• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苹果、谷歌和 Meta 的移动数据集中的趋同。

Convergence in Mobility Data Sets From Apple, Google, and Meta.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, Izaak Walton Killam Health Center, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 22;9:e44286. doi: 10.2196/44286.

DOI:10.2196/44286
PMID:37347516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10337444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The higher movement of people was one of the variables that contributed to the spread of the infectious agent SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Governments worldwide responded to the virus by implementing measures that would restrict people's movements, and consequently, the spread of the disease. During the onset of the pandemic, the technology companies Apple, Google, and Meta used their infrastructure to anonymously gather mobility reports from their users.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare mobility data reports collected by Apple, Google, and Meta (formerly Facebook) during the COVID-19 pandemic and a major winter storm in Texas in 2021. We aim to explore the hypothesis that different people exhibit similar mobility trends during dramatic events and to emphasize the importance of this type of data for public health measures. The study also aims to promote evidence for companies to continue releasing mobility trends data, given that all 3 companies have discontinued these services.

METHODS

In this study, we collected mobility data spanning from 2020 to 2022 from 3 major tech companies: Apple, Google, and Meta. Our analysis focused on 58 countries that are common to all 3 databases, enabling us to conduct a comprehensive global-scale analysis. By using the winter storm that occurred in Texas in 20201 as a benchmark, we were able to assess the robustness of the mobility data obtained from the 3 companies and ensure the integrity of our findings.

RESULTS

Our study revealed convergence in the mobility trends observed across different companies during the onset of significant disasters, such as the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the winter storm that impacted Texas in 2021. Specifically, we observed strong positive correlations (r=0.96) in the mobility data collected from different tech companies during the first year of the pandemic. Furthermore, our analysis of mobility data during the 2021 winter storm in Texas showed a similar convergence of trends. Additionally, we found that periods of stay-at-home orders were reflected in the data, with record-low mobility and record-high stay-at-home figures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide valuable insights into the ways in which major disruptive events can impact patterns of human mobility; moreover, the convergence of data across distinct methodologies highlights the potential value of leveraging mobility data from multiple sources for informing public health decision-making. Therefore, we conclude that the use of mobility data is an asset for health authorities to consider during natural disasters, as we determined that the data sets from 3 companies yielded convergent mobility patterns. Comparatively, data obtained from a single source would be limited, and therefore, more difficult to interpret, requiring careful analysis.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/d17a481b4405/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/2b12b51992b4/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/629be9e3a5c4/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/d17a481b4405/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/2b12b51992b4/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/629be9e3a5c4/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815c/10337444/d17a481b4405/publichealth_v9i1e44286_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

人员流动量的增加是导致 SARS-CoV-2 传染性病原体在 COVID-19 大流行期间传播的因素之一。为应对病毒,全球各国政府采取了限制人员流动的措施,从而控制疾病的传播。在大流行初期,苹果、谷歌和元(原 Facebook)等科技公司利用其基础设施,匿名从用户处收集流动报告。

目的

本研究旨在比较苹果、谷歌和元(原 Facebook)在 COVID-19 大流行期间和 2021 年德克萨斯州一场重大冬季风暴期间收集的流动数据报告。我们旨在探索这样一种假设,即在重大事件中,不同人群表现出相似的流动趋势,并强调此类数据对于公共卫生措施的重要性。该研究还旨在促使各公司继续发布流动趋势数据,因为这 3 家公司均已停止此类服务。

方法

本研究从苹果、谷歌和元(原 Facebook)这 3 家主要科技公司收集了 2020 年至 2022 年的流动数据。我们的分析重点是 3 个数据库共有的 58 个国家,从而能够进行全面的全球范围分析。通过将 2020 年德克萨斯州的冬季风暴作为基准,我们评估了从 3 家公司获得的流动数据的稳健性,并确保了研究结果的完整性。

结果

我们的研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年和 2021 年德克萨斯州冬季风暴等重大灾害发生之初,不同公司的流动趋势趋同。具体而言,我们观察到在大流行的第一年,不同科技公司收集的流动数据之间存在很强的正相关(r=0.96)。此外,我们对 2021 年德克萨斯州冬季风暴期间流动数据的分析也显示出类似的趋势趋同。此外,我们发现居家令期间的数据也有所反映,移动性降至历史新低,居家率则升至历史新高。

结论

我们的研究结果为重大干扰事件如何影响人类流动模式提供了宝贵的见解;此外,不同方法收集的数据趋同,突出了利用来自多个来源的流动数据为公共卫生决策提供信息的潜力。因此,我们得出结论,在自然灾害期间,移动数据对卫生当局而言是一项有用的资源,因为我们发现 3 家公司的数据集中存在趋同的流动模式。相比之下,从单一来源获取的数据将受到限制,因此更难以解释,需要仔细分析。

相似文献

1
Convergence in Mobility Data Sets From Apple, Google, and Meta.苹果、谷歌和 Meta 的移动数据集中的趋同。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 22;9:e44286. doi: 10.2196/44286.
2
Information-Seeking Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across the United States: Longitudinal Analysis of Google Trends Data.美国新冠疫情期间的信息寻求模式:谷歌趋势数据的纵向分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22933. doi: 10.2196/22933.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Public and Research Interest in Telemedicine From 2017 to 2022: Infodemiology Study of Google Trends Data and Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Literature.2017 年至 2022 年的远程医疗的公众和研究兴趣:谷歌趋势数据的信息流行病学研究和科学文献的文献计量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 16;26:e50088. doi: 10.2196/50088.
5
Revealing the Mysteries of Population Mobility Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: Comparative Analysis With Internet of Things-Based Thermostat Data and Google Mobility Insights.揭示 COVID-19 大流行期间加拿大人口流动的奥秘:基于物联网的恒温器数据与谷歌移动洞察的比较分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Mar 20;10:e46903. doi: 10.2196/46903.
6
Understanding Health Communication Through Google Trends and News Coverage for COVID-19: Multinational Study in Eight Countries.通过谷歌趋势和新冠疫情新闻报道理解健康传播:八国跨国研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 21;7(12):e26644. doi: 10.2196/26644.
7
Public Interest in Immunity and the Justification for Intervention in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Google Trends Data.公众对免疫的关注和在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段进行干预的正当性:谷歌趋势数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 18;23(6):e26368. doi: 10.2196/26368.
8
Search Volume of Insomnia and Suicide as Digital Footprints of Global Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: 3-Year Infodemiology Study.新冠疫情期间失眠与自杀的搜索量作为全球心理健康的数字足迹:为期三年的信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 17;27:e67646. doi: 10.2196/67646.
9
Association Between What People Learned About COVID-19 Using Web Searches and Their Behavior Toward Public Health Guidelines: Empirical Infodemiology Study.人们通过网络搜索了解 COVID-19 与他们对公共卫生指南行为之间的关联:实证信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 2;23(9):e28975. doi: 10.2196/28975.
10
Understanding the Use of Mobility Data in Disasters: Exploratory Qualitative Study of COVID-19 User Feedback.了解灾害中移动数据的使用:对COVID-19用户反馈的探索性定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 1;11:e52257. doi: 10.2196/52257.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of public transportation on the transmission of COVID-19 in Rwanda.公共交通对卢旺达 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;12:1345433. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1345433. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of lockdowns and restrictions during SARS-CoV-2 variant waves in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia.评估 SARS-CoV-2 变异浪潮期间加拿大新斯科舍省封锁和限制措施的有效性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 27;11:1142602. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1142602. eCollection 2023.
2
Explainable artificial intelligence as a reliable annotator of archaeal promoter regions.可解释人工智能作为古菌启动子区域的可靠注释器。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28571-7.
3
Urban exodus? Understanding human mobility in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic using Meta-Facebook data.
城市人口外流?利用Meta-脸书数据了解新冠疫情期间英国的人口流动情况。
Popul Space Place. 2023 Jan;29(1):e2637. doi: 10.1002/psp.2637. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
Genome Evolution and Early Introductions of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Mexico.墨西哥的新冠病毒奥密克戎变种的基因组进化与早期引入情况
Virus Evol. 2022 Dec 2;8(2):veac109. doi: 10.1093/ve/veac109. eCollection 2022.
5
An artificial neural network classification method employing longitudinally monitored immune biomarkers to predict the clinical outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients.采用纵向监测免疫生物标志物的人工神经网络分类方法来预测危重症 COVID-19 患者的临床转归。
PeerJ. 2022 Dec 12;10:e14487. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14487. eCollection 2022.
6
Novel mobility index tracks COVID-19 transmission following stay-at-home orders.新型流动性指数追踪居家令后 COVID-19 的传播情况。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10941-2.
7
An overview of effects of COVID-19 on mobility and lifestyle: 18 months since the outbreak.新冠疫情对出行和生活方式的影响概述:疫情爆发18个月以来
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:372-397. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Leveraging external data in the design and analysis of clinical trials in neuro-oncology.利用神经肿瘤学临床试验设计和分析中的外部数据。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):e456-e465. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00488-5.
9
Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission.减少流动性和 COVID-19 的传播。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1090. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21358-2.
10
How the individual human mobility spatio-temporally shapes the disease transmission dynamics.个体人类移动的时空如何塑造疾病传播动力学。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68230-9.