• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰的社会关怀相关结果。使用老年家庭护理使用者评估芬兰 ASCOT 措施的构建效度和结构特征。

Social care-related outcomes in Finland. Construct validity and structural characteristics of the Finnish ASCOT measure with older home care users.

机构信息

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):712-728. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13328. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13328
PMID:33639030
Abstract

The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit four response-level interview schedule (ASCOT INT4) for service users was translated into Finnish. The aim of this paper was to investigate the construct validity and structural characteristics of the Finnish ASCOT. We used data from a face-to-face interview survey of older people receiving publicly funded home care services, which was conducted in 2016-2017 (n = 493), excluding missing values and proxy respondents (n = 334). Chi-square tests, adjusted residuals and analyses of variance were used to examine hypothesised associations between each attribute and a number of relevant variables regarding health and well-being, disabilities, living arrangements, social contact and support, experience of service use, and the nature of the locality and environment. Structural characteristics were explored using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha test. The EQ-5D-3L and ASCOT were moderately correlated (r = 0.429; p < 0.001). The ASCOT attributes were statistically positively related to the overall quality of life. For other tested variables, we found a high number of significant associations with the control over daily life, occupation, social participation, and personal cleanliness attributes, but fewer significant associations with the other attributes. Cronbach's alpha was 0.697 and a single factor was extracted. This assessment provides evidence to support the construct validity of the Finnish ASCOT. The results support the introduction of the Finnish ASCOT into Finland for use in practical applications. Future research on its reliability would be useful.

摘要

成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)四级受访者访谈日程表(ASCOT INT4)被译为芬兰语。本文旨在探讨芬兰 ASCOT 的结构效度和结构特征。我们使用了 2016-2017 年面对面访谈调查(n=493)中接受公共资助家庭护理服务的老年人的数据,排除了缺失值和代理受访者(n=334)。卡方检验、调整残差和方差分析用于检验每个属性与健康和福祉、残疾、居住安排、社会联系和支持、服务使用经验以及当地环境性质等相关变量之间的假设关联。结构特征通过探索性因素分析和克朗巴赫α检验进行探索。EQ-5D-3L 和 ASCOT 呈中度相关(r=0.429;p<0.001)。ASCOT 属性与整体生活质量呈统计学正相关。对于其他测试变量,我们发现与日常生活控制、职业、社会参与和个人卫生属性有高度显著的关联,但与其他属性的关联较少。克朗巴赫α为 0.697,提取了一个单一因素。这一评估为芬兰 ASCOT 的结构效度提供了证据支持。研究结果支持将芬兰 ASCOT 引入芬兰,用于实际应用。未来对其可靠性的研究将是有用的。

相似文献

1
Social care-related outcomes in Finland. Construct validity and structural characteristics of the Finnish ASCOT measure with older home care users.芬兰的社会关怀相关结果。使用老年家庭护理使用者评估芬兰 ASCOT 措施的构建效度和结构特征。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):712-728. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13328. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people.评估 ASCOT 工具测量老年人与社会护理相关生活质量的结构效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Feb 10;10:21. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-21.
3
Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)在英格兰患有长期身体、感官和心理健康问题的成年人中的效度及重测信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 18;15(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0.
4
Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer).照顾者成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT-Carer)的因子结构与结构效度。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2601-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1011-x. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
Measuring quality of life in care homes when self-report is challenging: the construct validity, structural characteristics and internal consistency of the mixed-methods adult social care outcomes toolkit.在自我报告具有挑战性的情况下衡量养老院的生活质量:混合方法成人社会护理结果工具包的构建效度、结构特征和内部一致性。
Age Ageing. 2023 Sep 1;52(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad168.
6
Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal Carers (German ASCOT-Carer).将德文版《成人社会护理成果工具包(德文版 ASCOT-Carer)》翻译、文化适应性调整和构建效度的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):905-920. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02682-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for service users (German ASCOT).成人社会关怀结果工具包(德国 ASCOT)使用者德语版的跨文化调适和结构效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 6;18(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01533-7.
8
Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L.测量无偿护理者长期护理的结果:比较 ASCOT-Carer、护理者体验量表和 EQ-5D-3L。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2.
9
Comparing measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O, and ASCOT in frail older adults.比较EQ-5D-3L、ICECAP-O和ASCOT在体弱老年人中的测量属性。
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people.在社区居住的老年人群体中对简明患者报告结局量表(OPQoL-Brief)、欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)和老年人综合照护评估工具(ASCOT)进行实证比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 30;13:164. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0357-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation, and content validation of the Hong Kong Chinese version of Self-completion Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) for care service users.针对护理服务使用者的《香港中文版成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)》的翻译、文化调适及内容效度验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jun 4;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02389-5.
2
Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)在研究中的应用:一项国际范围综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3.
3
Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff.
采用探索性因子分析和 Rasch 分析来评估由养老院工作人员完成的成人社会关怀结局工具包代理版(ASCOT-Proxy)的结构有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1555-1567. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03631-1. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
Exploring the structural characteristics of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) and ASCOT-Carer.探索成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)和ASCOT-照顾者的结构特征。
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Mar 21;2:21. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13259.2. eCollection 2022.
5
Measuring quality of life in care homes when self-report is challenging: the construct validity, structural characteristics and internal consistency of the mixed-methods adult social care outcomes toolkit.在自我报告具有挑战性的情况下衡量养老院的生活质量:混合方法成人社会护理结果工具包的构建效度、结构特征和内部一致性。
Age Ageing. 2023 Sep 1;52(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad168.
6
How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia?照顾者成人社会关怀结果工具包、照顾者体验量表和与关怀相关的生活质量如何能捕捉到澳大利亚非正规照顾者生活质量的重要方面?
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3109-3121. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
7
Feasibility, validity and reliability of the ASCOT-Proxy and ASCOT-Carer among unpaid carers of people living with dementia in England.英国痴呆症患者非付费照顾者中 ASCOT-Proxy 和 ASCOT-Carer 的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02122-0.
8
Social care-related quality of life of people with dementia and their carers in England.英格兰痴呆症患者及其照护者的与社会关怀相关的生活质量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2406-e2418. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13681. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
9
Do You Prefer Safety to Social Participation? Finnish Population-Based Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for Service Users.相较于社会参与,你更看重安全吗?芬兰基于人群的成年服务使用者社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)偏好权重。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 9;6(2):23814683211027902. doi: 10.1177/23814683211027902. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.