动分割与人工智能衍生分割之间的影像组学比较。
EJNMMI Phys. 2025 Apr 27;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40658-025-00751-6.
6
A comparative analysis of preclinical computed tomography radiomics using cone-beam and micro-computed tomography scanners.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描和微型计算机断层扫描扫描仪对临床前计算机断层扫描放射组学进行的比较分析。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 23;31:100615. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100615. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Automatic contouring of normal tissues with deep learning for preclinical radiation studies.基于深度学习的临床前放射研究中正常组织的自动勾画。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Feb 9;67(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4da3.
8
Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation.使用半自动体积分割进行稳健的放射组学特征量化。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e102107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102107. eCollection 2014.
9
Radiomics as a measure superior to common similarity metrics for tumor segmentation performance evaluation.放射组学作为一种优于常用相似性度量的肿瘤分割性能评估方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Aug;25(8):e14442. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14442. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
10
Rapid Contour-based Segmentation for F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Tumors by Using ITK-SNAP: Comparison to Expert-based Segmentation.基于快速轮廓的肺肿瘤 F-FDG PET 成像分割:与专家分割的比较
Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):277-284. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171756. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensemble methods and partially-supervised learning for accurate and robust automatic murine organ segmentation.用于准确且稳健的自动小鼠器官分割的集成方法和部分监督学习
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05954-6.
2
A comparative analysis of preclinical computed tomography radiomics using cone-beam and micro-computed tomography scanners.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描和微型计算机断层扫描扫描仪对临床前计算机断层扫描放射组学进行的比较分析。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 23;31:100615. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100615. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Radiomics as a measure superior to common similarity metrics for tumor segmentation performance evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of inter-observer variation in delineation on robustness of radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer.观察者间勾画差异对非小细胞肺癌放射组学特征稳健性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16520-9.
2
A scoping review of small animal image-guided radiotherapy research: Advances, impact and future opportunities in translational radiobiology.小动物图像引导放射治疗研究的范围综述:转化放射生物学的进展、影响及未来机遇
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 6;34:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.004. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Deep Learning-based Automatic Lung Segmentation on Multiresolution CT Scans from Healthy and Fibrotic Lungs in Mice.
放射组学作为一种优于常用相似性度量的肿瘤分割性能评估方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Aug;25(8):e14442. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14442. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
4
Exploring the Application of the Artificial-Intelligence-Integrated Platform 3D Slicer in Medical Imaging Education.探索人工智能集成平台3D Slicer在医学影像教育中的应用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;14(2):146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020146.
5
Development and optimisation of a preclinical cone beam computed tomography-based radiomics workflow for radiation oncology research.基于临床前锥形束计算机断层扫描的放射组学工作流程的开发与优化,用于放射肿瘤学研究。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 May 16;26:100446. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100446. eCollection 2023 Apr.
基于深度学习的小鼠健康肺和纤维化肺多分辨率CT扫描的自动肺分割
Radiol Artif Intell. 2022 Jan 12;4(2):e210095. doi: 10.1148/ryai.210095. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Automatic contouring of normal tissues with deep learning for preclinical radiation studies.基于深度学习的临床前放射研究中正常组织的自动勾画。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Feb 9;67(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4da3.
5
Impact of Interobserver Variability in Manual Segmentation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Applying Low-Rank Radiomic Representation on Computed Tomography.应用低秩放射组学表征对计算机断层扫描上的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行手动分割时观察者间变异性的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 28;13(23):5985. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235985.
6
Reproducibility and Repeatability of CBCT-Derived Radiomics Features.基于CBCT的影像组学特征的可重复性和再现性
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 17;11:773512. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.773512. eCollection 2021.
7
Radiomics for Predicting Lung Cancer Outcomes Following Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.用于预测肺癌放疗后结局的影像组学:一项系统综述
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Mar;34(3):e107-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
8
Radiomics feature reliability assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient: a systematic review.通过组内相关系数评估的影像组学特征可靠性:一项系统评价
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Oct;11(10):4431-4460. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-86.
9
Effects of interobserver and interdisciplinary segmentation variabilities on CT-based radiomics for pancreatic cancer.观察者间和学科间分割变异性对基于 CT 的胰腺癌放射组学的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 11;11(1):16328. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95152-x.
10
Deep Learning Segmentation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft (PDX) and Sensitivity of Radiomic Pipeline to Tumor Probability Boundary.三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者来源肿瘤异种移植(PDX)的深度学习分割及影像组学流程对肿瘤概率边界的敏感性
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;13(15):3795. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153795.