Sher Marilyn A, Oliver Caroline
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Woodlands Consulting & Therapy, Norwich, UK.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 14;30(3):229-248. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006097. eCollection 2023.
The study aimed to establish a normative data set for the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS) and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomology (SIMS) in a community adult sample of high functioning autistic (HFA) people. Assessments were administered anonymously online. Seventy surveys were completed, with respondents contributing from 16 countries. The majority of subscales and total scores for the PDS and SIMS fell above cut-off for self-report response bias, suggesting that completion of these measures by HFA individuals may lead to conclusions of intentional response distortion, even when this is not the case. Significant relationships were found between high scores and education level, as well as psychological distress. The findings of the study raise concerns about the use of these measures with HFA people, particularly in 'high stakes' situations.
该研究旨在为高功能自闭症(HFA)成年社区样本建立保罗hus欺骗量表(PDS)和伪装症状结构化量表(SIMS)的常模数据集。评估通过在线匿名方式进行。共完成了70份调查问卷,受访者来自16个国家。PDS和SIMS的大多数子量表及总分高于自我报告反应偏差的临界值,这表明HFA个体完成这些测量可能会导致得出故意反应失真的结论,即使实际并非如此。研究发现高分与教育水平以及心理困扰之间存在显著关系。该研究结果引发了对在HFA人群中使用这些测量方法的担忧,尤其是在“高风险”情况下。