• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在常规护理中提供生物心理社会医疗服务:聚焦AQ关键多中心随机对照试验结果。

Delivering Biopsychosocial Health Care Within Routine Care: Spotlight-AQ Pivotal Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Results.

作者信息

Kelly Ryan Charles, Price Hermione, Phiri Peter, Cummings Michael, Ali Amar, Patel Mayank, Barnard Ethan, Liu Yufan, Mendez Oscar, Barnard-Kelly Katharine

机构信息

Spotlight Consultations Ltd., Fareham, UK.

Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1177/19322968231183436. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1177/19322968231183436
PMID:37350136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11688703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Annual national diabetes audit data consistently shows most people with diabetes do not consistently achieve blood glucose targets for optimal health, despite the large range of treatment options available.

AIM

To explore the efficacy of a novel clinical intervention to address physical and mental health needs within routine diabetes consultations across health care settings.

METHODS

A multicenter, parallel group, individually randomized trial comparing consultation duration in adults diagnosed with T1D or T2D for ≥6 months using the Spotlight-AQ platform versus usual care. Secondary outcomes were HbA1c, depression, diabetes distress, anxiety, functional health status, and healthcare professional burnout. Machine learning models were utilized to analyze the data collected from the Spotlight-AQ platform to validate the reliability of question-concern association; as well as to identify key features that distinguish people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as well as important features that distinguish different levels of HbA1c.

RESULTS

= 98 adults with T1D or T2D; any HbA1c and receiving any diabetes treatment participated ( 49 intervention). Consultation duration for intervention participants was reduced in intervention consultations by 0.5 to 4.1 minutes (3%-14%) versus no change in the control group (-0.9 to +1.28 minutes). HbA1c improved in the intervention group by 6 mmol/mol (range 0-30) versus control group 3 mmol/mol (range 0-8). Moderate improvements in psychosocial outcomes were seen in the intervention group for functional health status; reduced anxiety, depression, and diabetes distress and improved well-being. None were statistically significant. HCPs reported improved communication and greater focus on patient priorities in consultations. Artificial Intelligence examination highlighted therapy and psychological burden were most important in predicting HbA1c levels. The Natural Language Processing semantic analysis confirmed the mapping relationship between questions and their corresponding concerns. Machine learning model revealed type 1 and type 2 patients have different concerns regarding psychological burden and knowledge. Moreover, the machine learning model emphasized that individuals with varying levels of HbA1c exhibit diverse levels of psychological burden and therapy-related concerns.

CONCLUSION

Spotlight-AQ was associated with shorter, more useful consultations; with improved HbA1c and moderate benefits on psychosocial outcomes. Results reflect the importance of a biopsychosocial approach to routine care visits. Spotlight-AQ is viable across health care settings for improved outcomes.

摘要

背景

年度全国糖尿病审计数据一直显示,尽管有大量可用的治疗选择,但大多数糖尿病患者并未持续达到最佳健康状态所需的血糖目标。

目的

探讨一种新型临床干预措施在跨医疗保健机构的常规糖尿病会诊中满足身心健康需求的疗效。

方法

一项多中心、平行组、个体随机试验,比较使用Spotlight-AQ平台与常规护理对诊断为1型糖尿病(T1D)或2型糖尿病(T2D)≥6个月的成年人的会诊时长。次要结局包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、抑郁、糖尿病困扰、焦虑、功能健康状况和医护人员职业倦怠。利用机器学习模型分析从Spotlight-AQ平台收集的数据,以验证问题-关注关联的可靠性;并识别区分1型和2型糖尿病患者的关键特征,以及区分不同HbA1c水平的重要特征。

结果

98例患有T1D或T2D、任何HbA1c水平且接受任何糖尿病治疗的成年人参与研究(49例为干预组)。干预组参与者的会诊时长在干预会诊中减少了0.5至4.1分钟(3%-14%),而对照组无变化(-0.9至+1.28分钟)。干预组的HbA1c改善了6 mmol/mol(范围0-30),而对照组为3 mmol/mol(范围0-8)。干预组在功能健康状况方面的心理社会结局有适度改善;焦虑、抑郁和糖尿病困扰减轻,幸福感增强。均无统计学意义。医护人员报告称会诊中的沟通得到改善,对患者优先事项的关注增加。人工智能检查突出显示治疗和心理负担在预测HbA1c水平方面最为重要。自然语言处理语义分析证实了问题与其相应关注之间的映射关系。机器学习模型显示1型和2型患者在心理负担和知识方面有不同的关注点。此外,机器学习模型强调不同HbA1c水平的个体表现出不同程度的心理负担和与治疗相关的关注。

结论

Spotlight-AQ与更简短、更有用的会诊相关;HbA1c得到改善,心理社会结局有适度益处。结果反映了生物心理社会方法在常规护理就诊中的重要性。Spotlight-AQ在跨医疗保健机构中可行,可改善结局。

相似文献

1
Delivering Biopsychosocial Health Care Within Routine Care: Spotlight-AQ Pivotal Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Results.在常规护理中提供生物心理社会医疗服务:聚焦AQ关键多中心随机对照试验结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1177/19322968231183436. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Feasibility of Spotlight Consultations Tool in Routine Care: Real-World Evidence.在常规护理中使用 Spotlight 咨询工具的可行性:真实世界证据。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):939-944. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994088. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Protocol paper: multi-Centre randomised controlled trial evaluating a pre-clinic diabetes assessment and mapped care planning intervention amongst adults with type 1, type 2 or pre-diabetes.方案论文:一项多中心随机对照试验,评估 1 型、2 型或糖尿病前期成人的预诊所糖尿病评估和映射护理计划干预。
Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06475-7.
4
Affect school and script analysis versus basic body awareness therapy in the treatment of psychological symptoms in patients with diabetes and high HbA1c concentrations: two study protocols for two randomized controlled trials.情感学校与脚本分析对比基础身体觉知疗法对糖尿病及高糖化血红蛋白浓度患者心理症状的治疗效果:两项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 27;17(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1347-8.
5
Cost-Effective Quality of Life Improvement While Reducing Health Care Professional Burnout With an AI-Driven Intervention for Personalized Medicine.通过人工智能驱动的个性化医疗干预提高生活质量的同时降低医疗保健专业人员职业倦怠的成本效益
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 30:19322968241310879. doi: 10.1177/19322968241310879.
6
The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial.引导式自主对1型糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白(HbA)≥64 mmol/mol患者自我管理的影响:一项基于群组的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 3;7(6):e013295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295.
7
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
8
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
9
Supported Telemonitoring and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes: The Telescot Diabetes Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.2型糖尿病患者的支持性远程监测与血糖控制:Telescot糖尿病实用多中心随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 26;13(7):e1002098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002098. eCollection 2016 Jul.
10
Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病成年患者糖尿病相关困扰的心理干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 27;9(9):CD011469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011469.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effective Quality of Life Improvement While Reducing Health Care Professional Burnout With an AI-Driven Intervention for Personalized Medicine.通过人工智能驱动的个性化医疗干预提高生活质量的同时降低医疗保健专业人员职业倦怠的成本效益
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 30:19322968241310879. doi: 10.1177/19322968241310879.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of Spotlight Consultations Tool in Routine Care: Real-World Evidence.在常规护理中使用 Spotlight 咨询工具的可行性:真实世界证据。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):939-944. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994088. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Burnout in healthcare: the case for organisational change.医疗保健领域的职业倦怠:组织变革的必要性
BMJ. 2019 Jul 30;366:l4774. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4774.
3
Utilizing eHealth and Telemedicine Technologies to Enhance Access and Quality of Consultations: It's Not What You Say, It's the Way You Say It.利用电子健康和远程医疗技术提高咨询的可及性和质量:重要的不是你说什么,而是你怎么说。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(S2):S241-S247. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0015.
4
Burnout in United States Healthcare Professionals: A Narrative Review.美国医疗保健专业人员的职业倦怠:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3681. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3681.
5
Metrics for glycaemic control - from HbA to continuous glucose monitoring.血糖控制的指标——从 HbA 到连续血糖监测。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;13(7):425-436. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.3. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Kaleidoscope model of diabetes care: time for a rethink?糖尿病护理的万花筒模型:是时候重新思考了吗?
Diabet Med. 2014 May;31(5):522-30. doi: 10.1111/dme.12400.
7
Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes.情绪困扰与 2 型糖尿病不良结局的前瞻性关联。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2472-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0181. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Does diabetes-related distress explain the presence of depressive symptoms and/or poor self-care in individuals with Type 1 diabetes?糖尿病相关困扰是否能解释 1 型糖尿病患者存在抑郁症状和/或自我护理不佳的情况?
Diabet Med. 2010 Feb;27(2):234-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02896.x.
9
The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 1 diabetes: systematic literature review.1型糖尿病成人患者中合并抑郁症的患病率:系统文献综述
Diabet Med. 2006 Apr;23(4):445-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01814.x.
10
Priority setting in clinical nursing practice: literature review.临床护理实践中的优先事项设定:文献综述
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Aug;47(4):427-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03120.x.