• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在常规护理中使用 Spotlight 咨询工具的可行性:真实世界证据。

Feasibility of Spotlight Consultations Tool in Routine Care: Real-World Evidence.

机构信息

Faculty of Health & Social Science, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.

BHR Limited, Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):939-944. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994088. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/1932296821994088
PMID:33709795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9264446/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Burnout in people with diabetes and healthcare professionals (HCPs) is at an all-time high. Spotlight AQ, a novel "smart" adaptive patient questionnaire, is designed to improve consultations by rapidly identifying patient priorities and presenting these in the context of best-practice care pathways to aid consultations. We aimed to determine Spotlight AQ's feasibility in routine care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Spotlight prototype tool was trialed at three centers: two UK primary care centers and one US specialist center (June-September 2020). Participants with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) completed the questionnaire prior to their routine consultations. Results were immediately available and formed the basis of the clinical discussion and decision-making within the clinic visit.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 49 adults took part, =31 T1D, (=18 female); and =18 T2D (=10 male, =4 female, =4 gender unreported). Each identified two priority concerns. "Psychological burden of diabetes" was the most common priority concern (T1D 27, 87.1%) followed by "gaining more skills about particular aspects of diabetes" (T1D =19, 61.3%), "improving support around me" (=8, 25.8%) and "diabetes-related treatment issues" (=8, 25.8%). Burden of diabetes was widespread as was lack of confidence around self-management. Similarly, psychological burden of diabetes was the primary concern for participants with T2D (=18,100%) followed by "gaining more skills about aspects of diabetes" (=7, 38.9%), "improving support around me" (=7, 38.9%) and "diabetes-related treatment issues" (=4; 22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Spotlight AQ is acceptable and feasible for use in routine care. Gaining more skills and addressing the psychological burden of diabetes are high-priority areas that must be addressed to reduce high levels of distress.

摘要

背景

糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的倦怠感达到了历史最高水平。Spotlight AQ 是一种新型的“智能”自适应患者问卷,旨在通过快速确定患者的优先事项并将其呈现于最佳实践护理路径的上下文中,来改善咨询服务。我们旨在确定 Spotlight AQ 在常规护理中的可行性。

材料与方法

Spotlight 原型工具在三个中心进行了试用:两个英国初级保健中心和一个美国专科中心(2020 年 6 月至 9 月)。1 型(T1D)或 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者在常规就诊前完成问卷。结果立即可用,并构成了诊所就诊期间临床讨论和决策的基础。

结果

共 49 名成年人参加了此次便利抽样研究,其中 31 名为 T1D(=18 名女性),18 名为 T2D(=10 名男性,=4 名女性,=4 名性别未报告)。每位患者都确定了两个优先事项。“糖尿病带来的心理负担”是最常见的优先事项(T1D 占 27 例,87.1%),其次是“了解更多有关糖尿病特定方面的技能”(T1D 占 19 例,61.3%),“改善我周围的支持”(=8,25.8%)和“与糖尿病相关的治疗问题”(=8,25.8%)。糖尿病的负担普遍存在,而且自我管理方面的信心也普遍不足。同样,T2D 患者的主要关注点也是糖尿病带来的心理负担(=18,100%),其次是“了解更多有关糖尿病方面的技能”(=7,38.9%),“改善我周围的支持”(=7,38.9%)和“与糖尿病相关的治疗问题”(=4;22.2%)。

结论

Spotlight AQ 在常规护理中是可接受和可行的。获得更多技能和解决糖尿病带来的心理负担是必须解决的高优先级问题,以降低高负担水平。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Spotlight Consultations Tool in Routine Care: Real-World Evidence.在常规护理中使用 Spotlight 咨询工具的可行性:真实世界证据。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):939-944. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994088. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Delivering Biopsychosocial Health Care Within Routine Care: Spotlight-AQ Pivotal Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Results.在常规护理中提供生物心理社会医疗服务:聚焦AQ关键多中心随机对照试验结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1177/19322968231183436. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Adults With Diabetes Distress Often Want to Talk With Their Health Professionals About It: Findings From an Audit of 4 Australian Specialist Diabetes Clinics.糖尿病困扰的成年人通常希望与他们的医疗保健专业人员讨论这个问题:对 4 家澳大利亚专科糖尿病诊所的审计结果。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Aug;44(6):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
4
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
5
Patients' readiness to receive psychosocial care during nurse-led routine diabetes consultations in primary care: A mixed methods study.患者在初级保健中接受护士主导的常规糖尿病咨询时接受心理社会关怀的准备情况:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
Protocol paper: multi-Centre randomised controlled trial evaluating a pre-clinic diabetes assessment and mapped care planning intervention amongst adults with type 1, type 2 or pre-diabetes.方案论文:一项多中心随机对照试验,评估 1 型、2 型或糖尿病前期成人的预诊所糖尿病评估和映射护理计划干预。
Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06475-7.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Flexible inclusion of dialogue about psychosocial aspects of life with type 1 diabetes in routine consultations: A study of a questionnaire-based dialogue tool to promote person-centred support.在常规会诊中灵活纳入有关1型糖尿病患者生活心理社会方面的对话:一项基于问卷的对话工具促进以患者为中心支持的研究
Diabet Med. 2022 Aug;39(8):e14881. doi: 10.1111/dme.14881. Epub 2022 May 22.
9
The buffering effect of social support on diabetes distress and depressive symptoms in adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.社会支持对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰和抑郁症状的缓冲作用。
Diabet Med. 2021 Apr;38(4):e14472. doi: 10.1111/dme.14472. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
A co-design study to develop supportive interventions to improve psychological and social adaptation among adults with new-onset type 1 diabetes in Denmark and the UK.丹麦和英国的一项共同设计研究,旨在开发支持性干预措施,以改善新发 1 型糖尿病成人的心理和社会适应能力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e051430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051430.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effective Quality of Life Improvement While Reducing Health Care Professional Burnout With an AI-Driven Intervention for Personalized Medicine.通过人工智能驱动的个性化医疗干预提高生活质量的同时降低医疗保健专业人员职业倦怠的成本效益
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 30:19322968241310879. doi: 10.1177/19322968241310879.
2
Delivering Biopsychosocial Health Care Within Routine Care: Spotlight-AQ Pivotal Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Results.在常规护理中提供生物心理社会医疗服务:聚焦AQ关键多中心随机对照试验结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1177/19322968231183436. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Impact of glycaemic technologies on quality of life and related outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: A narrative review.血糖技术对 1 型糖尿病成人患者生活质量和相关结局的影响:一篇叙述性综述。
Diabet Med. 2023 Jan;40(1):e14944. doi: 10.1111/dme.14944. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Protocol paper: multi-Centre randomised controlled trial evaluating a pre-clinic diabetes assessment and mapped care planning intervention amongst adults with type 1, type 2 or pre-diabetes.方案论文:一项多中心随机对照试验,评估 1 型、2 型或糖尿病前期成人的预诊所糖尿病评估和映射护理计划干预。
Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06475-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilizing eHealth and Telemedicine Technologies to Enhance Access and Quality of Consultations: It's Not What You Say, It's the Way You Say It.利用电子健康和远程医疗技术提高咨询的可及性和质量:重要的不是你说什么,而是你怎么说。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(S2):S241-S247. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0015.
2
Burnout in United States Healthcare Professionals: A Narrative Review.美国医疗保健专业人员的职业倦怠:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3681. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3681.
3
State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018.2016-2018 年 T1D 交换计划中 1 型糖尿病管理状况和结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66-72. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0384. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Eliciting the Patient's Agenda- Secondary Analysis of Recorded Clinical Encounters.引出患者的议程-记录临床交流的二次分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):36-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4540-5. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
5
Kaleidoscope model of diabetes care: time for a rethink?糖尿病护理的万花筒模型:是时候重新思考了吗?
Diabet Med. 2014 May;31(5):522-30. doi: 10.1111/dme.12400.
6
Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study.心理社会问题及改善糖尿病管理的障碍:跨国糖尿病态度、愿望与需求(DAWN)研究结果
Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01644.x.