a Forensic Psychology Section , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(8):1336-65. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.984763. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
We meta-analytically reviewed studies that used the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) to detect feigned psychopathology. We present weighted mean diagnostic accuracy and predictive power indices in various populations, based on 31 studies, including 61 subsamples and 4009 SIMS protocols. In addition, we provide normative data of patients, claimants, defendants, nonclinical adults, and various experimental feigners, based on 41 studies, including 125 subsamples and 4810 SIMS protocols. We conclude that the SIMS (1) is able to differentiate well between instructed feigners and honest responders; (2) generates heightened scores in groups that are known to have a raised prevalence of feigning (e.g., offenders who claim crime-related amnesia); (3) may overestimate feigning in patients who suffer from schizophrenia, intellectual disability, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures; and (4) is fairly robust against coaching. The diagnostic power of the traditional cut scores of the SIMS (i.e., > 14 and > 16) is not so much limited by their sensitivity—which is satisfactory—but rather by their substandard specificity. This, however, can be worked around by combining the SIMS with other symptom validity measures and by raising the cut score, although the latter solution sacrifices sensitivity for specificity.
我们对使用《伪装症状量表》(SIMS)来检测伪装精神病理学的研究进行了荟萃分析。我们根据 31 项研究,包括 61 个子样本和 4009 份 SIMS 协议,给出了不同人群中加权平均诊断准确性和预测效力指数。此外,我们还根据 41 项研究,包括 125 个子样本和 4810 份 SIMS 协议,提供了患者、索赔人、被告、非临床成年人和各种实验性伪装者的常模数据。我们的结论是,SIMS(1)能够很好地区分指令性伪装者和诚实的应答者;(2)在已知伪装率较高的群体中产生较高的分数(例如,声称与犯罪有关的遗忘症的罪犯);(3)在患有精神分裂症、智力障碍或心因性非癫痫性发作的患者中可能高估伪装;(4)对辅导有相当的抵抗力。SIMS 的传统切割分数(即 >14 和 >16)的诊断能力不是受到其敏感性(令人满意)的限制,而是受到其标准特异性的限制。然而,通过将 SIMS 与其他症状有效性测量结合起来,并提高切割分数,可以解决这个问题,尽管后者的解决方案是以牺牲敏感性为代价来提高特异性。