• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Setting new research in the context of previous research: some options.

作者信息

Glasziou Paul, Jones Mark, Clarke Mike

机构信息

Instiute for Evidence Based Heathcare, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia

Instiute for Evidence Based Heathcare, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):44-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112300.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112300
PMID:37355250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10850654/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbc/10850654/a29e2a0bc698/bmjebm-2023-112300f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbc/10850654/a29e2a0bc698/bmjebm-2023-112300f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbc/10850654/a29e2a0bc698/bmjebm-2023-112300f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Setting new research in the context of previous research: some options.将新研究置于先前研究的背景下：一些选择。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):44-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112300.
2
Systematic reviews in context: highlighting systematic reviews relevant to Africa in the Pan African Medical Journal.背景下的系统评价：突出《泛非医学杂志》中与非洲相关的系统评价。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Jun 30;24:180. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.180.10100. eCollection 2016.
3
Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.发表在普通医学期刊上的对照试验报告中的讨论部分。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2799-801. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2799.
4
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效：一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
5
Qualitative evidence syntheses: Assessing the relative contributions of multi-context and single-context reviews.定性证据综合：评估多情境和单情境综述的相对贡献。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3812-3822. doi: 10.1111/jan.14186. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results-a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies.系统评价很少用于新结果的背景化——一项对元研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;11(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02062-8.
7
The CONSENSYS approach: An instrument to support CONtextual SENsitivity in SYStematic reviews.CONSENSYS方法：一种支持系统评价中情境敏感性的工具。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Mar;14(2):266-282. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1615. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews.卫生人力资源政策选项的效果：系统评价分析
Lancet. 2008 Feb 23;371(9613):668-674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60305-0.
10
Priority setting for new systematic reviews: processes and lessons learned in three regions in Africa.新系统评价的优先级设定：非洲三个地区的流程与经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 26;4(4):e001615. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001615. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all universities in Sweden.博士论文中系统评价的纳入标准、特征及方法学局限性：瑞典所有大学的横断面研究
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Jan 9;3(1):e70015. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70015. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.CONSORT 2025解释与阐述：随机对照试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081124. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081124.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化血压控制试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385(14):1268-1279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID-19: An analysis of PROSPERO records.大规模生产关于 COVID-19 的系统评价：PROSPERO 记录分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12426. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion.
循证研究系列论文 3：在完成研究后，采用循证研究方法将研究结果置于背景下，以确保结论的有用性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.老年人（年龄≥60 岁）强化降压治疗的获益与危害：系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 21;166(6):419-429. doi: 10.7326/M16-1754. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review.应用和未应用试验序贯分析的Cochrane系统评价中的假阳性结果：一项实证综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011890. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011890.
6
Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.实时系统评价：缩小证据-实践差距的新契机。
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 18;11(2):e1001603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. eCollection 2014 Feb.
7
Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting.临床试验应以对相关证据的系统评价为起点和终点：12年了，还在等待。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):20-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61045-8.
8
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述：平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
9
Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT): an open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial.多西他赛序贯方案作为早期乳腺癌辅助化疗（TACT）：一项开放标签、III期随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2009 May 16;373(9676):1681-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60740-6.
10
Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care.准备和更新医疗保健随机对照试验的系统评价。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):411-37.