School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):857-874. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2226306. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
refers to policies that allow terminally ill patients to seek assistance from their medical providers to obtain medications to hasten death. In this paper, we used a 7-point policy analysis model to examine the diversity of medical aid in dying policies that exist in jurisdictions (states and territories) in the U.S. and the implications of these policies for suffering at end of life. As of this writing, these practices are available in 12 jurisdictions, including 11 states and the District of Columbia. Legalization has occurred via statutory approaches in 10 jurisdictions and permissive approaches in two jurisdictions. We discuss the structures of these laws, the requirements for participation, and the limitations created by having jurisdiction-specific policies on such broad, bioethical issues. Existing laws appear to relieve suffering in patients at end of life. Jurisdictional differences create barriers to comprehensive expansion but provide insights into practice in different contexts.
指的是允许绝症患者向医疗服务提供者寻求帮助以获取药物加速死亡的政策。在本文中,我们使用七点政策分析模型来研究美国司法管辖区(州和地区)中存在的安乐死援助政策的多样性,以及这些政策对临终痛苦的影响。截至本文撰写之时,这些做法在 12 个司法管辖区中可用,包括 11 个州和哥伦比亚特区。有 10 个司法管辖区通过法定途径实现了合法化,有 2 个司法管辖区采取了许可途径。我们讨论了这些法律的结构、参与要求以及在如此广泛的生物伦理问题上具有特定于司法管辖区的政策所产生的限制。现有法律似乎减轻了临终患者的痛苦。司法管辖区的差异造成了全面扩展的障碍,但为不同背景下的实践提供了一些见解。