• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者成人社会关怀结果工具包、照顾者体验量表和与关怀相关的生活质量如何能捕捉到澳大利亚非正规照顾者生活质量的重要方面?

How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia?

机构信息

Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3109-3121. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1. Epub 2023 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1
PMID:37356076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10522516/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Identify aspects of quality of life (QoL) important to Australian informal carers and explore how well the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Care-related Quality of Life instrument and Carer Experience Scale capture these aspects in the Australian context.

METHODS

Online questionnaires were completed by Australian informal carers. Socio-demographics, open-ended questions: positive/negative aspects of caring and QoL aspects missing from the instruments, and ranking of the instrument domains was used to explore the content of the instruments. Instruments were scored using preference-weighted value sets (reported in another paper). Content analysis was used to analyse the open-ended responses. Chi-squared test looked at differences in domain importance. Descriptive analyses summarised all other information.

RESULTS

Eight themes were identified: Behaviour-mood of the care recipient, Caring responsibilities, Finances, Health, Own life, Perception of carers, Relationship with care recipient and Support. Many aspects of carer QoL mentioned as missing in the instruments appeared covered by the domains, of which all were reported as important. The highest ranked domain was relationship with the care recipient. The influence of the care recipient specific support, behaviour/mood and health on carer QoL appear absent in all instruments.

CONCLUSION

The content of the three instruments appears relevant in an Australian setting. The influence of care recipient's health and well-being on carer QoL should be considered, along with spillover effects. A content and/or face validity analysis is required to confirm differences in item interpretation in Australian informal carers.

摘要

目的

确定对澳大利亚非专业照护者而言重要的生活质量(QoL)方面,并探讨成人社会护理成果工具包(Care-related Quality of Life instrument)和照护者体验量表(Carer Experience Scale)在澳大利亚背景下对这些方面的捕捉程度。

方法

澳大利亚非专业照护者在线完成调查问卷。使用社会人口统计学资料、开放式问题(照护的积极/消极方面以及工具中缺失的 QoL 方面)以及对工具领域的排名,来探索工具的内容。使用偏好加权值集(在另一篇论文中报告)对工具进行评分。使用内容分析法对开放式回答进行分析。卡方检验用于分析各领域的重要性差异。描述性分析总结了所有其他信息。

结果

确定了 8 个主题:照护对象的行为/情绪、照护责任、财务状况、健康、自身生活、照护者的认知、与照护对象的关系以及支持。提到工具中缺失的许多照护者 QoL 方面似乎涵盖在各领域中,且所有方面都被报告为重要的。排名最高的领域是与照护对象的关系。照护对象特定支持、行为/情绪和健康对照护者 QoL 的影响在所有工具中似乎都不存在。

结论

这三种工具的内容在澳大利亚环境中似乎具有相关性。应考虑照护对象的健康和福祉对照护者 QoL 的影响,以及外溢效应。需要进行内容和/或表面有效性分析,以确认澳大利亚非专业照护者对项目解释的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/072e/10522516/56e9253109ab/11136_2023_3459_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/072e/10522516/8de5bd5366d4/11136_2023_3459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/072e/10522516/56e9253109ab/11136_2023_3459_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/072e/10522516/8de5bd5366d4/11136_2023_3459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/072e/10522516/56e9253109ab/11136_2023_3459_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia?照顾者成人社会关怀结果工具包、照顾者体验量表和与关怀相关的生活质量如何能捕捉到澳大利亚非正规照顾者生活质量的重要方面?
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3109-3121. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
2
Measuring Carer Outcomes in an Economic Evaluation: A Content Comparison of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Carer Experience Scale, and Care-Related Quality of Life Using Exploratory Factor Analysis.使用探索性因子分析比较成人社会关怀成果工具包(用于护理者的)、护理者体验量表和关怀相关生活质量在经济评估中衡量护理者成果:内容比较。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Oct;40(7):885-896. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20944193. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
3
What's important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria.照顾亲人时最重要的是什么?基于人群的奥地利非正式照护者成人社会关怀结局工具包(ASCOT-Carer)的偏好权重。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1975-1984. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02775-8. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments.三种基于照顾者偏好的量表的心理测量学特性的头对头比较。
Value Health. 2020 Nov;23(11):1477-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal Carers (German ASCOT-Carer).将德文版《成人社会护理成果工具包(德文版 ASCOT-Carer)》翻译、文化适应性调整和构建效度的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):905-920. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02682-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
6
Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer).照顾者成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT-Carer)的因子结构与结构效度。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2601-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1011-x. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Carer Social Care-Related Quality of Life Outcomes: Estimating English Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers.照顾者的社会关怀相关生活质量结果:估计成人社会关怀结果工具包对照顾者的英语偏好权重。
Value Health. 2019 Dec;22(12):1427-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Understanding the Role, Quality of Life and Strategies Used by Older Carers of Older People to Maintain Their Own Health and Well-Being: A National Australian Survey.了解老年照护者在维持自身健康和福祉方面的角色、生活质量和策略:一项全国性的澳大利亚调查。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Oct 25;17:1549-1567. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S384202. eCollection 2022.
9
The Feasibility and Validity of Preference-Based Quality of Life Measures With Informal Carers: A Think-Aloud Study.偏好导向的生活质量测量在非正规照护者中的可行性和有效性:出声思维研究。
Value Health. 2023 Nov;26(11):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Validity and Responsiveness of Preference-Based Quality-of-Life Measures in Informal Carers: A Comparison of 5 Measures Across 4 Conditions.非正式照护者偏好的生命质量测量工具的有效性和反应度:5 种工具在 4 种条件下的比较。
Value Health. 2020 Jun;23(6):782-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of employment support in different work environments on individuals with intellectual disability and their families from their own perspectives: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.从自身角度看不同工作环境中的就业支持对智障人士及其家庭的影响:定性证据系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e098312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098312.
2
Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)在研究中的应用:一项国际范围综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3.
3
Implementation of a value-based approach for older people who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction: study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
The Challenges of Measuring Informal Care Time: A Review of the Literature.衡量非正式护理时间的挑战:文献综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1209-1223. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01053-2. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
Social care-related outcomes in Finland. Construct validity and structural characteristics of the Finnish ASCOT measure with older home care users.芬兰的社会关怀相关结果。使用老年家庭护理使用者评估芬兰 ASCOT 措施的构建效度和结构特征。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):712-728. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13328. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal Carers (German ASCOT-Carer).
针对急性心肌梗死老年患者实施基于价值的方法:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 3;12:1518469. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1518469. eCollection 2024.
将德文版《成人社会护理成果工具包(德文版 ASCOT-Carer)》翻译、文化适应性调整和构建效度的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):905-920. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02682-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments.三种基于照顾者偏好的量表的心理测量学特性的头对头比较。
Value Health. 2020 Nov;23(11):1477-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
A validation study of the CarerQol instrument in informal caregivers of people with dementia from eight European countries.一项针对来自八个欧洲国家的痴呆症患者非专业照护者的 CarerQol 工具的验证研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):577-588. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02657-5. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for service users (German ASCOT).成人社会关怀结果工具包(德国 ASCOT)使用者德语版的跨文化调适和结构效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 6;18(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01533-7.
7
Measuring Carer Outcomes in an Economic Evaluation: A Content Comparison of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Carer Experience Scale, and Care-Related Quality of Life Using Exploratory Factor Analysis.使用探索性因子分析比较成人社会关怀成果工具包(用于护理者的)、护理者体验量表和关怀相关生活质量在经济评估中衡量护理者成果:内容比较。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Oct;40(7):885-896. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20944193. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
8
Validity and Responsiveness of Preference-Based Quality-of-Life Measures in Informal Carers: A Comparison of 5 Measures Across 4 Conditions.非正式照护者偏好的生命质量测量工具的有效性和反应度:5 种工具在 4 种条件下的比较。
Value Health. 2020 Jun;23(6):782-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L.测量无偿护理者长期护理的结果:比较 ASCOT-Carer、护理者体验量表和 EQ-5D-3L。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2.
10
Carer Social Care-Related Quality of Life Outcomes: Estimating English Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers.照顾者的社会关怀相关生活质量结果:估计成人社会关怀结果工具包对照顾者的英语偏好权重。
Value Health. 2019 Dec;22(12):1427-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Nov 14.