Walls G M, Osman S O S, Brown K H, Butterworth K T, Hanna G G, Hounsell A R, McGarry C K, Leijenaar R T H, Lambin P, Cole A J, Jain S
Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; Cancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; Cancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Mar;34(3):e107-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Lung cancer's radiomic phenotype may potentially inform clinical decision-making with respect to radical radiotherapy. At present there are no validated biomarkers available for the individualisation of radical radiotherapy in lung cancer and the mortality rate of this disease remains the highest of all other solid tumours. MEDLINE was searched using the terms 'radiomics' and 'lung cancer' according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Met-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Radiomics studies were defined as those manuscripts describing the extraction and analysis of at least 10 quantifiable imaging features. Only those studies assessing disease control, survival or toxicity outcomes for patients with lung cancer following radical radiotherapy ± chemotherapy were included. Study titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Radiomics Quality Score was applied to the full text of included papers. Of 244 returned results, 44 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. End points frequently reported were local (17%), regional (17%) and distant control (31%), overall survival (79%) and pulmonary toxicity (4%). Imaging features strongly associated with clinical outcomes include texture features belonging to the subclasses Gray level run length matrix, Gray level co-occurrence matrix and kurtosis. The median cohort size for model development was 100 (15-645); in the 11 studies with external validation in a separate independent population, the median cohort size was 84 (21-295). The median number of imaging features extracted was 184 (10-6538). The median Radiomics Quality Score was 11% (0-47). Patient-reported outcomes were not incorporated within any studies identified. No studies externally validated a radiomics signature in a registered prospective study. Imaging-derived indices attained through radiomic analyses could equip thoracic oncologists with biomarkers for treatment response, patterns of failure, normal tissue toxicity and survival in lung cancer. Based on routine scans, their non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness are major advantages over conventional pathological assessment. Improved tools are required for the appraisal of radiomics studies, as significant barriers to clinical implementation remain, such as standardisation of input scan data, quality of reporting and external validation of signatures in randomised, interventional clinical trials.
肺癌的放射组学表型可能会为根治性放疗的临床决策提供依据。目前,尚无经过验证的生物标志物可用于肺癌根治性放疗的个体化,且该疾病的死亡率在所有其他实体瘤中仍然最高。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在MEDLINE中使用“放射组学”和“肺癌”进行检索。放射组学研究被定义为那些描述至少10个可量化影像特征的提取和分析的手稿。仅纳入那些评估肺癌患者在接受根治性放疗±化疗后的疾病控制、生存或毒性结果的研究。研究标题和摘要由两名独立的评审员进行审查。将放射组学质量评分应用于纳入论文的全文。在返回的244项结果中,44项研究符合纳入标准。经常报告的终点包括局部控制(17%)、区域控制(17%)和远处控制(31%)、总生存(79%)和肺部毒性(4%)。与临床结果密切相关的影像特征包括属于灰度行程长度矩阵、灰度共生矩阵和峰度子类的纹理特征。模型开发的队列中位数大小为100(15 - 645);在11项在单独独立人群中进行外部验证的研究中,队列中位数大小为84(21 - 295)。提取的影像特征中位数为184(10 - 6538)。放射组学质量评分中位数为11%(0 - 47)。在任何已识别的研究中均未纳入患者报告的结果。没有研究在注册的前瞻性研究中对放射组学特征进行外部验证。通过放射组学分析获得的影像衍生指标可为胸科肿瘤学家提供肺癌治疗反应、失败模式、正常组织毒性和生存的生物标志物。基于常规扫描,其非侵入性和成本效益是相对于传统病理评估的主要优势。由于临床实施仍存在重大障碍,如输入扫描数据的标准化、报告质量以及在随机干预性临床试验中对特征的外部验证,因此需要改进放射组学研究的评估工具。